Individual differences in relative fertility costs and fertility benefits and their effects on fertility desire for a second child in China: a latent profile analysis.
China
Fertility benefits
Fertility desire
Latent profile analysis
Relative fertility costs
Journal
Reproductive health
ISSN: 1742-4755
Titre abrégé: Reprod Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101224380
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Jul 2019
18 Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
24
04
2019
accepted:
04
07
2019
entrez:
20
7
2019
pubmed:
20
7
2019
medline:
28
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Fertility desire for a second child has been a lively topic since the implementation of the two-child policy in China. Chinese researchers have explored various factors influencing the fertility desire for a second child. However, there have not been studies on the individual differences in the relative fertility costs and fertility benefits and their effects on fertility desire for a second child. A total of 396 participants rated four kinds of relative fertility costs, four kinds of fertility benefits and their fertility desire for a second child. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to explore the individual differences in the relative fertility costs and fertility benefits and their effects on fertility desire for a second child. Stepwise regression analysis showed that parenting joy, health risks, mutual care among siblings, the flourishing of family, and time pressure and opportunity cost significantly predicted the fertility desire for the second child. According to the latent profile analysis, the participants were classified into four classes. Participants in the lowest-cost/lowest-benefit and high-cost/medium-benefit classes had low fertility desire for a second child, while those in the low-cost/high-benefit and highest-cost/highest-benefit classes had high fertility desire. Fertility benefits have a stronger effect on the fertility desire for a second child than relative fertility costs. Fertility benefits should be paid more attention to than relative fertility costs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Fertility desire for a second child has been a lively topic since the implementation of the two-child policy in China. Chinese researchers have explored various factors influencing the fertility desire for a second child. However, there have not been studies on the individual differences in the relative fertility costs and fertility benefits and their effects on fertility desire for a second child.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 396 participants rated four kinds of relative fertility costs, four kinds of fertility benefits and their fertility desire for a second child. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to explore the individual differences in the relative fertility costs and fertility benefits and their effects on fertility desire for a second child.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Stepwise regression analysis showed that parenting joy, health risks, mutual care among siblings, the flourishing of family, and time pressure and opportunity cost significantly predicted the fertility desire for the second child. According to the latent profile analysis, the participants were classified into four classes. Participants in the lowest-cost/lowest-benefit and high-cost/medium-benefit classes had low fertility desire for a second child, while those in the low-cost/high-benefit and highest-cost/highest-benefit classes had high fertility desire.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Fertility benefits have a stronger effect on the fertility desire for a second child than relative fertility costs. Fertility benefits should be paid more attention to than relative fertility costs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31319866
doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0770-1
pii: 10.1186/s12978-019-0770-1
pmc: PMC6639970
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
110Subventions
Organisme : Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
ID : 2019WP04
Références
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000 Jun;24(6):882-91
pubmed: 10888079
Child Dev. 2007 Nov-Dec;78(6):1706-22
pubmed: 17988316
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683
Hum Nat. 2010 Mar;21(1):39-61
pubmed: 20376180
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Feb;141(1):2-18
pubmed: 21823805
Popul Stud (Camb). 2012 Nov;66(3):311-27
pubmed: 22889178
Adv Life Course Res. 2014 Sep;21:10-27
pubmed: 26047539
Adv Life Course Res. 2014 Sep;21:28-42
pubmed: 26047540
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;131(3):457-463
pubmed: 29420406