The impact of social norms interventions on clinical behaviour change among health workers: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Behaviour change
Credible source
Feedback
Information about others’ approval
Meta-analysis
Social comparison
Social incentive
Social norm
Social reward
Systematic review
Journal
Systematic reviews
ISSN: 2046-4053
Titre abrégé: Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 07 2019
18 07 2019
Historique:
received:
27
09
2018
accepted:
24
06
2019
entrez:
20
7
2019
pubmed:
20
7
2019
medline:
29
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Health workers routinely carry out clinical behaviours, such as prescribing, test-ordering or hand-washing, which impact on patient diagnoses, care, treatment and recovery. Social norms are the implicit or explicit rules that a group uses to determine values, beliefs, attitudes and behaviours. A social norms intervention seeks to change the clinical behaviour of a target health worker by exposing them to the values, beliefs, attitudes or behaviours of a reference group or person. This study aims to find out whether or not social norms interventions are effective ways of encouraging health workers to carry out desired behaviours and to identify which types of social norms intervention, if any, are most effective. A systematic review will be conducted. The inclusion criteria are a population of health professionals, a social norms intervention that seeks to change a clinical behaviour, and randomised controlled trials. Searches will be undertaken in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, British Nursing Index, ISI Web of Science, PsycINFO and Cochrane trials. Titles and abstracts will be reviewed against the inclusion criteria to exclude any that are clearly ineligible. Two reviewers will independently screen all the remaining full texts to identify relevant papers. For studies which meet our inclusion criteria, two reviewers will extract data independently, code for behaviour change techniques and assess quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcome measure will be compliance with desired behaviour. To assess the effect of social norms on the behaviour of health workers, we will perform fixed effects meta-analysis and present forest plots, stratified by behaviour change technique. We will explore sources of variation using meta-regression and may use multi-component-based network meta-analysis to explore which forms of social norms are more likely to be effective, if our data meet the necessary requirements. The study will provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of different methods of applying social norms to change the clinical behaviour of health professionals. We will disseminate the research to academics, health workers and members of the public and use the findings from the review to plan future research on the use of social norms with health workers. PROSPERO CRD42016045718. Future protocol changes will be clearly stated in PROSPERO.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Health workers routinely carry out clinical behaviours, such as prescribing, test-ordering or hand-washing, which impact on patient diagnoses, care, treatment and recovery. Social norms are the implicit or explicit rules that a group uses to determine values, beliefs, attitudes and behaviours. A social norms intervention seeks to change the clinical behaviour of a target health worker by exposing them to the values, beliefs, attitudes or behaviours of a reference group or person. This study aims to find out whether or not social norms interventions are effective ways of encouraging health workers to carry out desired behaviours and to identify which types of social norms intervention, if any, are most effective.
METHODS
A systematic review will be conducted. The inclusion criteria are a population of health professionals, a social norms intervention that seeks to change a clinical behaviour, and randomised controlled trials. Searches will be undertaken in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, British Nursing Index, ISI Web of Science, PsycINFO and Cochrane trials. Titles and abstracts will be reviewed against the inclusion criteria to exclude any that are clearly ineligible. Two reviewers will independently screen all the remaining full texts to identify relevant papers. For studies which meet our inclusion criteria, two reviewers will extract data independently, code for behaviour change techniques and assess quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcome measure will be compliance with desired behaviour. To assess the effect of social norms on the behaviour of health workers, we will perform fixed effects meta-analysis and present forest plots, stratified by behaviour change technique. We will explore sources of variation using meta-regression and may use multi-component-based network meta-analysis to explore which forms of social norms are more likely to be effective, if our data meet the necessary requirements.
DISCUSSION
The study will provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of different methods of applying social norms to change the clinical behaviour of health professionals. We will disseminate the research to academics, health workers and members of the public and use the findings from the review to plan future research on the use of social norms with health workers.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42016045718. Future protocol changes will be clearly stated in PROSPERO.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31319887
doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1077-6
pii: 10.1186/s13643-019-1077-6
pmc: PMC6637585
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
176Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : HS&DR/17/06/06
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Stat Med. 2000 Nov 30;19(22):3127-31
pubmed: 11113947
Acad Radiol. 2012 Sep;19(9):1114-20
pubmed: 22727623
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Dec;52(485):974-80
pubmed: 12528582
Lancet. 2013 May 11;381(9878):1606-9
pubmed: 23489756
J Hosp Infect. 2014 Jan;86 Suppl 1:S1-70
pubmed: 24330862
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 17;9:14
pubmed: 24438584
Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(10):1618-25
pubmed: 20207464
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1559-73
pubmed: 12111920
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Apr;50(4):464-74
pubmed: 22939048
Ann Behav Med. 2015 Dec;49(6):885-900
pubmed: 26290002
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e000858
pubmed: 30775014
Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 18;8(1):176
pubmed: 31319887
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD000259
pubmed: 22696318
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Aug 18;8:56
pubmed: 18706124
BMJ. 2010 Aug 24;341:c4259
pubmed: 20736254
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687
pubmed: 24609605
Transl Behav Med. 2015 Jun;5(2):134-48
pubmed: 26029276
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;60(10):981-9
pubmed: 17884591
Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Sep 1;150(5):469-75
pubmed: 10472946
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986
Evid Based Ment Health. 2016 Feb;19(1):16-21
pubmed: 26792834
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Dec;69(12):3423-30
pubmed: 25091508
Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 17;8:142
pubmed: 24341511
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 26;14(1):40
pubmed: 31027495