Selection of Visual Objects in Perception and Working Memory One at a Time.


Journal

Psychological science
ISSN: 1467-9280
Titre abrégé: Psychol Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9007542

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 20 7 2019
medline: 23 6 2020
entrez: 20 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

How does the content of visual working memory influence the way we process the visual environment? We addressed this question using the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), which provides a discernible measure of visuocortical activation to multiple stimuli simultaneously. Fifty-six adults were asked to remember a set of two oriented gratings. During the retention interval, two frequency-tagged oriented gratings were presented to probe the visuocortical processing of matching versus mismatching orientations relative to the memory set. Matching probes prompted an increased visuocortical response, whereas mismatching stimuli were suppressed. This suggests that the visual cortex prioritizes attentional selection of memory-relevant features at the expense of non-memory-relevant features. When two memory items were probed simultaneously, visuocortical amplification alternated between the two stimuli at a rate of 3 Hz to 4 Hz, consistent with the rate of attentional sampling of sensory events from the external world. These results suggest a serial, single-item attentional sampling of remembered features.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31322983
doi: 10.1177/0956797619854067
pmc: PMC6794657
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1259-1272

Subventions

Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH097320
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH112558
Pays : United States

Références

Trends Neurosci. 2006 Jun;29(6):317-22
pubmed: 16697058
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Apr;28(4):323-34
pubmed: 16779799
Curr Biol. 2015 Aug 31;25(17):2332-7
pubmed: 26279231
J Neurosci Methods. 2010 Sep 30;192(1):152-62
pubmed: 20654646
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Oct;20(10):723-735
pubmed: 27567317
J Vis. 2015;15(6):4
pubmed: 26024451
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2017;52:81-104
pubmed: 28215289
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Apr;20(2):172-6
pubmed: 20307966
J Vis. 2009 Jun 08;9(6):2.1-7
pubmed: 19761293
Exp Psychol. 2003;50(4):257-69
pubmed: 14587173
Curr Biol. 2014 Sep 8;24(17):1985-8
pubmed: 25155510
J Neurosci. 2017 Jul 12;37(28):6638-6647
pubmed: 28592696
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 19;103(38):14250-4
pubmed: 16956975
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;15(7):327-34
pubmed: 21665518
Neuron. 2011 Nov 17;72(4):520-35
pubmed: 22099456
Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb;20(2):207-14
pubmed: 19170936
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Sep;12(9):342-8
pubmed: 18693131
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1339:1-10
pubmed: 25428708
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):1839-60
pubmed: 27098647
Doc Ophthalmol. 1999;99(1):69-82
pubmed: 10947010
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jul;42(7):911-7
pubmed: 27123681
Psychophysiology. 2011 Dec;48(12):1711-25
pubmed: 21895683
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Nov;77(8):2653-68
pubmed: 26341873
Neuron. 2018 Aug 22;99(4):854-865.e5
pubmed: 30138591
Neuropsychologia. 2011 May;49(6):1553-8
pubmed: 21145332
Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28;139(1):23-38
pubmed: 16324795
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jan;76(1):64-72
pubmed: 24114356
J Neurosci. 2015 Apr 8;35(14):5489-503
pubmed: 25855167
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 6;12(4):e0175230
pubmed: 28384347
Percept Psychophys. 1990 Jun;47(6):532-50
pubmed: 2367174
J Neurosci. 2018 Jun 6;38(23):5267-5276
pubmed: 29739867
Neuron. 2009 Jan 29;61(2):168-85
pubmed: 19186161
Neuron. 2015 Oct 7;88(1):220-35
pubmed: 26447583
Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1151-8
pubmed: 22923337
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):225-37
pubmed: 19293088
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Oct;32(5):1243-65
pubmed: 17002535
J Vis. 2011 Jan 10;11(1):11
pubmed: 21220539
Nature. 2009 Apr 2;458(7238):632-5
pubmed: 19225460
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Jun;21(6):449-461
pubmed: 28454719
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Aug;40(4):1450-64
pubmed: 24730738

Auteurs

Nina Thigpen (N)

Department of Psychology, University of Florida.

Nathan M Petro (NM)

Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Jessica Oschwald (J)

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich.

Klaus Oberauer (K)

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich.

Andreas Keil (A)

Department of Psychology, University of Florida.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH