To treat or not to treat? A retrospective multicenter assessment of survival in patients with IDH-mutant low-grade glioma based on adjuvant treatment.

CI = confidence interval CT = chemotherapy CTR = complete tumor resection EOR = extent of resection EORTC = European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer HR = hazard ratio IDH IDH = isocitrate dehydrogenase KPS = Karnofsky Performance Scale LGG LGG = low-grade glioma LOH = loss of heterogeneity OS = overall survival PCV = procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine PFS = progression-free survival RT = radiation therapy RTOG = Radiation Therapy Oncology Group STR = subtotal resection TMZ = temozolomide adjuvant therapy iMRI = intraoperative MRI isocitrate dehydrogenase low-grade glioma oncology survival −2LL = −2 log-likelihood

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery
ISSN: 1933-0693
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0253357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jul 2019
Historique:
received: 11 12 2018
accepted: 18 04 2019
entrez: 20 7 2019
pubmed: 20 7 2019
medline: 20 7 2019
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The level of evidence for adjuvant treatment of diffuse WHO grade II glioma (low-grade glioma, LGG) is low. In so-called "high-risk" patients most centers currently apply an early aggressive adjuvant treatment after surgery. The aim of this assessment was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients receiving radiation therapy (RT) alone, chemotherapy (CT) alone, or a combined/consecutive RT+CT, with patients receiving no primary adjuvant treatment after surgery. Based on a retrospective multicenter cohort of 288 patients (≥ 18 years old) with diffuse WHO grade II gliomas, a subgroup analysis of patients with a confirmed isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation was performed. The influence of primary adjuvant treatment after surgery on PFS and OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariate Cox regression models, including age (≥ 40 years), complete tumor resection (CTR), recurrent surgery, and astrocytoma versus oligodendroglioma. One hundred forty-four patients matched the inclusion criteria. Forty patients (27.8%) received adjuvant treatment. The median follow-up duration was 6 years (95% confidence interval 4.8-6.3 years). The median overall PFS was 3.9 years and OS 16.1 years. PFS and OS were significantly longer without adjuvant treatment (p = 0.003). A significant difference in favor of no adjuvant therapy was observed even in high-risk patients (age ≥ 40 years or residual tumor, 3.9 vs 3.1 years, p = 0.025). In the multivariate model (controlled for age, CTR, oligodendroglial diagnosis, and recurrent surgery), patients who received no adjuvant therapy showed a significantly positive influence on PFS (p = 0.030) and OS (p = 0.009) compared to any other adjuvant treatment regimen. This effect was most pronounced if RT+CT was applied (p = 0.004, hazard ratio [HR] 2.7 for PFS, and p = 0.001, HR 20.2 for OS). CTR was independently associated with longer PFS (p = 0.019). Age ≥ 40 years, histopathological diagnosis, and recurrence did not achieve statistical significance. In this series of IDH-mutated LGGs, adjuvant treatment with RT, CT with temozolomide (TMZ), or the combination of both showed no significant advantage in terms of PFS and OS. Even in high-risk patients, the authors observed a similar significantly negative impact of adjuvant treatment on PFS and OS. These results underscore the importance of a CTR in LGG. Whether patients ≥ 40 years old should receive adjuvant treatment despite a CTR should be a matter of debate. A potential tumor dedifferentiation by administration of early TMZ, RT, or RT+CT in IDH-mutated LGG should be considered. However, these data are limited by the retrospective study design and the potentially heterogeneous indication for adjuvant treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31323633
doi: 10.3171/2019.4.JNS183395
pii: 2019.4.JNS183395
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1-8

Auteurs

Andrej Paľa (A)

1Department of Neurosurgery.

Jan Coburger (J)

1Department of Neurosurgery.

Moritz Scherer (M)

2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg.

Hajrullah Ahmeti (H)

3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel.

Constantin Roder (C)

4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tübingen; and.

Florian Gessler (F)

5Department of Neurosurgery, University of Frankfurt, Germany.

Christine Jungk (C)

2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg.

Angelika Scheuerle (A)

6Department of Pathology, Section of Neuropathology, and.

Christian Senft (C)

5Department of Neurosurgery, University of Frankfurt, Germany.

Marcos Tatagiba (M)

4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tübingen; and.

Michael Synowitz (M)

3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel.

Christian Rainer Wirtz (CR)

1Department of Neurosurgery.

Bernd Schmitz (B)

7Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, University of Ulm, Günzburg.

Andreas W Unterberg (AW)

2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg.

Classifications MeSH