Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in pediatric pseudotumor cerebri syndrome.
CSF dynamics
CSF infusion studies
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
Intracranial pressure
Pseudotumor cerebri
Journal
Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery
ISSN: 1433-0350
Titre abrégé: Childs Nerv Syst
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8503227
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
received:
22
05
2019
accepted:
17
06
2019
pubmed:
22
7
2019
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
21
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is a growing body of evidence highlighting the importance of comprehensive intracranial pressure (ICP) values in pseudotumor cerebri syndrome (PTCS). Due to the highly dynamic nature of ICP, several methods of ICP monitoring have been established, including the CSF infusion study. We have performed a retrospective review of the CSF dynamics measurements for all pediatric patients investigated for PTCS in our center and examined their diagnostic value compared with clinical classification. We retrospectively recruited 31 patients under 16 years of age investigated for PTCS by CSF infusion test. We used the clinically provided Friedman classification 13/31 patients with definite PTCS (group A), 13/31 with probable PTCS (group B), and 5/31 not PTCS (group C), to compare CSF dynamics in the 3 groups. CSF pressure (CSFp) was significantly increased in group A (29.18 ± 7.72 mmHg) compared with B (15.31 ± 3.47 mmHg; p = 1.644e-05) and C (17.51 ± 5.87; p = 0.01368). The amplitude (AMP) was higher in the definite (2.18 ± 2.06 mmHg) than in group B (0.68 ± 0.37; p = 0.01382). There was no in either CSFp or AMP between groups B and C. No lower breakpoint of the AMP-P line was observed in group A but was present in 2/13 and 2/5 patients in groups B and C. In group A, sagittal sinus pressure (SSp) and elasticity were the only parameters above threshold (p = 4.2e-06 and p = 0.001953, respectively), In group B, only the elasticity was significantly higher than the threshold (p = 004257). Group C did not have any of the parameters raised. The AUC of CSFp, elasticity, and SSp for the 3 groups was 93.8% (84.8-100% CI). Monitoring of CSFp and its dynamics, besides providing a more precise methodology for measuring CSFp, could yield information on the dynamic parameters of CSFp that cannot be derived from CSFp as a number, accurately differentiating between the clinically and radiologically derived entities of PTCS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31325030
doi: 10.1007/s00381-019-04263-4
pii: 10.1007/s00381-019-04263-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
73-86Références
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2006;96:114-8
pubmed: 16671437
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Jul;76(7):965-70
pubmed: 15965203
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2008;44(4):269-79
pubmed: 18480615
Neurol Clin. 2004 Feb;22(1):99-131, vi
pubmed: 15062530
Br J Neurosurg. 2001 Oct;15(5):439-40
pubmed: 11708551
Math Med Biol. 2013 Jun;30(2):157-74
pubmed: 22345141
Physiol Meas. 2005 Dec;26(6):1137-48
pubmed: 16311460
Acta Neurol Scand. 2014 Aug;130(2):131-8
pubmed: 24660859
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1992;119(1-4):12-6
pubmed: 1481738
Physiol Meas. 2004 Oct;25(5):R51-76
pubmed: 15535175
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 May;60(5):549-58
pubmed: 8778261
J Neurosurg. 1987 Jun;66(6):883-90
pubmed: 3572518
Brain. 2004 May;127(Pt 5):965-72
pubmed: 15033897
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;95:247-51
pubmed: 16463858
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1977 Feb;40(2):105-19
pubmed: 864474
Neurol Res. 2016 Jul;38(7):587-92
pubmed: 27278507
Front Neurol. 2018 Sep 28;9:819
pubmed: 30356916
Acta Neurol Scand. 2011 Aug;124(2):85-98
pubmed: 21208195
Arch Dis Child. 2017 Aug;102(8):715-721
pubmed: 28356250
Crit Care Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1173-81
pubmed: 26968025
J Neurosurg. 1975 Nov;43(5):523-34
pubmed: 1181384
Acta Neurol Scand. 1973;49(5):557-74
pubmed: 4770652
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978 Apr;41(4):345-53
pubmed: 650242
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2018;126:229-232
pubmed: 29492566
Neurosurg Focus. 2007 May 15;22(5):E10
pubmed: 17613228
Neurology. 2013 Sep 24;81(13):1159-65
pubmed: 23966248
J Neurosurg. 2018 Mar 16;130(1):154-162
pubmed: 29547089
J Child Neurol. 2015 Feb;30(2):170-3
pubmed: 24799366
J Neurosurg. 2014 Mar;120(3):697-707
pubmed: 24405071
Crit Care. 2016 May 05;20(1):129
pubmed: 27145751
Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1997 Aug;14(3):185-98
pubmed: 9387008
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008;102:283-5
pubmed: 19388330
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 Dec;63(6):721-31
pubmed: 9416805
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;75(6):813-21
pubmed: 15145991
Neurosurgery. 2002 Jan;50(1):70-7
pubmed: 11844236
Acta Neurol Scand. 2016 Sep;134(3):168-80
pubmed: 26666840
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2012;113:9-14
pubmed: 22116414
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77
pubmed: 21414208
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002 Mar;144(3):243-54
pubmed: 11956937
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 26;363(9):891-3
pubmed: 20818852
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1989;101(3-4):112-6
pubmed: 2618814
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 Aug;56(8):749-55
pubmed: 24854011
Neurosurgery. 2009 Mar;64(3):494-501; discussion 501-2
pubmed: 19240611
Physiol Meas. 2009 Jul;30(7):647-59
pubmed: 19498218
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1988;93(3-4):140-5
pubmed: 3177031