Are Currently Used Bioimpedance Methods in Hemodialysis Comparable for Calculating Dialysis Dose?
Bioimpedance
Dialysis dose
Fluid status
Hemodialysis
Journal
Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy
ISSN: 1744-9987
Titre abrégé: Ther Apher Dial
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101181252
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
12
02
2019
revised:
13
07
2019
accepted:
16
07
2019
pubmed:
22
7
2019
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
21
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bioelectrical impedance analysis has increasingly been incorporated into hemodialysis units (HD) as a useful, noninvasive technique for evaluating overall fluid status. The aims of this study were to verify whether the information obtained from two different bioelectrical impedance analysis methods (spectroscopy bioimpedance [BCM] and single-frequency bioelectric impedance vector analysis [SF-BIVA]) was comparable for analyzing fluid status, and to determine their impact when used to calculate dialysis dose. This observational cross-sectional study included 78 HD patients who underwent one measurement with BCM and one with SF-BIVA in the same dialysis session. For calculating the dialysis dose, total body water or urea distribution volume (V) was calculated by the Watson formula and compared with the V obtained from the two devices. The difference in V between the two devices was 5.4 L (P < 0.001). Given the existent correlation between V
Identifiants
pubmed: 31325207
doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.13424
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
154-162Informations de copyright
© 2019 International Society for Apheresis, Japanese Society for Apheresis, and Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy.
Références
Ortega O. Importancia del ajuste del peso seco en los objetivos de la diálisis adecuada. Nephrologia 1999;19:3-6.
Wabel P, Moissl U, Chamney P et al. Towards improved cardiovascular management: the necessity of combining blood pressure and fluid overload. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:2965-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfn228.
Canaud B, Lertdumrongluk P. Probing “dry weight” in haemodialysis patients: “Back to the future.”. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012;27:2140-3. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs094.
Wizemann V, Wabel P, Chamney P et al. The mortality risk of overhydration in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:1574-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfn707.
Ozkahya M, Ok E, Toz H et al. Long-term survival rates in haemodialysis patients treated with strict volume control. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:3506-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfl487.
Kooman JP, Van Der Sande FM, Leunissen KML. Wet or dry in Dialysis-can new technologies help? Semin Dial 2009;22:9-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-139X.2008.00533.x.
Prencipe M, Granata A, D'Amelio A, Romano G, Aucella F, Fiorini F. Usefulness of US imaging in overhydrated nephropathic patients. J Ultrasound 2016;19:7-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-014-0152-z.
Nongnuch A, Panorchan K, Davenport A. Predialysis NTproBNP predicts magnitude of extracellular volume overload in haemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol 2014;40:251-7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000368376.
Maduell F, Arias M, Massó E et al. Sensitivity of blood volume monitoring for fluid status assessment in hemodialysis patients. Blood Purif 2013;35:202-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000346630.
Peacock WF, Soto KM. Current techniques of fluid status assessment. Fluid Overload 2010;164:128-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783805594172.ch12.
Daugirdas JT. Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: an analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993;4:1205-13.
Daugirdas JT, Schneditz D. Overestimation of hemodialysis dose depends on dialysis efficiency by regional blood flow but not by conventional two pool urea kinetic analysis. ASAIO J 1995;41:M719-24.
Lindley EJ, Chamney PW, Wuepper A, Ingles H, Tattersall JE, Will EJ. A comparison of methods for determining urea distribution volume for routine use in on-line monitoring of haemodialysis adequacy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:211-6.
Noori N, Wald R, Parpia AS, Goldstein MB. Volume estimates in chronic hemodialysis patients by the Watson equation and bioimpedance spectroscopy and the impact on the Kt/Vurea calculation. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2018;5:1-10.
Arias-guill M, Perez E, Herrera P. Bioimpedance spectroscopy as a practical tool for the early detection and prevention of protein-energy wasting in hemodialysis patients. 2018:1-9.
Cole KS, Cole RH. Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics I. Alternating current characteristics. J Chem Phys 1941;9:341-51.
Chamney PW, Wabel P, Moissl UM et al. A whole-body model to distinguish excess fluid from the hydration of major body tissues. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85:80-9.
Moissl UM, Wabel P, Chamney PW et al. Body fluid volume determination via body composition spectroscopy in health and disease. Physiol Meas 2006;27:921-33.
Fuller NJ, Jebb SA, Laskey MA, Coward WA, Elia M. Four-component model for the assessment of body composition in humans: comparison with alternative methods, and evaluation of the density and hydration of fat-free mass. Clin Sci 1992;82:687-93.
Piccoli A, Rossi B, Pillon L, Bucciante G. A new method for monitoring body fluid variation by bioimpedance analysis: the RXc graph. Kidney Int 1994;46:534-9.
Piccoli A. Whole body - single frequency bioimpedance. Contrib Nephrol 2005;149:150-61. https://doi.org/10.1159/000085478.
Watson PE, Watson ID, Batt RD. Total body water volumes for adult males and females estimated from simple anthropometric measurements. Am J Clin Nutr 1980;33:27-39. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/33.1.27.
Lowrie EG, Chertow GM, Lew NL, Lazarus JM, Owen WF. The urea {clearance x dialysis time} product (Kt) as an outcome-based measure of hemodialysis dose. Kidney Int 1999;56:729-37.
Lin LI-K. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989;45:255-68. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532051.
Martin Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;327:307-10.
Teruel-Briones JL, Fernández-Lucas M, Ruiz-Roso G et al. Análisis de concordancia entre la bioimpedancia vectorial y la espectroscópica. Nefrologia 2012;32:389-95.
Di Iorio BR, Scalfi L, Terracciano V, Bellizzi V. A systematic evaluation of bioelectrical impedance measurement after hemodialysis session. Kidney Int 2004;65:2435-40.
Maduell F, Ramos R, Varas J et al. Hemodialysis patients receiving a greater Kt dose than recommended have reduced mortality and hospitalization risk. Kidney Int 2016;90:1332-41.
Vanholder R, Glorieux G, Eloot S. Once upon a time in dialysis: the last days of Kt/V? Kidney Int 2015;88:460-5.
Teruel JL, Alvarez Rangel LE, Fernández Lucas M et al. Control of the dialysis dose by ionic dialysance and bioimpedance. Nefrologia 2007;27:68-73.
Moret K, Beerenhout CH, van den Wall Bake AWL et al. Ionic dialysance and the assessment of Kt/V: the influence of different estimates of V on method agreement. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007;22:2276-82.
Martínez Fernández G, Ortega Cerrato A, de la Vara Iniesta L, Oliver Galera E, Gómez Roldán C, Pérez Martínez J. Comparison of bioimpedance spectroscopy and the Watson formula for measuring body volume in patients on peritoneal dialysis. Nefrologia 2016;36:57-62.
Depner T, Daugirdas J, Greene T et al. Dialysis dose and the effect of gender and body size on outcome in the HEMO study. Kidney Int 2004;65:1386-94.
Port FK, Wolfe RA, Hulbert-Shearon TE, McCullough KP, Ashby VB, Held PJ. High dialysis dose is associated with lower mortality among women but not among men. Am J Kidney Dis 2004;43:1014-23.
Spalding EM, Chandna SM, Davenport A, Farrington K. Kt/V underestimates the hemodialysis dose in women and small men. Kidney Int 2008;74:348-55.
Lowrie EG, Li Z, Ofsthun N, Lazarus JM. The online measurement of hemodialysis dose (Kt): clinical outcome as a function of body surface area. Kidney Int 2005;68:1344-54.
Fuentes AF, de FALM, González. AO et al. Guia de centros de hemodiálisis. Soc Española Nefrol 2006;145:63-79.