Discomfort/pain due to periodontal and peri-implant probing with/without platform switching.
dental implants
discomfort/pain
peri-implant probing
periodontal probing
platform switching
Journal
Clinical oral implants research
ISSN: 1600-0501
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Implants Res
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 9105713
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
28
02
2019
revised:
09
07
2019
accepted:
09
07
2019
pubmed:
22
7
2019
medline:
23
10
2019
entrez:
21
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare discomfort/pain following periodontal probing around teeth and peri-implant probing around implants with or without platform switching. Two dentists recruited and examined 65 patients, each of them exhibiting a dental implant with a contralateral tooth. Only two types of implants were included: one with and one without platform switching. Periodontal and peri-implant probing depths (PPD) and probing attachment level (PAL) were assessed. Whether implant or tooth was measured first was randomly assigned. Immediately after probing, patients scored discomfort/pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The emergence profiles of implant crowns were assessed as angles between interproximal surfaces on radiographs. Sixty-five patients (age 69; 63/76 years [median; lower/upper quartile]; 38 females, 11 smokers) were examined. With the exception of mean PPD and PAL (p < .05) clinical parameters (PPD, PAL, bleeding on probing, suppuration) were well balanced between implants and teeth. Peri-implant probing (VAS: 10; 0.75/16.25) caused significantly (p < .001) more discomfort/pain than periodontal probing (4; 0/10). Logistic regression analysis identified a larger difference between discomfort/pain for peri-implant and periodontal probing in the maxilla than the mandible (p = .003). Comparing discomfort/pain between implants maxilla (p = .006) and emergence profile (p = .015) were associated with discomfort/pain. Type of implant (with/without platform switching) had no significant effect on discomfort/pain. Peri-implant probing caused significantly more discomfort/pain than periodontal probing. Implant design with/without platform switching failed to have a significant effect on discomfort/pain.
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Pagination
997-1004Subventions
Organisme : German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Berglundh, T., Armitage, G., Araujo, M. G., Avila-Ortiz, G., Blanco, J., Camargo, P. M., … Zitzmann, N. (2018). Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. Journal of Periodontology, 89(Suppl 1), S313-S318. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0739
Canakci, V., & Canakci, C. F. (2007). Pain levels in patients during periodontal probing and mechanical non-surgical therapy. Clinical Oral Investigations, 11(4), 377-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0126-z
Cohen, M. E., & Ralls, S. A. (1988). False positive rates in the determination of changes in probing depth-related periodontal measurements. Journal of Periodontal Research, 23(3), 161-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1988.tb01351.x
Elez, I., Parvini, P., Stanner, J., Klum, M., & Eickholz, P. (2018). Intra- und interindividuelle Reproduzierbarkeit der Erhebung von Sondierungsparametern an Zähnen und enossalen Implantaten bei unterschiedlichen Implantatsystemen. Parodontologie, 4(29), 337-345.
Etter, T. H., Hakanson, I., Lang, N. P., Trejo, P. M., & Caffesse, R. G. (2002). Healing after standardized clinical probing of the perlimplant soft tissue seal: A histomorphometric study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 13(6), 571-580. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130601.x
Hassan, M. A., Bogle, G., Quishenbery, M., Stephens, D., Riggs, M., & Egelberg, J. (2005). Pain experienced by patients during periodontal recall examination using thinner versus thicker probes. Journal of Periodontology, 76(6), 980-984. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.6.980
Heft, M. W., Perelmuter, S. H., Cooper, B. Y., Magnusson, I., & Clark, W. B. (1991). Relationship between gingival inflammation and painfulness of periodontal probing. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 18(3), 213-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb01137.x
Heins, P. J., Karpinia, K. A., Maruniak, J. W., Moorhead, J. E., & Gibbs, C. H. (1998). Pain threshold values during periodontal probing: Assessment of maxillary incisor and molar sites. Journal of Periodontology, 69(7), 812-818. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.7.812
Heitz-Mayfield, L. J. (2008). Peri-implant diseases: Diagnosis and risk indicators. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 35(8 Suppl), 292-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01275.x
Lang, N. P., & Tonetti, M. S. (2003). Periodontal risk assessment (PRA) for patients in supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry, 1(1), 7-16.
Lang, N. P., Wilson, T. G., & Corbet, E. F. (2000). Biological complications with dental implants: Their prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 11(Suppl 1), 146-155. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1146.x
Lindhe, J., Meyle, J., & Group D of European Workshop on Periodontology (2008). Peri-implant diseases: Consensus report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 35(8 Suppl), 282-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01283.x
Muller, N., Moene, R., Cancela, J. A., & Mombelli, A. (2014). Subgingival air-polishing with erythritol during periodontal maintenance: Randomized clinical trial of twelve months. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 41(9), 883-889. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12289
Ringeling, J., Parvini, P., Weinbach, C., Nentwig, G. H., Nickles, K., & Eickholz, P. (2016). Discomfort/pain due to pocket probing at teeth and endosseous implants: A cross-sectional study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 27(8), 1005-1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12669
Rinke, S., Tsigaras, A., Huels, A., & Roediger, M. (2011). An 18-year retrospective evaluation of glass-infiltrated alumina crowns. Quintessence International, 42(8), 625-633.
Röllke, L., Schacher, B., Wohlfeil, M., Kim, T.-S., Kaltschmitt, J., Krieger, J., … Eickholz, P. (2012). Regenerative therapy of infrabony defects with or without systemic doxycycline. A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 39(5), 448-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01861.x
Stanner, J., Klum, M., Parvini, P., Zuhr, O., Nickles, K., & Eickholz, P. (2017). Discomfort/pain due to periodontal and peri-implant probing: Implant type and age. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 44(7), 749-755. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12741
Thierbach, R., & Eger, T. (2013). Clinical outcome of a nonsurgical and surgical treatment protocol in different types of peri-implantitis: A case series. Quintessence International, 44(2), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a28929
Thong, I. S. K., Jensen, M. P., Miro, J., & Tan, G. (2018). The validity of pain intensity measures: What do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure? Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 18(1), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2018-0012