The Quality of Interactions Between Staff and Residents With Cognitive Impairment in Nursing Homes.
cognitive impairment
communication
long-term care
nursing homes
staff–resident interactions
Journal
American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias
ISSN: 1938-2731
Titre abrégé: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101082834
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pmc-release:
21
01
2021
pubmed:
23
7
2019
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
23
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Positive and effective staff-resident interactions are imperative to adequately assess and meet the needs of cognitively impaired residents in nursing homes and optimize their quality of life. The purpose of this study was to quantify, describe, and analyze the interaction between staff and cognitively impaired residents in nursing homes, using the Quality of Interaction Schedule (QuIS). This descriptive analysis utilized baseline data from the first 2 cohorts in a randomized clinical trial including 341 residents from 35 nursing homes. Five hundred fifty-six staff-resident interactions were evaluated; majority were positive (n = 466, 83.8%) and the remaining were either neutral (n = 60, 10.8%) or negative (n = 30, 5.4%). The quality of interactions varied by interaction location, interpersonal distance, and resident participation. Future research should focus on decreasing the negative/neutral interactions and explore staff characteristics (eg, gender, level of experience) and facility factors (eg, size, ownership) that might influence the quality of interactions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Positive and effective staff-resident interactions are imperative to adequately assess and meet the needs of cognitively impaired residents in nursing homes and optimize their quality of life.
AIM
The purpose of this study was to quantify, describe, and analyze the interaction between staff and cognitively impaired residents in nursing homes, using the Quality of Interaction Schedule (QuIS).
METHOD
This descriptive analysis utilized baseline data from the first 2 cohorts in a randomized clinical trial including 341 residents from 35 nursing homes.
RESULTS
Five hundred fifty-six staff-resident interactions were evaluated; majority were positive (n = 466, 83.8%) and the remaining were either neutral (n = 60, 10.8%) or negative (n = 30, 5.4%). The quality of interactions varied by interaction location, interpersonal distance, and resident participation.
CONCLUSION
Future research should focus on decreasing the negative/neutral interactions and explore staff characteristics (eg, gender, level of experience) and facility factors (eg, size, ownership) that might influence the quality of interactions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31327235
doi: 10.1177/1533317519863259
pmc: PMC6980162
mid: NIHMS1050573
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1533317519863259Subventions
Organisme : NINR NIH HHS
ID : R01 NR015982
Pays : United States
Références
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Nov;27(11):1861-73
pubmed: 26165352
PLoS Med. 2018 Feb 6;15(2):e1002500
pubmed: 29408901
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Sep;13(7):611-7
pubmed: 22796362
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jul;19(7):613-618
pubmed: 29191763
Aging Ment Health. 2014 Sep;18(7):921-8
pubmed: 24679128
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jan;66:37-46
pubmed: 27951433
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Aug;28(8):1323-31
pubmed: 27068245
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Nov;56(11):2069-75
pubmed: 19016941
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Feb;54:112-21
pubmed: 26087703
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 31;17(1):380
pubmed: 28569151
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 1;12(8):e0180395
pubmed: 28763445
J Gerontol Nurs. 2017 Jan 1;43(1):34-43
pubmed: 27711932
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2009 Oct-Nov;24(5):417-23
pubmed: 19692706
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2009 Oct;2(4):267-75
pubmed: 20077983
Aging Ment Health. 2015;19(5):444-52
pubmed: 25117793
Aging Ment Health. 2007 May;11(3):237-45
pubmed: 17558574
Gerontologist. 2017 Aug 1;57(4):707-718
pubmed: 27048705
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 May;49(5):508-18
pubmed: 22078076
Gerontologist. 2005 Oct;45 Spec No 1(1):133-46
pubmed: 16230760
Gerontologist. 2018 Jul 13;58(4):e291-e301
pubmed: 29718195
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Apr;26(4):645-55
pubmed: 24284201
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2017 Feb;32(1):41-50
pubmed: 27899433
Gerontologist. 2007 Feb;47(1):69-77
pubmed: 17327542
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Oct;75:154-162
pubmed: 28826065
Clin Nurs Res. 1998 May;7(2):189-206
pubmed: 9633339
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Jan;25(1):128-39
pubmed: 22840185
Int Psychogeriatr. 2010 Mar;22(2):189-200
pubmed: 19638257
Res Nurs Health. 2018 Jun;41(3):228-242
pubmed: 29485197
Vital Health Stat 3. 2016 Feb;(38):x-xii; 1-105
pubmed: 27023287