A Collaborative Approach to Pain Control Reduces In-hospital Opioid Use and Improves Range of Motion following Total Knee Arthroplasty.
adductor canal block
periarticular injection
total knee arthroplasty
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 May 2019
16 May 2019
Historique:
entrez:
23
7
2019
pubmed:
23
7
2019
medline:
23
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Opioid pain medications are commonly prescribed following orthopedic procedures, with overprescribing of these pain medications implicated as a driver of the current opioid epidemic. In an effort to reduce reliance on opioid pain medications, surgeons are relying on periarticular injections or peripheral nerve blocks. The purpose of this study was to compare numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores and oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) in patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a periarticular injection alone to those who underwent a collaborative approach with a periarticular injection in the posterior tissue and an adductor canal catheter for anterior knee analgesia. In this study, 236 patients underwent a primary TKA between December 2017 and April 2018. Forty patients received an adductor canal catheter and 196 underwent a periarticular injection alone. We found no difference in patient demographics between the cohorts (p>0.05). The patients that underwent the collaborative approach with a periarticular injection and adductor canal catheter had lower NRS pain scores on post-operative day 0, 1, and 2 (all P≤0.033). These patients demonstrated a reduction of 43% in opioid consumption during the hospitalization (P<0.001). These patients also demonstrated improved range of motion (ROM) (96 vs. 92 degrees) on the day of discharge (P=0.013). This study provides strong evidence that in patients undergoing TKA, the collaborative approach with the adductor canal catheter and periarticular injection is associated with lower post-operative pain scores, fewer total OMEs per hospital day, and a greater ROM arc prior to discharge compared to patients receiving a periarticular injection alone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31328069
doi: 10.7759/cureus.4678
pmc: PMC6634338
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e4678Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Arthroplasty. 2001 Jun;16(4):436-45
pubmed: 11402405
Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):534-40, table of contents
pubmed: 12873949
J Pain. 2003 Sep;4(7):361-71
pubmed: 14622678
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5
pubmed: 17403800
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jul;90(7):1598-605
pubmed: 18594111
Anesthesiology. 2010 Nov;113(5):1014-5
pubmed: 20881593
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):334-9
pubmed: 23759708
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):526-32
pubmed: 24121608
Orthopedics. 2015 Jul 1;38(7):e616-25
pubmed: 26186325
Int Orthop. 2016 May;40(5):925-33
pubmed: 26452678
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Aug;31(8):1649-1653.e1
pubmed: 26961087
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Oct;41(10):947-957.e3
pubmed: 27692801
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Oct 19;98(20):e89
pubmed: 27869630
Pain Pract. 2018 Apr;18(4):487-499
pubmed: 28851016
Int J Surg. 2017 Nov;47:135-146
pubmed: 28919091
JAMA Surg. 2018 Jan 1;153(1):37-43
pubmed: 28973092
Orthop Clin North Am. 2018 Jan;49(1):7-16
pubmed: 29145987
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2440-2448
pubmed: 29691180
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):183-189
pubmed: 30360981