Treatment strategies for patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: interval debulking surgery or additional chemotherapy?
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ metabolism
CA-125 Antigen
/ metabolism
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Disease-Free Survival
Fallopian Tube Neoplasms
/ mortality
Female
Humans
Membrane Proteins
/ metabolism
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Ovarian Neoplasms
/ mortality
Peritoneal Neoplasms
/ mortality
Retrospective Studies
CA-125 Antigen
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Ovarian Neoplasm
Journal
Journal of gynecologic oncology
ISSN: 2005-0399
Titre abrégé: J Gynecol Oncol
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101483150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
28
12
2018
revised:
01
03
2019
accepted:
18
03
2019
entrez:
23
7
2019
pubmed:
23
7
2019
medline:
11
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To treat advanced ovarian cancer, interval debulking surgery (IDS) is performed after 3 cycles each of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and postoperative chemotherapy (IDS group). If we expect that complete resection cannot be achieved by IDS, debulking surgery is performed after administering additional 3 cycles of chemotherapy without postoperative chemotherapy (Add-C group). We evaluated the survival outcomes of the Add-C group and determined their serum cancer antigen 125 (CA125) levels to predict complete surgery. A retrospective chart review of all stage III and IV ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer patients treated with NAC in 2007-2016 was conducted. About 117 patients comprised the IDS group and 26 comprised the Add-C group. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that Add-C group had an equivalent effect on progression-free survival (PFS; p=0.09) and overall survival (OS; p=0.94) compared with the IDS group. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients who developed residual disease after surgery had worse PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.45-3.28) and OS (HR=2.33; 95% CI=1.43-3.79), and those who received <6 cycles of chemotherapy had worse PFS (HR=5.30; 95% CI=2.56-10.99) and OS (HR=3.05; 95% CI=1.46-6.38). The preoperative serum CA125 cutoff level was 30 U/mL based on Youden index method. Administering 3 additional cycles of chemotherapy followed by debulking surgery exhibited equivalent effects on survival as IDS followed by 3 cycles of postoperative chemotherapy. Preoperative serum CA125 levels of ≤30 U/mL may be a useful predictor of achieving complete surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31328461
pii: 30.e81
doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e81
pmc: PMC6658596
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
CA-125 Antigen
0
MUC16 protein, human
0
Membrane Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e81Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Références
Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5
pubmed: 15405679
Cancer. 2009 Mar 15;115(6):1234-44
pubmed: 19189349
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jul;114(1):26-31
pubmed: 19395008
N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 2;363(10):943-53
pubmed: 20818904
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Dec;159(2):407-12
pubmed: 21835539
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 May;125(2):362-6
pubmed: 22333992
J Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Apr;24(2):141-5
pubmed: 23653831
Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi24-32
pubmed: 24078660
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Nov;135(2):223-30
pubmed: 25220627
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Dec;135(3):542-6
pubmed: 25223808
Lancet. 2015 Jul 18;386(9990):249-57
pubmed: 26002111
Eur J Cancer. 2016 May;59:22-33
pubmed: 26998845
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Sep;64:22-31
pubmed: 27323348
J Ovarian Res. 2016 Sep 27;9(1):61
pubmed: 27677313
Oncology. 2016;91(6):331-340
pubmed: 27784027
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Feb;295(2):451-458
pubmed: 27913927
J Cancer. 2016 Nov 25;7(15):2327-2332
pubmed: 27994671
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 5;12(9):e0183754
pubmed: 28873393
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;44(6):760-765
pubmed: 29426779