Systematic review of alternative access for cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: Dorsal distal radial and ulnar artery catheterization.
acute myocardial infarction
radial
snuff box
stent
ulnar
Journal
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
ISSN: 1522-726X
Titre abrégé: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100884139
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Nov 2019
01 Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
22
02
2019
revised:
18
05
2019
accepted:
04
07
2019
pubmed:
23
7
2019
medline:
26
8
2020
entrez:
23
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The femoral and radial arteries are the standard access routes for cardiac catheterization. In cases where the right radial artery has been previously utilized or is not suitable for repeat procedures, the left dorsal distal radial artery (anatomical snuff box) or the ulnar artery may be an alternative access site. In this systematic review, alternative access sites are described along with the techniques of cannulation, technical considerations, ultrasound imaging, clinical studies, and their complications. As we routinely perform more radial procedures, increased complications will arise, so it becomes important to gain expertise in alternative access for future coronary interventions. Such a systematic review has not been previously published so it will enhance the reader's knowledge of alternative access.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
706-713Informations de copyright
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
Valsecchi O, Vassileva A, Cereda AF, et al. Early clinical experience with right and left distal Transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox in 52 consecutive patients. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018;30(6):218-223.
Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(24):2481-2489.
Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9986):2465-2476.
Pristipino C, Trani C, Nazzaro MS, et al. Major improvement of percutaneous cardiovascular procedure outcomes with radial artery catheterisation: results from the PREVAIL study. Heart. 2009;95(6):476-482.
Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). EuroIntervention. 2017;13(7):851-857.
Roh JH, Lee JH. Distal radial approach through the anatomical snuff box for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. Korean Circ J. 2018;48(12):1131-1134.
Davies RE, Gilchrist IC. Back hand approach to radial access: the snuff box approach. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018;19(3 Pt B):324-326.
Corcos T. Distal radial access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a state-of-the-art review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93(4): 639-644. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28016
Kar S. Transulnar cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: techniques, transradial comparisons, anatomical considerations, and comprehensive literature review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;90(7):1126-1134.
Seto AH, Roberts JS, Abu-Fadel MS, et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates transradial access: RAUST (radial artery access with ultrasound trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(2):283-291.
Seto AH, Abu-Fadel MS, Sparling JM, et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates femoral arterial access and reduces vascular complications: FAUST (femoral arterial access with ultrasound trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(7):751-758.
Hahalis G, Aznaouridis K, Tsigkas G, et al. Radial artery and ulnar artery occlusions following coronary procedures and the impact of anticoagulation: ARTEMIS (radial and ulnar ARTEry occlusion meta-AnalysIS) systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(8):1-58.
Latsios G, Toutouzas K, Synetos A, et al. Left distal radial artery for cardiac catheterization: insights from our first experience. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2018;59:352-353.
Choi S, Park JM, Nam SH, Kim EJ. Cannulation of the dorsal radial artery: an underused, yet useful, technique. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014;67(Suppl):S11-S12.
Peruga JP, Peruga JZ, Kasprzak JD, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of forearm arteries in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention via radial artery access: results of one-year follow-up. Kardiol pol. 2015;73(7):502-510.
Kotowycz MA, Johnston KW, Ivanov J, et al. Predictors of radial artery size in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization: insights from the good radial artery size prediction (GRASP) study. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30(2):211-216.
Ashraf T, Panhwar Z, Habib S, Memon MA, Shamsi F, Arif J. Size of radial and ulnar artery in local population. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010;60(10):817-819.
Geng W, Fu X, Gu X, et al. Safety and feasibility of transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary catheterization in non-selective patients. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(7):1222-1228.
Al-Azizi KM, Lotfi AS. The distal left radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention: a new era. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018;19(8S):35-40.
Al-Azizi KM, Grewal V, Gobeil K, et al. The left distal trans-radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention: a US experience. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018;S1553-8389(18):30463-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2018.10.023.
Coughlan JJ, Zebrauskaite A, Arnous S, Kiernan TJ. Left distal trans-radial access facilitates earlier discharge post-coronary angiography. J Interv Cardiol. 2018;31(6):964-968.
Roghani-Dehkordi F, Hashemifard O, Sadeghi M, et al. Distal accesses in the hand (two novel techniques) for percutaneous coronary angiography and intervention. ARYA Atheroscler. 2018;14(2):95-100.
Roghani-Dehkordi F, Mansouri R, Khosravi A, Mahaki B, Akbarzadeh M, Kermani-Alghoraishi M. Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: considering their complications. ARYA Atheroscler. 2018;14(3):128-131.
Soydan E, Akin M. Coronary angiography using the left distal radial approach - an alternative site to conventional radial coronary angiography. Anatol J Cardiol. 2018;19(4):243-248.
Koutouzis M, Kontopodis E, Tassopoulos A, et al. Distal versus traditional radial approach for coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018;S1553-8389(18)30439-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2018.09.018.
Terashima M, Meguro T, Takeda H, et al. Percutaneous ulnar artery approach for coronary angiography: a preliminary report in nine patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;53(3):410-414.
Limbruno U, Rossini R, De Carlo M, et al. Percutaneous ulnar artery approach for primary coronary angioplasty: safety and feasibility. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;61(1):56-59.
Dashkoff N, Dashkoff PB, Zizzi JA Sr, Wadhwani J, Zizzi JA Jr. Ulnar artery cannulation for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: case reports and anatomic considerations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002;55(1):93-96.
Hahalis G, Tsigkas G, Xanthopoulou I, et al. Transulnar compared with transradial artery approach as a default strategy for coronary procedures: a randomized trial. The Transulnar or Transradial instead of coronary Transfemoral angiographies study (the AURA of ARTEMIS study). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(3):252-261.
Gokhroo R, Bisht D, Padmanabhan D, Gupta S, Kishor K, Ranwa B. Feasibility of ulnar artery for cardiac catheterization: AJmer ULnar ARtery (AJULAR) catheterization study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86(1):42-48.
Gokhroo R, Kishor K, Ranwa B, et al. Ulnar artery interventions non-inferior to radial approach: AJmer ulnar ARtery (AJULAR) intervention working group study results. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016;28(1):1-8.
Aptecar E, Pernes JM, Chabane-Chaouch M, et al. Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: the PCVI-Cuba study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;67(5):711-720.
Fernandez R, Zaky F, Ekmejian A, Curtis E, Lee A. Safety and efficacy of ulnar artery approach for percutaneous cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91(7):1273-1280.
Dahal K, Rijal J, Lee J, Korr KS, Azrin M. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87(5):857-865.
Gatzopoulos D, Rigatou A, Kontopodis E, et al. Alternative access site choice after initial radial access site failure for coronary angiography and intervention. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018;15(9):585-590.
Agostoni P, Zuffi A, Faurie B, et al. Same wrist intervention via the cubital (ulnar) artery in case of radial puncture failure for percutaneous cardiac catheterization or intervention: the multicenter SWITCH registry. Int J Cardiol. 2013;169(1):52-56.
Kedev S, Zafirovska B, Dharma S, Petkoska D. Safety and feasibility of transulnar catheterization when ipsilateral radial access is not available. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83(1):E51-E60.
Koutouzis M, Kontopodis E, Tassopoulos A, Tsiafoutis I, Lazaris E. Hand hematoma after cardiac catheterization via distal radial artery. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018;30(11):428.
Liu J, Fu XH, Xue L, Wu WL, Gu XS, Li SQ. A comparative study of transulnar and transradial artery access for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome. J Interv Cardiol. 2014;27(5):525-530.
Sattur S, Singh M, Kaluski E. Transulnar access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2014;26(8):404-408.