Rebuilding global fisheries under uncertainty.


Journal

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 08 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 25 7 2019
medline: 31 3 2020
entrez: 24 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Current and future prospects for successfully rebuilding global fisheries remain debated due to uncertain stock status, variable management success, and disruptive environmental change. While scientists routinely account for some of this uncertainty in population models, the mechanisms by which this translates into decision-making and policy are problematic and can lead to unintentional overexploitation. Here, we explicitly track the role of measurement uncertainty and environmental variation in the decision-making process for setting catch quotas. Analyzing 109 well-sampled stocks from all oceans, we show that current practices may attain 55% recovery on average, while richer decision methods borrowed from robotics yield 85% recovery of global stocks by midcentury, higher economic returns, and greater robustness to environmental surprises. These results challenge the consensus that global fisheries can be rebuilt by existing approaches alone, while also underscoring that rebuilding stocks may still be achieved by improved decision-making tools that optimally manage this uncertainty.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31332004
pii: 1902657116
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902657116
pmc: PMC6689946
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

15985-15990

Références

Science. 2006 Nov 3;314(5800):787-90
pubmed: 17082450
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 16;105(37):13936-40
pubmed: 18779594
Science. 2009 Jul 31;325(5940):578-85
pubmed: 19644114
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Oct;24(10):549-54
pubmed: 19665820
Conserv Biol. 2011 Aug;25(4):777-86
pubmed: 21535149
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Aug;26(8):398-404
pubmed: 21616553
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):6229-34
pubmed: 23530207
J Environ Manage. 2014 Jan 15;133:27-36
pubmed: 24355689
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 3;113(18):5125-9
pubmed: 27035953
Nat Commun. 2017 May 19;8:15325
pubmed: 28524851
Science. 2018 Mar 16;359(6381):1255-1258
pubmed: 29590074
Ecol Lett. 2018 Aug;21(8):1255-1267
pubmed: 29790295
Am Nat. 2019 May;193(5):645-660
pubmed: 31002569

Auteurs

Milad Memarzadeh (M)

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; memarzadeh.milad@gmail.com cboettig@berkeley.edu.

Gregory L Britten (GL)

Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697.
Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.

Boris Worm (B)

Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, Canada.

Carl Boettiger (C)

Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 memarzadeh.milad@gmail.com cboettig@berkeley.edu.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH