Combined endoscopic and intra-oral approach for chronic maxillary sinusitis of dental origin-a prospective clinical study.
Antrostomy
Buccal fat pad
Caldwell-Luc
Endoscopy
Maxillary sinusitis
Journal
Oral and maxillofacial surgery
ISSN: 1865-1569
Titre abrégé: Oral Maxillofac Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101319632
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
14
08
2018
accepted:
10
07
2019
pubmed:
25
7
2019
medline:
27
11
2019
entrez:
24
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The traditional Caldwell-Luc approach for maxillary diseases has been criticized for its shortcomings such as removal of a large amount of bone, numbness of the teeth, flap dehiscence, and recurrent sinusitis. On account of its minimal invasiveness and physiological approach, functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) has come to replace the Caldwell-Luc approach for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Chronic maxillary sinusitis of dental origin (CMSDO) is a less common variant on the chronic rhinosinusitis spectrum whose treatment involves simultaneous management of both the diseased maxillary sinus and the dental source of infection. Thus, this study was undertaken to assess the efficacy of FESS when combined with an intra-oral approach for the treatment of CMSDO. Eighteen patients with CMSDO in the age group of 18-50 years were treated with a combined endoscopic and intra-oral approach (buccal advancement flap with/without buccal fat pad) in this study. The patients were followed up for a total duration of 18 months. The primary outcome measurements were the SNOT-22 Quality of Life questionnaire and the Lund and Mackay CT Scan Scoring Criteria. The Friedman test was used to assess improvement in the above variables and the level of significance was set at 0.05. There was a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.05) in both the above parameters at all post-operative intervals. Two patients presented with epistaxis (immediate post-operative phase) and synechiae (second week follow-up interval). Both complications were successfully resolved. Two patients showed recurrence at the 6th-month interval for which they underwent revision surgery successfully. Overall, results were maintained even at the 18th month follow-up interval. The endoscopic approach appears to be a reliable, minimally invasive technique associated with less morbidity and stable long-term results. Thus, a multi-disciplinary approach between maxillofacial surgeons and otolaryngologists is essential in the treatment of CMSDO.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31332583
doi: 10.1007/s10006-019-00792-z
pii: 10.1007/s10006-019-00792-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
429-437Références
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Apr;109(4):510-6
pubmed: 20156695
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Sep;70(9):2080-4
pubmed: 22209108
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jun;24(6):623-9
pubmed: 22404380
Laryngoscope. 2011 Dec;121(12):2684-701
pubmed: 22086769
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Mar;67(3):689-92
pubmed: 19231804
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 May;158(5):783-800
pubmed: 29405833
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 May;25(3):991-4
pubmed: 24705238
Int J Otolaryngol. 2014;2014:465173
pubmed: 24817890
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Sep;117(3 Pt 2):S1-7
pubmed: 9334782
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Feb;65(2):223-8
pubmed: 17236925
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2018 Mar 25;3(2):110-114
pubmed: 29721543
Am J Otolaryngol. 2013 Jul-Aug;34(4):323-6
pubmed: 23357594
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Feb;109(2):e8-12
pubmed: 20034819
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Feb;142(2):196-201
pubmed: 20115974
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011 Sep-Oct;1(5):409-15
pubmed: 22287475
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Mar;77(3):546-554
pubmed: 30448431
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 May;62(5):559-62
pubmed: 15122559
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Dec;114(6 Suppl):155-212
pubmed: 15577865
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Aug;73(8):1452-6
pubmed: 25970515
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1990;247(2):63-76
pubmed: 2180446
Laryngoscope. 2002 Jun;112(6):1056-9
pubmed: 12160273
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;137(4):555-61
pubmed: 17903570
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012 Oct;45(5):1019-32
pubmed: 22980682
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1989 Nov;98(11):901-6
pubmed: 2817683
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010 Jan 01;15(1):e70-3
pubmed: 19767698
J Laryngol Otol. 2010 Mar;124(3):242-50
pubmed: 19930748
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Mar;26(2):e84-6
pubmed: 25723658
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Dec 22;14:Doc08
pubmed: 26770282
Clin Otolaryngol. 2012 Aug;37(4):276-82
pubmed: 22776038
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jul;44(7):889-91
pubmed: 25702587
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Jan;6(1):41-5
pubmed: 26345711
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Apr;273(4):905-9
pubmed: 26006724
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011 Nov-Dec;1(6):417-30
pubmed: 22144050
Acta Odontol Scand. 2017 Nov;75(8):623-633
pubmed: 28877613
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Apr;146(4):533-8
pubmed: 22241787
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jul;63(3):214-9
pubmed: 22754797