The Effect of Workers' Compensation Status on the Patient Experience.
Journal
JB & JS open access
ISSN: 2472-7245
Titre abrégé: JB JS Open Access
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101726219
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
24
7
2019
pubmed:
25
7
2019
medline:
25
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rating the patient experience is an increasingly important component of value-based health care. Generation of lower ratings on validated functional assessments by patients with Workers' Compensation is well known; however, the relationship between Workers' Compensation status and patient satisfaction is poorly described in orthopaedic patient populations. All orthopaedic outpatient patient satisfaction surveys (Press Ganey) generated over an 18-month period at a U.S. academic tertiary care center were included in this study. Data with regard to the primary payer, demographic characteristics, orthopaedic subspecialty, and planned surgical interventions with the provider for whom the survey was completed were analyzed in conjunction with patient satisfaction data. During the study period, 3,720 consecutive patient satisfaction surveys were generated, and 244 surveys were generated by 215 patients with Workers' Compensation. Satisfied patients with Workers' Compensation were more likely to be male (p = 0.0007), to have higher mental health self-assessments (p = 0.004), and to be scheduled for surgical intervention (p = 0.03). Scheduling a surgical procedure was independently associated with improved patient satisfaction, whereas Workers' Compensation status was independently associated with dissatisfaction when adjusting for sex, language, race, and marital status. Across all patient satisfaction domains, patients with Workers' Compensation gave significantly lower scores (p < 0.05) compared with all other patients. Patients with Workers' Compensation were more likely to rate their overall health as lower compared with other patients (p < 0.0001). Patients with Workers' Compensation were more likely to give lower ratings to providers on a 1-to-10 scale (p < 0.0001) and were less likely to recommend the practice to others (p < 0.0001). Workers' Compensation status is a non-modifiable independent predictor of dissatisfaction with health care compared with other primary payer groups. Further research is warranted to understand the factors influencing patient satisfaction ratings.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Rating the patient experience is an increasingly important component of value-based health care. Generation of lower ratings on validated functional assessments by patients with Workers' Compensation is well known; however, the relationship between Workers' Compensation status and patient satisfaction is poorly described in orthopaedic patient populations.
METHODS
METHODS
All orthopaedic outpatient patient satisfaction surveys (Press Ganey) generated over an 18-month period at a U.S. academic tertiary care center were included in this study. Data with regard to the primary payer, demographic characteristics, orthopaedic subspecialty, and planned surgical interventions with the provider for whom the survey was completed were analyzed in conjunction with patient satisfaction data.
RESULTS
RESULTS
During the study period, 3,720 consecutive patient satisfaction surveys were generated, and 244 surveys were generated by 215 patients with Workers' Compensation. Satisfied patients with Workers' Compensation were more likely to be male (p = 0.0007), to have higher mental health self-assessments (p = 0.004), and to be scheduled for surgical intervention (p = 0.03). Scheduling a surgical procedure was independently associated with improved patient satisfaction, whereas Workers' Compensation status was independently associated with dissatisfaction when adjusting for sex, language, race, and marital status. Across all patient satisfaction domains, patients with Workers' Compensation gave significantly lower scores (p < 0.05) compared with all other patients. Patients with Workers' Compensation were more likely to rate their overall health as lower compared with other patients (p < 0.0001). Patients with Workers' Compensation were more likely to give lower ratings to providers on a 1-to-10 scale (p < 0.0001) and were less likely to recommend the practice to others (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Workers' Compensation status is a non-modifiable independent predictor of dissatisfaction with health care compared with other primary payer groups. Further research is warranted to understand the factors influencing patient satisfaction ratings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31334458
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00003
pii: JBJSOA-D-19-00003
pmc: PMC6613855
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e0003Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Jan;82(1):4-15
pubmed: 10653079
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Oct 15;29(20):2309-18
pubmed: 15480147
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90(10):2105-13
pubmed: 18829907
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Oct 6;92(13):2294-9
pubmed: 20926723
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 May 18;93(10):929-36
pubmed: 21593368
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Mar 12;172(5):405-11
pubmed: 22331982
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Mar 21;94(6):523-30
pubmed: 22438001
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Mar;22(3):409-17
pubmed: 22939405
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 17;368(3):201-3
pubmed: 23268647
JAMA Surg. 2013 Apr;148(4):362-7
pubmed: 23715968
J Healthc Manag. 2013 Sep-Oct;58(5):320-34; discussion 334-5
pubmed: 24195341
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jan 15;96(2):106-12
pubmed: 24430409
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1769-80
pubmed: 24787355
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 May 20;97(10):824-8
pubmed: 25995493
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Jul 1;97(13):1041-8
pubmed: 26135070
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 04;16(a):350
pubmed: 27488567
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Oct 5;98(19):e83
pubmed: 27707857
Spine J. 2016 Nov;16(11):1290-1291
pubmed: 27832879
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9S):S109-S112
pubmed: 28189440
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):783-785
pubmed: 29096971
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):85-91
pubmed: 29181542
J Occup Environ Med. 2018 May;60(5):e227-e231
pubmed: 29642097