Indocyanine green fluorescence videoangiography for reliable variations of supraclavicular artery flaps.

Indocyanine green Reconstructive surgical procedure Surgical flaps

Journal

Archives of plastic surgery
ISSN: 2234-6163
Titre abrégé: Arch Plast Surg
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101577999

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Historique:
received: 23 12 2018
accepted: 24 05 2019
entrez: 24 7 2019
pubmed: 25 7 2019
medline: 25 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pedicled flaps are useful for reconstructive surgery. Previously, we often used vascularized supraclavicular flaps, especially for head and neck reconstruction, but then shifted to using thoracic branch of the supraclavicular artery (TBSA) flaps. However, limited research exists on the anatomy of TBSA flaps and on the use of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence videoangiography for supraclavicular artery flaps. We utilized ICG fluorescence videoangiography to harvest reliable flaps in reconstructive operations, and describe the results herein. Data were retrospectively reviewed from six patients (five men and one woman: average age, 54 years; range, 48-60 years) for whom ICG videoangiography was performed to observe the skin perfusion of a supraclavicular flap after it was raised. Areas where the flap showed good enhancement were considered to be favorable for flap survival. The observation of ICG dye indicated good skin perfusion, which is predictive of flap survival; therefore, we trimmed any areas without dye filling and used the remaining viable part of the flap. The flaps ranged in size from 13×5.5 cm to 17×6.5 cm. One patient received a conventional supraclavicular flap, four patients received a TBSA flap, and one patient received a flap that was considered to be intermediate between a supraclavicular flap and a TBSA flap. The flaps completely survived in all cases, and no flap necrosis was observed. The TBSA flap is very useful in reconstructive surgery, and reliable flaps could be obtained by using ICG fluorescence videoangiography intraoperatively.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pedicled flaps are useful for reconstructive surgery. Previously, we often used vascularized supraclavicular flaps, especially for head and neck reconstruction, but then shifted to using thoracic branch of the supraclavicular artery (TBSA) flaps. However, limited research exists on the anatomy of TBSA flaps and on the use of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence videoangiography for supraclavicular artery flaps. We utilized ICG fluorescence videoangiography to harvest reliable flaps in reconstructive operations, and describe the results herein.
METHODS METHODS
Data were retrospectively reviewed from six patients (five men and one woman: average age, 54 years; range, 48-60 years) for whom ICG videoangiography was performed to observe the skin perfusion of a supraclavicular flap after it was raised. Areas where the flap showed good enhancement were considered to be favorable for flap survival. The observation of ICG dye indicated good skin perfusion, which is predictive of flap survival; therefore, we trimmed any areas without dye filling and used the remaining viable part of the flap.
RESULTS RESULTS
The flaps ranged in size from 13×5.5 cm to 17×6.5 cm. One patient received a conventional supraclavicular flap, four patients received a TBSA flap, and one patient received a flap that was considered to be intermediate between a supraclavicular flap and a TBSA flap. The flaps completely survived in all cases, and no flap necrosis was observed.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The TBSA flap is very useful in reconstructive surgery, and reliable flaps could be obtained by using ICG fluorescence videoangiography intraoperatively.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31336419
pii: aps.2018.01536
doi: 10.5999/aps.2018.01536
pmc: PMC6657196
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

318-323

Références

Clin Anat. 2009 Mar;22(2):215-20
pubmed: 19089996
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Apr;125(4):1065-73
pubmed: 20335859
Burns. 2012 Sep;38(6):924-30
pubmed: 22360964
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 May;129(5):1043-8
pubmed: 22544087
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Apr;66(4):489-96
pubmed: 23273641
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Feb;67(2):198-204
pubmed: 24189308
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jan;154(1):66-72
pubmed: 26467355
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Sep;34(7):499-508
pubmed: 29775982
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Aug 04;4(2):148-152
pubmed: 30101227
Br J Plast Surg. 1979 Jul;32(3):207-12
pubmed: 380704
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Jun;99(7):1878-84; discussion 1885-6
pubmed: 9180711

Auteurs

Yushi Suzuki (Y)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.

Yusuke Shimizu (Y)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.

Shogo Kasai (S)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.

Shun Yamazaki (S)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.

Masashi Takemaru (M)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.

Takuya Kitamura (T)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.

Saori Kawakami (S)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.

Takeshi Tamura (T)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.

Classifications MeSH