Indocyanine green fluorescence videoangiography for reliable variations of supraclavicular artery flaps.
Indocyanine green
Reconstructive surgical procedure
Surgical flaps
Journal
Archives of plastic surgery
ISSN: 2234-6163
Titre abrégé: Arch Plast Surg
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101577999
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
23
12
2018
accepted:
24
05
2019
entrez:
24
7
2019
pubmed:
25
7
2019
medline:
25
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pedicled flaps are useful for reconstructive surgery. Previously, we often used vascularized supraclavicular flaps, especially for head and neck reconstruction, but then shifted to using thoracic branch of the supraclavicular artery (TBSA) flaps. However, limited research exists on the anatomy of TBSA flaps and on the use of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence videoangiography for supraclavicular artery flaps. We utilized ICG fluorescence videoangiography to harvest reliable flaps in reconstructive operations, and describe the results herein. Data were retrospectively reviewed from six patients (five men and one woman: average age, 54 years; range, 48-60 years) for whom ICG videoangiography was performed to observe the skin perfusion of a supraclavicular flap after it was raised. Areas where the flap showed good enhancement were considered to be favorable for flap survival. The observation of ICG dye indicated good skin perfusion, which is predictive of flap survival; therefore, we trimmed any areas without dye filling and used the remaining viable part of the flap. The flaps ranged in size from 13×5.5 cm to 17×6.5 cm. One patient received a conventional supraclavicular flap, four patients received a TBSA flap, and one patient received a flap that was considered to be intermediate between a supraclavicular flap and a TBSA flap. The flaps completely survived in all cases, and no flap necrosis was observed. The TBSA flap is very useful in reconstructive surgery, and reliable flaps could be obtained by using ICG fluorescence videoangiography intraoperatively.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pedicled flaps are useful for reconstructive surgery. Previously, we often used vascularized supraclavicular flaps, especially for head and neck reconstruction, but then shifted to using thoracic branch of the supraclavicular artery (TBSA) flaps. However, limited research exists on the anatomy of TBSA flaps and on the use of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence videoangiography for supraclavicular artery flaps. We utilized ICG fluorescence videoangiography to harvest reliable flaps in reconstructive operations, and describe the results herein.
METHODS
METHODS
Data were retrospectively reviewed from six patients (five men and one woman: average age, 54 years; range, 48-60 years) for whom ICG videoangiography was performed to observe the skin perfusion of a supraclavicular flap after it was raised. Areas where the flap showed good enhancement were considered to be favorable for flap survival. The observation of ICG dye indicated good skin perfusion, which is predictive of flap survival; therefore, we trimmed any areas without dye filling and used the remaining viable part of the flap.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The flaps ranged in size from 13×5.5 cm to 17×6.5 cm. One patient received a conventional supraclavicular flap, four patients received a TBSA flap, and one patient received a flap that was considered to be intermediate between a supraclavicular flap and a TBSA flap. The flaps completely survived in all cases, and no flap necrosis was observed.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The TBSA flap is very useful in reconstructive surgery, and reliable flaps could be obtained by using ICG fluorescence videoangiography intraoperatively.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31336419
pii: aps.2018.01536
doi: 10.5999/aps.2018.01536
pmc: PMC6657196
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
318-323Références
Clin Anat. 2009 Mar;22(2):215-20
pubmed: 19089996
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Apr;125(4):1065-73
pubmed: 20335859
Burns. 2012 Sep;38(6):924-30
pubmed: 22360964
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 May;129(5):1043-8
pubmed: 22544087
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Apr;66(4):489-96
pubmed: 23273641
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Feb;67(2):198-204
pubmed: 24189308
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jan;154(1):66-72
pubmed: 26467355
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Sep;34(7):499-508
pubmed: 29775982
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Aug 04;4(2):148-152
pubmed: 30101227
Br J Plast Surg. 1979 Jul;32(3):207-12
pubmed: 380704
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Jun;99(7):1878-84; discussion 1885-6
pubmed: 9180711