Adaptable Model Parameters in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Lead to More Stable Predictions.
non-invasive prenatal testing
statistical models
z-score
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Jul 2019
11 Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
21
06
2019
revised:
08
07
2019
accepted:
09
07
2019
entrez:
25
7
2019
pubmed:
25
7
2019
medline:
24
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recent advances in massively parallel shotgun sequencing opened up new options for affordable non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetus aneuploidy from DNA material extracted from maternal plasma. Tests typically compare chromosomal distributions of a tested sample with a control set of healthy samples with unaffected fetuses. Deviations above certain threshold levels are concluded as positive findings. The main problem with this approach is that the variance of the control set is dependent on the number of sequenced fragments. The higher the amount, the more precise the estimation of actual chromosomal proportions is. Testing a sample with a highly different number of sequenced reads as used in training may thus lead to over- or under-estimation of their variance, and so lead to false predictions. We propose the calculation of a variance for each tested sample adaptively, based on the actual number of its sequenced fragments. We demonstrate how it leads to more stable predictions, mainly in real-world diagnostics with the highly divergent inter-sample coverage.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31336782
pii: ijms20143414
doi: 10.3390/ijms20143414
pmc: PMC6678500
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : European Regional Development Fund
ID : ITMS 26240220067
Références
Hum Reprod Update. 2005 Jan-Feb;11(1):59-67
pubmed: 15569699
Nat Genet. 2006 Aug;38(8):904-9
pubmed: 16862161
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;110(3):687-94
pubmed: 17766619
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 21;105(42):16266-71
pubmed: 18838674
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 23;105(51):20458-63
pubmed: 19073917
Genome Biol. 2009;10(3):R25
pubmed: 19261174
BMJ. 2011 Jan 11;342:c7401
pubmed: 21224326
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;204(3):205.e1-11
pubmed: 21310373
Clin Chem. 2011 Jul;57(7):1042-9
pubmed: 21519036
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Aug;25(8):1370-4
pubmed: 22070770
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;119(6):1270; author reply 1270-1
pubmed: 22617594
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Mar;42(5):e31
pubmed: 24170809
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7415-20
pubmed: 24799683
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 10;111(23):8583-8
pubmed: 24843150
Clin Chem. 2015 Apr;61(4):608-16
pubmed: 25710461
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Jan;36(1):56-62
pubmed: 26505614
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 15;10(12):e0144811
pubmed: 26669558
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Apr;36(4):304-11
pubmed: 26815144
Bioinformatics. 2019 Apr 15;35(8):1284-1291
pubmed: 30219853
J Biotechnol. 2019 Jun 20;299:72-78
pubmed: 31054297
Lancet. 1997 Aug 16;350(9076):485-7
pubmed: 9274585
Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Apr;62(4):768-75
pubmed: 9529358