Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial: does an SMS behaviour change programme with a classroom-based session improve the oral health of young people living in deprived areas? A study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.
Adolescent
Adolescent Behavior
Age Factors
Cell Phone
Child
Child Behavior
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Dental Caries
/ economics
Female
Health Behavior
Health Care Costs
Health Education, Dental
/ economics
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Male
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Oral Hygiene
Poverty Areas
Prevalence
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
School Dentistry
Text Messaging
/ economics
Time Factors
United Kingdom
/ epidemiology
Behaviour change
Caries prevention
Child dental health
Dental caries
Prevention
Randomised controlled trial
Short messaging service
mHealth
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Jul 2019
23 Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
07
03
2019
accepted:
26
06
2019
entrez:
25
7
2019
pubmed:
25
7
2019
medline:
6
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Almost one-half of 12-15 year olds living in deprived areas of the UK have dental caries (tooth decay) with few oral health promotion programmes aimed at children of this age. Mobile phone-based interventions such as short messaging service (SMS) interventions have been found effective at changing certain behaviours and improving health outcomes. This protocol describes the BRIGHT Trial, investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a behaviour change intervention-classroom-based session (CBS) embedded in the curriculum and a series of SMS delivered to participants twice daily to remind them to brush their teeth, compared to usual curriculum and no SMS-to reduce the prevalence of dental caries in young people from deprived areas. To investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to improve the oral health of young people living in deprived areas. This is a school-based, assessor-blinded, two-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot trial. Overall, the trial will involve approximately 5040 11-13 year olds in 42 schools with a 3-year follow-up. The trial will take place in secondary schools in England, Scotland and Wales. The primary outcome is the presence of carious lesions in permanent teeth at 3 years. Secondary outcomes are: number of carious teeth, frequency of twice-daily toothbrushing, plaque levels, gingivitis, child health-related quality of life and oral health-related quality of life. A cost-utility analysis will be conducted. The findings of the trial have implications for embedding oral health interventions into school curricula guidance produced by national bodies, including departments for education and dental public health and guideline-development organisations. ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN12139369 . Registered on 10 May 2017.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Almost one-half of 12-15 year olds living in deprived areas of the UK have dental caries (tooth decay) with few oral health promotion programmes aimed at children of this age. Mobile phone-based interventions such as short messaging service (SMS) interventions have been found effective at changing certain behaviours and improving health outcomes. This protocol describes the BRIGHT Trial, investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a behaviour change intervention-classroom-based session (CBS) embedded in the curriculum and a series of SMS delivered to participants twice daily to remind them to brush their teeth, compared to usual curriculum and no SMS-to reduce the prevalence of dental caries in young people from deprived areas.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to improve the oral health of young people living in deprived areas.
METHODS/DESIGN
METHODS
This is a school-based, assessor-blinded, two-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot trial. Overall, the trial will involve approximately 5040 11-13 year olds in 42 schools with a 3-year follow-up. The trial will take place in secondary schools in England, Scotland and Wales. The primary outcome is the presence of carious lesions in permanent teeth at 3 years. Secondary outcomes are: number of carious teeth, frequency of twice-daily toothbrushing, plaque levels, gingivitis, child health-related quality of life and oral health-related quality of life. A cost-utility analysis will be conducted.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The findings of the trial have implications for embedding oral health interventions into school curricula guidance produced by national bodies, including departments for education and dental public health and guideline-development organisations.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN12139369 . Registered on 10 May 2017.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31337437
doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3538-6
pii: 10.1186/s13063-019-3538-6
pmc: PMC6651965
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
452Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 15/166/08
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Health Technology Assessment Programme
ID : 15/166/08
Références
Br Dent J. 1999 Jul 10;187(1):38-41
pubmed: 10452189
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD002278
pubmed: 12535435
Acta Odontol Scand. 1963 Dec;21:533-51
pubmed: 14121956
J Am Dent Assoc. 1962 Jul;65:26-9
pubmed: 14489483
Acta Odontol Scand. 2003 Dec;61(6):347-55
pubmed: 14960006
Community Dent Health. 2004 Mar;21(1 Suppl):121-30
pubmed: 15072481
Community Dent Health. 2004 Sep;21(3):193-8
pubmed: 15470828
Caries Res. 2005 Jan-Feb;39(1):27-33
pubmed: 15591731
Br Dent J. 2006 May 13;200(9):487-91
pubmed: 16703081
J Public Health Dent. 2008 Spring;68(2):82-7
pubmed: 18221320
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Feb;36(2):165-73
pubmed: 19135907
Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32:56-69
pubmed: 20354039
Am J Public Health. 2011 Oct;101(10):1900-6
pubmed: 21330579
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Aug 1;30(8):713-27
pubmed: 22788261
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Aug 1;30(8):729-47
pubmed: 22788262
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;97:41-8
pubmed: 24161087
Sex Transm Dis. 2014 Jul;41(7):413-9
pubmed: 24922099
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 17;(6):CD002281
pubmed: 24934383
J Dent Res. 2015 Jan;94(1):10-8
pubmed: 25394849
J Public Health Dent. 2015 Spring;75(2):118-25
pubmed: 25409935
BMJ. 2015 Feb 26;350:h978
pubmed: 25722098
J Dent Res. 2015 May;94(5):650-8
pubmed: 25740856
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Apr 18;15:50
pubmed: 25912074
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Sep;25(5):327-38
pubmed: 26153526
J Dent Res. 2016 Jan;95(1):35-42
pubmed: 26438210
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Dec 21;3(4):e107
pubmed: 26690917
Trials. 2016 Feb 20;17(1):103
pubmed: 26897029
Am J Health Promot. 2018 May;32(4):865-879
pubmed: 27923885
Pediatr Dent. 2016 Oct;38(6):52-54
pubmed: 27931420
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Mar;52(3):391-402
pubmed: 28073656
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Oct 26;:null
pubmed: 30367538
Community Dent Health. 1994 Dec;11(4):233-9
pubmed: 7850643