Age estimation equations using vertebral osteophyte formation in a Thai population: comparison and modified osteophyte scoring method.

Age estimation Forensic anthropology Forensic science Thailand Vertebral osteophytes

Journal

Anatomy & cell biology
ISSN: 2093-3665
Titre abrégé: Anat Cell Biol
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101531987

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Historique:
received: 25 09 2018
revised: 12 03 2019
accepted: 12 03 2019
entrez: 25 7 2019
pubmed: 25 7 2019
medline: 25 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Age estimation from skeletal remains is an important step in forensic biological identification. The main objective of this study is to develop an age estimation equation for the Thai population from vertebral osteophytes. Each vertebra in the cervical, thoracic and lumbar segments was scored for degree of osteophyte formation. Classification was carried out in accordance with the criteria established by Snodgrass and Watanabe, and used a new modified score of the length of vertebral osteophyte for age estimation. The sample included 400 individuals (262 males, 138 females) ranging in age from 22 to 97 years. A sample of Thai vertebral columns was used, the columns being divided into the following groups of vertebrae: cervical (C2-C7), thoracic (T1-T12), and lumbar (L1-L5). Each vertebra was scored for the degree of osteophyte formation and the accumulated data was analyzed statistically. Correlation coefficients and R-squared from mean in lumbar vertebrae for females of criteria established by the method of Snodgrass and Watanabe, the new modified score by length of vertebral osteophytes were 0.801 and 0.642 (

Identifiants

pubmed: 31338232
doi: 10.5115/acb.2019.52.2.149
pmc: PMC6624338
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

149-160

Références

Neurosurgery. 2003 Jun;52(6):1449-53; discussion 1453-4
pubmed: 12762890
J Forensic Sci. 2004 May;49(3):458-63
pubmed: 15171159
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2006 May;8(3):156-60
pubmed: 16621650
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009 Feb;138(2):164-76
pubmed: 18711740
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Jan 13;10:4
pubmed: 19144120
Forensic Sci Int. 2009 Oct 30;191(1-3):114.e1-6
pubmed: 19679414
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Nov;111(5):1304-14
pubmed: 21799122
J Forensic Sci. 2012 Nov;57(6):1537-40
pubmed: 22486633
Sci Justice. 2012 Sep;52(3):177-80
pubmed: 22841141
Anat Cell Biol. 2012 Dec;45(4):274-81
pubmed: 23301195
Malawi Med J. 2012 Sep;24(3):69-71
pubmed: 23638278
Anat Cell Biol. 2014 Sep;47(3):157-61
pubmed: 25276474
J Forensic Sci. 1985 Jul;30(3):853-63
pubmed: 4031812
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1985 Sep;68(1):15-28
pubmed: 4061599
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1985 Sep;68(1):57-66
pubmed: 4061602
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1984 Oct;65(2):147-56
pubmed: 6507605
Forensic Sci Int. 1994 Feb;64(2-3):191-8
pubmed: 8175091

Auteurs

Sithee Praneatpolgrang (S)

Forensic Osteology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Sukon Prasitwattanaseree (S)

Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Excellence Center in Osteology Research and Training Center, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh (P)

Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Excellence Center in Osteology Research and Training Center, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Classifications MeSH