CD68/CD31 immunohistochemistry double stain demonstrates increased accuracy in diagnosing pathologic antibody-mediated rejection in cardiac transplant patients.


Journal

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
ISSN: 1600-6143
Titre abrégé: Am J Transplant
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100968638

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2019
Historique:
received: 11 03 2019
revised: 27 06 2019
accepted: 13 07 2019
pubmed: 25 7 2019
medline: 12 9 2020
entrez: 25 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pathologic antibody-mediated rejection (pAMR) occurs in 10% of cardiac transplant patients and is associated with increased mortality. The endomyocardial biopsy remains the primary diagnostic tool to detect and define pAMR. However, certain challenges arise for the pathologist. Accurate identification of >10% of intravascular macrophages along with endothelial swelling, which remains a critical component of diagnosing pAMR, is one such challenge. We used double labeling with an endothelial and histiocytic marker to improve diagnostic accuracy. Twenty-two cardiac transplant endomyocardial biopsies were screened using a CD68/CD31 immunohistochemical (IHC) double stain. To determine whether pAMR diagnosis would change using the double stain, intravascular macrophage staining was compared to using CD68 alone. Twenty-two cardiac pAMR cases from patients were included. Fifty-nine percent of cases previously called >10% intravascular macrophage positive by CD68 alone were called <10% positive using the CD68/CD31 double stain. Not using the double stain was associated with a significant overcall. In C4d-negative cases, using the CD68/CD31 double stain downgraded the diagnosis of pAMR2 to pAMR1 in 32% of cases. It was concluded that more than one third of patients were overdiagnosed with pAMR using CD68 by IHC alone. We demonstrate the value of using a CD68/CD31 double stain to increase accuracy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31339651
doi: 10.1111/ajt.15540
pii: S1600-6135(22)09306-6
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antigens, CD 0
Antigens, Differentiation, T-Lymphocyte 0
Biomarkers 0
CD69 antigen 0
Isoantibodies 0
Lectins, C-Type 0
Pecam1 protein, mouse 0
Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3149-3154

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Références

Organ Procurement and Transplantation. 2018; https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/. Accessed March 31, 2019.
Hammond MEH, Revelo MP, Miller DV, et al. ISHLT pathology antibody mediated rejection score correlates with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality: a retrospective validation analysis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35(3):320-325.
Coutance G, Ouldamar S, Rouvier P, et al. Late antibody-mediated rejection after heart transplantation: mortality, graft function, and fulminant cardiac allograft vasculopathy. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(8):1050-1057.
Loupy A, Toquet C, Rouvier P, et al. Late failing heart allografts: pathology of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and association with antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant. 2016;16:111-120.
Kidambi S, Mohamedali B, Bhat G. Clinical outcomes in sensitized heart transplant patients bridged with ventricular assist devices. Clin Transplant. 2015;29(6):499-505.
Rodriguez ER, Skojec DV, Tan CD, et al. Antibody-mediated rejection in human cardiac allografts: evaluation of immunoglobulins and complement activation products C4d and C3d as markers. Am J Transplant. 2005;5(11):2778-2785.
Loupy A, Cazes A, Guillemain R, et al. Very late heart transplant rejection is associated with microvascular injury, complement deposition and progression to cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:1478-1487.
Berry GJ, Angelini A, Burke MM, et al. The ISHLT working formulation for pathologic diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplantation: evolution and current status (2005-2011). J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30:601-611.
Colvin MM, Cook JL, Chang P, et al. Antibody-mediated rejection in cardiac transplantation: emerging knowledge in diagnosis and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;131(18):1608-1639.
Berry GJ, Burke MM, Andersen C, et al. The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Working Formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the pathologic diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32:1147-1162.
Bruneval P, Angelini A, Miller D, et al. The XIIIth Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology: the banff 2015 heart meeting report: improving antibody-mediated rejection diagnostics: strengths, unmet needs, and future directions. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(1):42-53.
Youn JC, Shim HS, Lee JS, et al. Detailed pathologic evaluation on endomyocardial biopsy provides long-term prognostic information in patients with acute myocarditis. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2014;23(3):139-144.
Kucirka LM, Maleszewski JJ, Segev DL, Halushka MK. Survey of North American pathologist practices regarding antibody-mediated rejection in cardiac transplant biopsies. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2011;20(3):132-138.
Chih S, Tinckam KJ, Ross HJ. A survey of current practice for antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:1069-1074.
Lion J, Taflin C, Cross AR, et al. HLA class II antibody activation of endothelial cells promotes Th17 and disrupts regulatory T lymphocyte expansion. Am J Transplant. 2016;16(5):1408-1420.
Kottke-Marchant K, Newman WE, Ratliff NB. Cardiac transplant-associated vascular disease: evolution, immunophenotype, and evidence of endothelial activation. Cardiovasc Pathol. 1992;1(3):177-188.
Tible M, Loupy A, Vernerey D, et al. Pathologic classification of antibody-mediated rejection correlates with donor-specific antibodies and endothelial cell activation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32:769-776.
Loupy A, Duong Van Huyen JP, Hidalgo L, et al. Gene expression profiling for the identification and classification of antibody-mediated heart rejection. Circulation. 2017;135(10):917-935.
Fedrigo M, Leone O, Burke MM, et al. Inflammatory cell burden and phenotype in endomyocardial biopsies with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR): a multicenter pilot study from the AECVP. Am J Transplant. 2015;15:526-534.
Fedrigo M, Feltrin G, Poli F, et al. Intravascular macrophages in cardiac allograft biopsies for diagnosis of early and late antibody-mediated rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32:404-409.

Auteurs

Carolyn Glass (C)

Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Yasmeen M Butt (YM)

Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Sefik Tunc Gokaslan (ST)

Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Jose R Torrealba (JR)

Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH