Minimally Invasive Approach for Diagnosing TMJ Osteoarthritis.
artificial intelligence
bioinformatics
biomarkers
digital imaging/radiology
joint disease
temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)
Journal
Journal of dental research
ISSN: 1544-0591
Titre abrégé: J Dent Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0354343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
25
7
2019
medline:
18
7
2020
entrez:
25
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study's objectives were to test correlations among groups of biomarkers that are associated with condylar morphology and to apply artificial intelligence to test shape analysis features in a neural network (NN) to stage condylar morphology in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJOA). Seventeen TMJOA patients (39.9 ± 11.7 y) experiencing signs and symptoms of the disease for less than 10 y and 17 age- and sex-matched control subjects (39.4 ± 15.2 y) completed a questionnaire, had a temporomandibular joint clinical exam, had blood and saliva samples drawn, and had high-resolution cone beam computed tomography scans taken. Serum and salivary levels of 17 inflammatory biomarkers were quantified using protein microarrays. A NN was trained with 259 other condyles to detect and classify the stage of TMJOA and then compared to repeated clinical experts' classifications. Levels of the salivary biomarkers MMP-3, VE-cadherin, 6Ckine, and PAI-1 were correlated to each other in TMJOA patients and were significantly correlated with condylar morphological variability on the posterior surface of the condyle. In serum, VE-cadherin and VEGF were correlated with one another and with significant morphological variability on the anterior surface of the condyle, while MMP-3 and CXCL16 presented statistically significant associations with variability on the anterior surface, lateral pole, and superior-posterior surface of the condyle. The range of mouth opening variables were the clinical markers with the most significant associations with morphological variability at the medial and lateral condylar poles. The repeated clinician consensus classification had 97.8% agreement on degree of degeneration within 1 group difference. Predictive analytics of the NN's staging of TMJOA compared to the repeated clinicians' consensus revealed 73.5% and 91.2% accuracy. This study demonstrated significant correlations among variations in protein expression levels, clinical symptoms, and condylar surface morphology. The results suggest that 3-dimensional variability in TMJOA condylar morphology can be comprehensively phenotyped by the NN.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31340134
doi: 10.1177/0022034519865187
pmc: PMC6704428
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1103-1111Subventions
Organisme : NIDCR NIH HHS
ID : R01 DE024450
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB021391
Pays : United States
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;(4):CD007261
pubmed: 22513948
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1750:363-370
pubmed: 29512086
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2015 Jul;2(3):034501
pubmed: 26158119
Arch Oral Biol. 2004 Jun;49(6):493-9
pubmed: 15099807
Proteomics Clin Appl. 2009 Jan 1;3(1):116-134
pubmed: 19898684
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 May;73(5):834-42
pubmed: 25795184
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 May;91(5):517-25
pubmed: 11346728
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;42(7):1402-7
pubmed: 24864071
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Jan;21(1):16-21
pubmed: 23194896
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017 Dec;124(6):588-599
pubmed: 29055644
J Fam Pract. 1992 May;34(5):582-4
pubmed: 1578208
Cranio. 2018 Jul;36(4):264-267
pubmed: 28618979
Imaging Sci Dent. 2012 Dec;42(4):249-53
pubmed: 23301212
Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1323-41
pubmed: 22770690
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2017 Feb 11;10137:
pubmed: 28690356
Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007 Jun;3(6):346-56
pubmed: 17538566
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44
pubmed: 26017442
Insight J. 2006;(1071):242-250
pubmed: 21941375
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Sep 30;14(10):19805-30
pubmed: 24084727
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 Jan;55(1):20-7; discussion 27-8
pubmed: 8994464
Am Fam Physician. 2015 Mar 15;91(6):378-86
pubmed: 25822556
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2019 Apr;25(2):114-125
pubmed: 30638141
Neuroimage. 2017 Oct 1;159:107-121
pubmed: 28735012
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Jan;17(1):43-8
pubmed: 18571442
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Oct;22(10):1657-67
pubmed: 25278075
J Dent Educ. 2008 Aug;72(8):930-47
pubmed: 18676802
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(1):20130273
pubmed: 24170802
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2011 Jul;35(5):345-52
pubmed: 21185694
Ann Stat. 2012 Oct 1;40(5):2634-2666
pubmed: 23645942
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28
pubmed: 16545965
Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2007 Apr;29(2):103-11
pubmed: 17484274
J Dent Res. 2008 Apr;87(4):296-307
pubmed: 18362309
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Jul;102(1):22-7
pubmed: 16831668
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27
pubmed: 24482784
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2018 Jul;67:45-54
pubmed: 29753964