Prevalence and clinical significance of discordant LI-RADS
Adult
Aged
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
/ complications
Contrast Media
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Image Enhancement
/ methods
Liver
/ diagnostic imaging
Liver Cirrhosis
/ complications
Liver Neoplasms
/ complications
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Prevalence
Radiology Information Systems
/ statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Concordance
Discordance
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Liver imaging and reporting and data system (LI-RADS)
Journal
Abdominal radiology (New York)
ISSN: 2366-0058
Titre abrégé: Abdom Radiol (NY)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101674571
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
26
7
2019
medline:
20
1
2021
entrez:
26
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine the prevalence and clinical significance of discordant LI-RADS This cross-sectional study included 93 cirrhosis patients who underwent 1.5 or 3 T MCE MRI for evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Two abdominal radiologists independently reviewed T1-, T2-, diffusion-weighted unenhanced images as well as MCE T1-weighted fat-suppressed images and reported liver observations using LI-RADS Reportable and actionable observations were overall concordant between two radiologists only in 32.3% [24.6, 41.0] and 40.1% [29.5, 51.5] of cases, respectively. Poor overall concordance was related to detection concordance of 52.0% [44.3, 59.5] and 62.5% [52.3, 71.8], as well as LR-category concordance of 73.7% [61.6, 83.1] and 70.9% [57.3, 81.6], for reportable and actionable observations, respectively. Discordant LI-RADS Discordant MRI LI-RADS
Identifiants
pubmed: 31342103
doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02133-w
pii: 10.1007/s00261-019-02133-w
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM