Misdiagnosis of ARVC leading to inappropriate ICD implant and subsequent ICD removal - lessons learned.
Adult
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia
/ diagnosis
Defibrillators, Implantable
Device Removal
Diagnostic Errors
Electric Countershock
/ instrumentation
Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac
Female
Heart Conduction System
/ physiopathology
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardium
/ pathology
Predictive Value of Tests
Registries
Unnecessary Procedures
/ instrumentation
Young Adult
arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
electrophysiology study
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
misdiagnosis
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
ISSN: 1540-8167
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010756
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
received:
28
05
2019
revised:
28
06
2019
accepted:
09
07
2019
pubmed:
26
7
2019
medline:
22
9
2020
entrez:
26
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited progressive cardiomyopathy characterized by frequent life-threatening arrhythmias. The diagnosis of ARVC is challenging and is on the basis of a set of major and minor criteria as described by the modified Task Force Criteria (TFC). We report our clinical experience in a series of patients who were misdiagnosed with ARVC and subsequently underwent removal of their implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) after a re-evaluation at our center. We studied 12 patients who were misdiagnosed with ARVC and had ICD implantation before our assessment. All patients had a repeat evaluation and were scored according to TFC before ICD removal. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) studies performed at outside institutions during the initial evaluation were reported abnormal and classified as meeting major TFC in ninety percent of patients. The most common abnormality reported was fatty infiltration of the right ventricular (RV) free wall and/or presence of focal intra-myocardial fat in six patients (50%). On re-evaluation, none of these findings fulfilled the TFC for the diagnosis. This study demonstrated that high dependence on misinterpretation of CMR along with a misunderstanding of the TFC evaluation are the main reasons for the misdiagnosis of ARVC. Despite the updated criteria for almost a decade, this study reminds that the diagnosis of ARVC is complex and hence careful TFC evaluation and consideration of multiple cardiac test results should be the focused approach for clinicians when confronted with suspected ARVC patients.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2020-2026Subventions
Organisme : Healing Hearts Foundation
Pays : International
Organisme : Fondation Leducq
Pays : International
Organisme : Francis P. Chiaramonte Private foundation
Pays : International
Organisme : Dr. Satish, Rupal and Robin Shah ARVD fund at Johns Hopkins
Pays : International
Organisme : Peter French Memorial Foundation
Pays : International
Organisme : Wilmerding Endowments
Pays : International
Organisme : the Bogle Foundation
Pays : International
Organisme : Patrick J. Harrison Family
Pays : International
Organisme : Campanella Family
Pays : International
Organisme : Leyla Erkan family Fund for ARVD Research
Pays : International
Organisme : Leonie-Wild Foundation
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.