Vocal imitation of percussion sounds: On the perceptual similarity between imitations and imitated sounds.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
17
11
2017
accepted:
06
07
2019
entrez:
26
7
2019
pubmed:
26
7
2019
medline:
3
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of the voice for communicating sonic ideas, and the accuracy with which it can be used to imitate acoustic instruments, synthesised sounds and environmental sounds. However, there has been little research on vocal imitation of percussion sounds, particularly concerning the perceptual similarity between imitations and the sounds being imitated. In the present study we address this by investigating how accurately musicians can vocally imitate percussion sounds, in terms of whether listeners consider the imitations 'more similar' to the imitated sounds than to other same-category sounds. In a vocal production task, 14 musicians imitated 30 drum sounds from five categories (cymbals, hats, kicks, snares, toms). Listeners were then asked to rate the similarity between the imitations and same-category drum sounds via web based listening test. We found that imitated sounds received the highest similarity ratings for 16 of the 30 sounds. The similarity between a given drum sound and its imitation was generally rated higher than for imitations of another same-category sound, however for some drum categories (snares and toms) certain sounds were consistently considered most similar to the imitations, irrespective of the sound being imitated. Finally, we apply an existing auditory image based measure for perceptual similarity between same-category drum sounds, to model the similarity ratings using linear mixed effect regression. The results indicate that this measure is a good predictor of perceptual similarity between imitations and imitated sounds, when compared to acoustic features containing only temporal or spectral features.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31344080
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219955
pii: PONE-D-17-40726
pmc: PMC6657857
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0219955Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Oct;100(4 Pt 1):2425-38
pubmed: 8865648
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Feb;135(2):862-73
pubmed: 25234894
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Mar 14;285(1874):
pubmed: 29514962
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 16;11(12):e0168167
pubmed: 27992480
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Feb;141(2):783
pubmed: 28253682
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 8;8(1):2634
pubmed: 29422530
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 25;14(7):e0219955
pubmed: 31344080
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Feb;133(2):1043-54
pubmed: 23363120
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010 Mar;16(1):16-32
pubmed: 20350041
J Acoust Soc Am. 1977 May;61(5):1270-7
pubmed: 560400
Psychol Res. 1995;58(3):177-92
pubmed: 8570786
Percept Psychophys. 2007 Aug;69(6):839-55
pubmed: 18018965
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Mar 15;292(6522):746-50
pubmed: 3082422
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 15;31(4):1762-70
pubmed: 16616863
Hear Res. 1979 Mar;1(2):155-82
pubmed: 521399
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Jan;139(1):290-300
pubmed: 26827025