Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-006): post-hoc 5-year results from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study.


Journal

The Lancet. Oncology
ISSN: 1474-5488
Titre abrégé: Lancet Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100957246

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2019
Historique:
received: 08 02 2019
revised: 17 05 2019
accepted: 20 05 2019
pubmed: 28 7 2019
medline: 1 7 2020
entrez: 27 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pembrolizumab improved progression-free survival and overall survival versus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma and is now a standard of care in the first-line setting. However, the optimal duration of anti-PD-1 administration is unknown. We present results from 5 years of follow-up of patients in KEYNOTE-006. KEYNOTE-006 was an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study done at 87 academic institutions, hospitals, and cancer centres in 16 countries. Patients aged at least 18 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, ipilimumab-naive histologically confirmed advanced melanoma with known BRAF Between Sept 18, 2013, and March 3, 2014, 834 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab (every 2 weeks, n=279; every 3 weeks, n=277), or ipilimumab (n=278). After a median follow-up of 57·7 months (IQR 56·7-59·2) in surviving patients, median overall survival was 32·7 months (95% CI 24·5-41·6) in the combined pembrolizumab groups and 15·9 months (13·3-22·0) in the ipilimumab group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·73, 95% CI 0·61-0·88, p=0·00049). Median progression-free survival was 8·4 months (95% CI 6·6-11·3) in the combined pembrolizumab groups versus 3·4 months (2·9-4·2) in the ipilimumab group (HR 0·57, 95% CI 0·48-0·67, p<0·0001). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 96 (17%) of 555 patients in the combined pembrolizumab groups and in 50 (20%) of 256 patients in the ipilimumab group; the most common of these events were colitis (11 [2%] vs 16 [6%]), diarrhoea (ten [2%] vs seven [3%]), and fatigue (four [<1%] vs three [1%]). Any-grade serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 75 (14%) patients in the combined pembrolizumab groups and in 45 (18%) patients in the ipilimumab group. One patient assigned to pembrolizumab died from treatment-related sepsis. Pembrolizumab continued to show superiority over ipilimumab after almost 5 years of follow-up. These results provide further support for use of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma. Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Pembrolizumab improved progression-free survival and overall survival versus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma and is now a standard of care in the first-line setting. However, the optimal duration of anti-PD-1 administration is unknown. We present results from 5 years of follow-up of patients in KEYNOTE-006.
METHODS
KEYNOTE-006 was an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study done at 87 academic institutions, hospitals, and cancer centres in 16 countries. Patients aged at least 18 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, ipilimumab-naive histologically confirmed advanced melanoma with known BRAF
FINDINGS
Between Sept 18, 2013, and March 3, 2014, 834 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab (every 2 weeks, n=279; every 3 weeks, n=277), or ipilimumab (n=278). After a median follow-up of 57·7 months (IQR 56·7-59·2) in surviving patients, median overall survival was 32·7 months (95% CI 24·5-41·6) in the combined pembrolizumab groups and 15·9 months (13·3-22·0) in the ipilimumab group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·73, 95% CI 0·61-0·88, p=0·00049). Median progression-free survival was 8·4 months (95% CI 6·6-11·3) in the combined pembrolizumab groups versus 3·4 months (2·9-4·2) in the ipilimumab group (HR 0·57, 95% CI 0·48-0·67, p<0·0001). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 96 (17%) of 555 patients in the combined pembrolizumab groups and in 50 (20%) of 256 patients in the ipilimumab group; the most common of these events were colitis (11 [2%] vs 16 [6%]), diarrhoea (ten [2%] vs seven [3%]), and fatigue (four [<1%] vs three [1%]). Any-grade serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 75 (14%) patients in the combined pembrolizumab groups and in 45 (18%) patients in the ipilimumab group. One patient assigned to pembrolizumab died from treatment-related sepsis.
INTERPRETATION
Pembrolizumab continued to show superiority over ipilimumab after almost 5 years of follow-up. These results provide further support for use of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma.
FUNDING
Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31345627
pii: S1470-2045(19)30388-2
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30388-2
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Ipilimumab 0
pembrolizumab DPT0O3T46P

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01866319']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1239-1251

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Caroline Robert (C)

Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: caroline.robert@gustaveroussy.fr.

Antoni Ribas (A)

David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Jacob Schachter (J)

Sheba Medical Center at Tel HaShomer, Tel HaShomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Ana Arance (A)

Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Jean-Jacques Grob (JJ)

Aix Marseille Université, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France.

Laurent Mortier (L)

Université Lille, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France.

Adil Daud (A)

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Matteo S Carlino (MS)

Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Melanoma Institute Australia, and The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Catriona M McNeil (CM)

Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, and Melanoma Institute Australia, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Michal Lotem (M)

Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah Hebrew Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

James M G Larkin (JMG)

Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.

Paul Lorigan (P)

University of Manchester and the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Bart Neyns (B)

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Christian U Blank (CU)

Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Teresa M Petrella (TM)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Omid Hamid (O)

The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Shu-Chih Su (SC)

Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Clemens Krepler (C)

Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Nageatte Ibrahim (N)

Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Georgina V Long (GV)

Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Mater Hospital, and Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH