Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Heterogeneity and DNA Repair Defects in Prostate Cancer.

BRCA2 Castration-resistant prostate cancer Defective DNA repair Prostate cancer Prostate-specific membrane antigen Theranostics Treatment resistance Tumour heterogeneity

Journal

European urology
ISSN: 1873-7560
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 7512719

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2019
Historique:
received: 26 02 2019
accepted: 25 06 2019
pubmed: 28 7 2019
medline: 5 1 2021
entrez: 27 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA; folate hydrolase) prostate cancer (PC) expression has theranostic utility. To elucidate PC PSMA expression and associate this with defective DNA damage repair (DDR). Membranous PSMA (mPSMA) expression was scored immunohistochemically from metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC) and matching, same-patient, diagnostic biopsies, and correlated with next-generation sequencing (NGS) and clinical outcome data. Expression of mPSMA was quantitated by modified H-score. Patient DNA was tested by NGS. Gene expression and activity scores were determined from mCRPC transcriptomes. Statistical correlations utilised Wilcoxon signed rank tests, survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier test, and sample heterogeneity was quantified by Shannon's diversity index. Expression of mPSMA at diagnosis was associated with higher Gleason grade (p=0.04) and worse overall survival (p=0.006). Overall, mPSMA expression levels increased at mCRPC (median H-score [interquartile range]: castration-sensitive prostate cancer [CSPC] 17.5 [0.0-60.0] vs mCRPC 55.0 [2.8-117.5]). Surprisingly, 42% (n=16) of CSPC and 27% (n=16) of mCRPC tissues sampled had no detectable mPSMA (H-score <10). Marked intratumour heterogeneity of mPSMA expression, with foci containing no detectable PSMA, was observed in all mPSMA expressing CSPC (100%) and 37 (84%) mCRPC biopsies. Heterogeneous intrapatient mPSMA expression between metastases was also observed, with the lowest expression in liver metastases. Tumours with DDR had higher mPSMA expression (p=0.016; 87.5 [25.0-247.5] vs 20 [0.3-98.8]; difference in medians 60 [5.0-95.0]); validation cohort studies confirmed higher mPSMA expression in patients with deleterious aberrations in BRCA2 (p<0.001; median H-score: 300 [165-300]; difference in medians 195.0 [100.0-270.0]) and ATM (p=0.005; 212.5 [136.3-300]; difference in medians 140.0 [55.0-200]) than in molecularly unselected mCRPC biopsies (55.0 [2.75-117.5]). Validation studies using mCRPC transcriptomes corroborated these findings, also indicating that SOX2 high tumours have low PSMA expression. Membranous PSMA expression is upregulated in some but not all PCs, with mPSMA expression demonstrating marked inter- and intrapatient heterogeneity. DDR aberrations are associated with higher mPSMA expression and merit further evaluation as predictive biomarkers of response for PSMA-targeted therapies in larger, prospective cohorts. Through analysis of prostate cancer samples, we report that the presence of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is extremely variable both within one patient and between different patients. This may limit the usefulness of PSMA scans and PSMA-targeted therapies. We show for the first time that prostate cancers with defective DNA repair produce more PSMA and so may respond better to PSMA-targeting treatments.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA; folate hydrolase) prostate cancer (PC) expression has theranostic utility.
OBJECTIVE
To elucidate PC PSMA expression and associate this with defective DNA damage repair (DDR).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
Membranous PSMA (mPSMA) expression was scored immunohistochemically from metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC) and matching, same-patient, diagnostic biopsies, and correlated with next-generation sequencing (NGS) and clinical outcome data.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Expression of mPSMA was quantitated by modified H-score. Patient DNA was tested by NGS. Gene expression and activity scores were determined from mCRPC transcriptomes. Statistical correlations utilised Wilcoxon signed rank tests, survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier test, and sample heterogeneity was quantified by Shannon's diversity index.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
Expression of mPSMA at diagnosis was associated with higher Gleason grade (p=0.04) and worse overall survival (p=0.006). Overall, mPSMA expression levels increased at mCRPC (median H-score [interquartile range]: castration-sensitive prostate cancer [CSPC] 17.5 [0.0-60.0] vs mCRPC 55.0 [2.8-117.5]). Surprisingly, 42% (n=16) of CSPC and 27% (n=16) of mCRPC tissues sampled had no detectable mPSMA (H-score <10). Marked intratumour heterogeneity of mPSMA expression, with foci containing no detectable PSMA, was observed in all mPSMA expressing CSPC (100%) and 37 (84%) mCRPC biopsies. Heterogeneous intrapatient mPSMA expression between metastases was also observed, with the lowest expression in liver metastases. Tumours with DDR had higher mPSMA expression (p=0.016; 87.5 [25.0-247.5] vs 20 [0.3-98.8]; difference in medians 60 [5.0-95.0]); validation cohort studies confirmed higher mPSMA expression in patients with deleterious aberrations in BRCA2 (p<0.001; median H-score: 300 [165-300]; difference in medians 195.0 [100.0-270.0]) and ATM (p=0.005; 212.5 [136.3-300]; difference in medians 140.0 [55.0-200]) than in molecularly unselected mCRPC biopsies (55.0 [2.75-117.5]). Validation studies using mCRPC transcriptomes corroborated these findings, also indicating that SOX2 high tumours have low PSMA expression.
CONCLUSIONS
Membranous PSMA expression is upregulated in some but not all PCs, with mPSMA expression demonstrating marked inter- and intrapatient heterogeneity. DDR aberrations are associated with higher mPSMA expression and merit further evaluation as predictive biomarkers of response for PSMA-targeted therapies in larger, prospective cohorts.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Through analysis of prostate cancer samples, we report that the presence of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is extremely variable both within one patient and between different patients. This may limit the usefulness of PSMA scans and PSMA-targeted therapies. We show for the first time that prostate cancers with defective DNA repair produce more PSMA and so may respond better to PSMA-targeting treatments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31345636
pii: S0302-2838(19)30520-2
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.030
pmc: PMC6853166
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antigens, Surface 0
FOLH1 protein, human EC 3.4.17.21
Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II EC 3.4.17.21

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

469-478

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M018318/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Références

Cell. 2015 May 21;161(5):1215-1228
pubmed: 26000489
Prostate. 2018 May;78(7):491-497
pubmed: 29436722
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Dec;3:1-5
pubmed: 35100671
Nat Rev Cancer. 2017 Oct;17(10):605-619
pubmed: 28912577
Hum Pathol. 2007 May;38(5):696-701
pubmed: 17320151
Prostate. 2010 Feb 15;70(3):305-16
pubmed: 19830782
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 20;30(36):e386-9
pubmed: 23169519
Science. 2017 Jan 6;355(6320):84-88
pubmed: 28059768
Cell Rep. 2018 Apr 03;23(1):239-254.e6
pubmed: 29617664
J Nucl Med. 2016 Sep;57(9):1334-8
pubmed: 27056618
J Nucl Med. 2017 Jan;58(1):85-90
pubmed: 27765862
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 29;373(18):1697-708
pubmed: 26510020
Prostate. 2011 Feb 15;71(3):281-8
pubmed: 20809553
Nature. 2013 Sep 19;501(7467):338-45
pubmed: 24048066
Sci Signal. 2017 Mar 14;10(470):
pubmed: 28292957
J Urol. 1998 Dec;160(6 Pt 2):2396-401
pubmed: 9817391
Neuro Oncol. 2014 Oct;16(10):1313-23
pubmed: 24811392
Nat Protoc. 2012 Mar 01;7(3):562-78
pubmed: 22383036
Clin Cancer Res. 1996 Aug;2(8):1289-97
pubmed: 9816299
J Exp Med. 2018 Jan 2;215(1):159-175
pubmed: 29141866
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Oct 15;23(20):6070-6077
pubmed: 28751446
J Clin Pathol. 1995 Sep;48(9):876-8
pubmed: 7490328
J Nucl Med. 2017 Sep;58(Suppl 2):67S-76S
pubmed: 28864615
Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 1999 Apr;14(2):99-111
pubmed: 10850293
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Aug;44(9):1448-1454
pubmed: 28488028
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):926-937
pubmed: 27363387
Cancer. 1998 Jun 1;82(11):2256-61
pubmed: 9610707
Pathol Oncol Res. 2009 Jun;15(2):167-72
pubmed: 18802790
Cancer Discov. 2017 Sep;7(9):1006-1017
pubmed: 28450425
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Jan;41(1):11-20
pubmed: 24072344
BJU Int. 2007 Apr;99(4):807-11
pubmed: 17155968
Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Dec 15;9(17):6357-62
pubmed: 14695135
Clin Cancer Res. 1997 Jan;3(1):81-5
pubmed: 9815541

Auteurs

Alec Paschalis (A)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.

Beshara Sheehan (B)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

Ruth Riisnaes (R)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

Daniel Nava Rodrigues (DN)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

Bora Gurel (B)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

Claudia Bertan (C)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

Ana Ferreira (A)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

Maryou B K Lambros (MBK)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

George Seed (G)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

Wei Yuan (W)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

David Dolling (D)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

Jon C Welti (JC)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

Antje Neeb (A)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

Semini Sumanasuriya (S)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.

Pasquale Rescigno (P)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, AOU Federico II, Naples, Italy; Department of Translational Medical Sciences, AOU Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Diletta Bianchini (D)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.

Nina Tunariu (N)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.

Suzanne Carreira (S)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

Adam Sharp (A)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.

Wim Oyen (W)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

Johann S de Bono (JS)

The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK. Electronic address: johann.de-Bono@icr.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH