Comparative evaluation of sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self etching pit and fissure sealant- stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscopic analyses.


Journal

Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry
ISSN: 1989-5488
Titre abrégé: J Clin Exp Dent
Pays: Spain
ID NLM: 101603132

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Historique:
received: 06 02 2019
accepted: 23 05 2019
entrez: 27 7 2019
pubmed: 28 7 2019
medline: 28 7 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The efficacy of pit and fissure sealants in preventing occlusal caries is a well-established fact. Considering the difficulty in achieving strict isolation for a longer duration while treating the pediatric patients, a simplified procedure of sealant application is desirable. While, a self-etching sealant, Prevent Seal offers a quick procedure, the physical properties of this material haven't been studied yet. Thus, this study was aimed to comparatively evaluate sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self-etching pit and fissure sealant and a conventional resin sealant. This was an The comparison of tested properties between the groups was done using Chi square test. There was no statistically significant difference observed when microleakage and sealant penetration / adaptation properties were compared between two groups ( The self-etching sealant Prevent seal was found to have similar microleakage, sealant penetration and adaptation properties as conventional acid etch sealant.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The efficacy of pit and fissure sealants in preventing occlusal caries is a well-established fact. Considering the difficulty in achieving strict isolation for a longer duration while treating the pediatric patients, a simplified procedure of sealant application is desirable. While, a self-etching sealant, Prevent Seal offers a quick procedure, the physical properties of this material haven't been studied yet. Thus, this study was aimed to comparatively evaluate sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self-etching pit and fissure sealant and a conventional resin sealant.
MATERIAL AND METHODS METHODS
This was an
RESULTS RESULTS
The comparison of tested properties between the groups was done using Chi square test. There was no statistically significant difference observed when microleakage and sealant penetration / adaptation properties were compared between two groups (
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The self-etching sealant Prevent seal was found to have similar microleakage, sealant penetration and adaptation properties as conventional acid etch sealant.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31346375
doi: 10.4317/jced.55624
pii: 55624
pmc: PMC6645258
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e547-e552

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest statement:The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exist.

Références

J Oral Rehabil. 1999 May;26(5):436-41
pubmed: 10373092
Caries Res. 1975;9(5):373-87
pubmed: 1055640
Am J Dent. 2000 Nov;13(Spec No):85D-87D
pubmed: 11763923
Am J Dent. 2000 Aug;13(4):187-91
pubmed: 11763928
J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 Jan-Apr;70(1):24-8
pubmed: 12762604
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2003 Sep;4(3):114-20
pubmed: 14529330
Am J Dent. 2003 Aug;16(4):249-51
pubmed: 14579879
Pediatr Dent. 2004 May-Jun;26(3):240-4
pubmed: 15185805
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2004 Sep;5(3):179-84
pubmed: 15471528
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2005 Dec;6(4):179-84
pubmed: 16426116
J Dent Child (Chic). 2005 Sep-Dec;72(3):95-9
pubmed: 16568912
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2007 Mar;8(1):25-30
pubmed: 17359211
Angle Orthod. 2008 Jul;78(4):716-21
pubmed: 18302473
Pediatr Dent. 2008 Jan-Feb;30(1):25-8
pubmed: 18402095
Pediatr Dent. 2008 Jan-Feb;30(1):29-33
pubmed: 18402096
Pediatr Dent. 1991 Nov-Dec;13(6):370-2
pubmed: 1843995
Pediatr Dent. 2009 Jul-Aug;31(4):334-9
pubmed: 19722444
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 May;137(5):679-83
pubmed: 20451788
Scand J Dent Res. 1990 Feb;98(1):66-9
pubmed: 2183346
Pediatr Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;33(7):479-83
pubmed: 22353406
Pediatr Dent. 2013 Jul-Aug;35(4):351-4
pubmed: 23930635
Pediatr Dent. 2016;38(4):282-308
pubmed: 27557916
Eur J Dent. 2018 Apr-Jun;12(2):242-246
pubmed: 29988227
Quintessence Int. 1993 Feb;24(2):131-3
pubmed: 8511264

Auteurs

Dhruv Garg (D)

Former student. Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal.

Karuna Mahabala (K)

Assistant Professor. Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal.

Amita Lewis (A)

Reader. Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal.

Srikant Natarajan (S)

Professor and Head. Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal.

Anupama Nayak (A)

Assistant Professor. Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal.

Ashwin Rao (A)

Associate Professor. Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal.

Classifications MeSH