Morphologic Factors Predict Pain Relief Following Pancreatic Head Resection in Chronic Pancreatitis Description of the Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Relief (CPPR) Score.
Journal
Annals of surgery
ISSN: 1528-1140
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372354
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2021
01 04 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
28
7
2019
medline:
7
4
2021
entrez:
27
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study analyzes the clinicopathologic findings and their impact on outcome of patients so as to identify which patients benefit most from surgical treatment in chronic pancreatitis, especially in regard to pain relief. The predominant symptom of chronic pancreatitis is chronic pain resulting in reduced quality of life. It is well known that the main reason for development of the disease is abuse of alcohol and nicotine, but only little data on factors influencing outcome are available. One thousand one hundred forty-six consecutive patients who underwent surgery for chronic pancreatitis were included. Clinicopathologic data, including morphology of the pancreas in preoperative diagnostics and the histopathologic results, were evaluated. A long-term follow-up including Quality of Life and pain scores was performed. Additionally, we describe the novel Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Relief Score (CPPR-Score) as a tool for prediction of pain relief. Overall the rate of pain relief was 79.8% after surgery. The presence of an inflammatory mass in the pancreatic head larger than 4 cm (P < 0.001), presence of a dilated main pancreatic duct of over 4 mm (P < 0.001), histopathologically detected severe calcifications (P = 0.001) and severe fibrosis (P < 0.001) as well as ethanol induced disease (P < 0.001) found to be strong independent prognostic factors for pain relief. The CPPR-Score (0-5 points) proved to be a very good predictive score for pain-relief (P < 0.001). The rate of pain relief after surgical treatment in chronic pancreatitis is high and the commonly used procedures can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality. The Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Relief Score allows identifying patients who will benefit most from surgery.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
This study analyzes the clinicopathologic findings and their impact on outcome of patients so as to identify which patients benefit most from surgical treatment in chronic pancreatitis, especially in regard to pain relief.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA
The predominant symptom of chronic pancreatitis is chronic pain resulting in reduced quality of life. It is well known that the main reason for development of the disease is abuse of alcohol and nicotine, but only little data on factors influencing outcome are available.
METHODS
One thousand one hundred forty-six consecutive patients who underwent surgery for chronic pancreatitis were included. Clinicopathologic data, including morphology of the pancreas in preoperative diagnostics and the histopathologic results, were evaluated. A long-term follow-up including Quality of Life and pain scores was performed. Additionally, we describe the novel Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Relief Score (CPPR-Score) as a tool for prediction of pain relief.
RESULTS
Overall the rate of pain relief was 79.8% after surgery. The presence of an inflammatory mass in the pancreatic head larger than 4 cm (P < 0.001), presence of a dilated main pancreatic duct of over 4 mm (P < 0.001), histopathologically detected severe calcifications (P = 0.001) and severe fibrosis (P < 0.001) as well as ethanol induced disease (P < 0.001) found to be strong independent prognostic factors for pain relief. The CPPR-Score (0-5 points) proved to be a very good predictive score for pain-relief (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The rate of pain relief after surgical treatment in chronic pancreatitis is high and the commonly used procedures can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality. The Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Relief Score allows identifying patients who will benefit most from surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31348039
pii: 00000658-202104000-00026
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003439
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
800-805Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Etemad B, Whitcomb DC. Chronic pancreatitis, diagnosis, classification, and new genetic developments. Gastroenterology 2001; 120:682–707.
Steer ML, Waxman I, Freedman S. Chronic pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:1482–1490.
Kleeff J, Friess H, Korc M, et al. Chronic pancreatitis, pathogenesis and molecular aspects. Ann Ital Chir 2000; 71:3–10.
Plagemann S, Welte M, Izbicki JR, et al. Surgical treatment for chronic pancreatitis, past, present, and future. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017; 2017:8418372.
Ammann RW, Akovbiantz A, Largiader F, et al. Course and outcome of chronic pancreatitis. Longitudinal study of a mixed medical-surgical series of 245 patients. Gastroenterology 1984; 86:820–828.
Hoffmeister A, Mayerle J, Beglinger C, et al. English language version of the S3-consensus guidelines on chronic pancreatitis, definition, aetiology, diagnostic examinations, medical, endoscopic and surgical management of chronic pancreatitis. Z Gastroenterol 2015; 53:1447–1495.
Lankisch PG. Natural course of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2001; 1:3–14.
Díte P, Ruzicka M, Zboril V, et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing endoscopic and surgical therapy for chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2003; 35:553–558.
Cahen DL, Gouma DJ, Nio Y, et al. Endoscopic versus surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:676–684.
Cahen DL, Gouma DJ, Laramée P, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic vs surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2011; 141:1690–1695.
Keck T, Adam U, Makowiec F, et al. Short- and long-term results of duodenum preservation versus resection for the management of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective, randomized study. Surgery 2012; 152:S95–S102.
Izbicki JR, Bloechle C, Broering DC, et al. Longitudinal V-shaped excision of the ventral pancreas for small duct disease in severe chronic pancreatitis: prospective evaluation of a new surgical procedure. Ann Surg 1998; 227:213–219.
Diener MK, Hüttner FJ, Kieser M, et al. Partial pancreatoduodenectomy versus duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in chronic pancreatitis: the multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind ChroPac trial. Lancet 2017; 390:1027–1037.
Bachmann K, Kutup A, Mann O, et al. Surgical treatment in chronic pancreatitis timing and type of procedure. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 24:299–310.
Keck T, Wellner UF, Riediger H, et al. Long-term outcome after 92 duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections for chronic pancreatitis: comparison of Beger and Frey procedures. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14:549–556.
Strate T, Bachmann K, Busch P, et al. Resection vs drainage in treatment of chronic pancreatitis: long-term results of a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2008; 134:1406–1411.
Strate T, Taherpour Z, Bloechle C, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing the Beger and Frey procedures for patients suffering from chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 2005; 241:591–598.
Izbicki JR, Bloechle C, Knoefel WT, et al. Duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas in chronic pancreatitis. A prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 1995; 221:350–358.
Izbicki JR, Bloechle C, Broering DC, et al. Extended drainage versus resection in surgery for chronic pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial comparing the longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy combined with local pancreatic head excision with the pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 1998; 228:771–779.
Büchler MW, Friess H, Müller MW, et al. Randomized trial of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pylorus-preserving Whipple in chronic pancreatitis. Am J Surg 1995; 169:65–69.
Köninger J, Seiler CM, Sauerland S, et al. Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection—a randomized controlled trial comparing the original Beger procedure with the Berne modification (ISRCTN No. 50638764). Surgery 2008; 143:490–498.
Bachmann K, Tomkoetter L, Erbes J, et al. Beger and Frey procedures for treatment of chronic pancreatitis: comparison of outcomes at 16-year follow-up. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 219:208–216.
Bachmann K, Tomkoetter L, Kutup A, et al. Is the Whipple procedure harmful for long-term outcome in treatment of chronic pancreatitis? 15-years follow-up comparing the outcome after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy and Frey procedure in chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 2013; 258:815–820.
Klaiber U, Alldinger I, Probst P, et al. Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection, 10-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing the Beger procedure with the Berne modification. Surgery 2016; 160:127–135.
Sinha A, Patel YA, Cruise M, et al. Predictors of post-operative pain relief in patients with chronic pancreatitis undergoing the Frey or Whipple procedure. J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 20:734–740.
Cooper MA, Makary MA, Ng J, et al. Extent of pancreatic fibrosis as a determinant of symptom resolution after the Frey procedure: a clinico-pathologic analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17:682–687.
Bloechle C, Izbicki JR, Knoefel WT, et al. Quality of life in chronic pancreatitis—results after duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas. Pancreas 1995; 11:77–85.
Hadidi A. Pancreatic duct diameter: sonographic measurement in normal subjects. J Clin Ultrasound 1983; 11:17–22.
Detlefsen S, Sipos B, Feyerabend B, et al. Pancreatic fibrosis associated with age and ductal papillary hyperplasia. Virchows Arch 2005; 447:800–805.
Klöppel G, Maillet B. Pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis: a morphological analysis of 57 resection specimens and 9 autopsy pancreata. Pancreas 1991; 6:266–274.
Traverso LW, Tompkins RK, Urrea PT, et al. Surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Twenty-two years’ experience. Ann Surg 1979; 190:312–319.
Ramesh H, Jacob G, Lekha V, et al. Ductal drainage with head coring in chronic pancreatitis with small-duct disease. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2003; 10:366–372.
Shrikhande SV, Kleeff J, Friess H, et al. Management of pain in small duct chronic pancreatitis. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10:227–233.
Di Sebastiano P, Di Mola FF, Bockman DE, et al. Chronic pancreatitis: the perspective of pain generation by neuroimmune interaction. Gut 2003; 52:907–911.
Ceyhan GO, Bergmann F, Kadihasanoglu M, et al. Pancreatic neuropathy and neuropathic pain—a comprehensive pathomorphological study of 546 cases. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 177–186.e1.
Bouwense SAW, Vries Mde, Schreuder LTW, et al. Systematic mechanism-orientated approach to chronic pancreatitis pain. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:47–59.
Müller MW, Friess H, Martin DJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing Beger with pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure for chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2008; 95:350–356.
Diener MK, Rahbari NN, Fischer L, et al. Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2008; 247:950–961.