Reprint - Ureteral stent vs. no ureteral stent for ureteroscopy in the management of renal and ureteral calculi: A Cochrane review.
Journal
Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
ISSN: 1911-6470
Titre abrégé: Can Urol Assoc J
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101312644
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
28
7
2019
medline:
28
7
2019
entrez:
27
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to assess the effects of postoperative ureteral stent placement after uncomplicated ureteroscopy. We performed a comprehensive search with no restrictions on publication language or status up to February 1, 2019. We only included randomized trials. Two review authors independently examined full-text reports, identified relevant studies, assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and assessed the certainty of the evidence according to GRADE. We included 23 studies with 2656 randomized patients. Primary outcomes: It is uncertain whether stenting reduces the number of unplanned return visits (very low certainty of evidence [CoE]). Pain on the day of surgery is probably similar (mean difference [MD] 0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13-0.78; moderate CoE). Pain on postoperative days 1-3 may show little to no difference (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.25; 95% CI -0.32-0.82; low CoE). It is uncertain whether stented patients experience more pain on postoperative days 4-30 (very low CoE). Stenting may result in little to no difference in the need for secondary interventions (risk ratio [RR] 1.15; 95% CI 0.39-3.33; low CoE). We are uncertain whether stenting reduces the need for narcotics and reduces ureteral stricture rates up to 90 days (very low CoE). Rates of hospital admission may be slightly reduced (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.32-1.55; low CoE). This review was limited to patients in whom ureteroscopy was deemed 'uncomplicated.' In addition, time intervals for the grouping for the reported degree of pain were established post-hoc. The CoE for most outcomes was rated as low or very low for methodological reasons. Findings of this review illustrate the tradeoffs of risks and benefits faced by urologists and their patients when it comes to decision-making about stent placement after uncomplicated ureteroscopy for stone disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31348748
pii: cuaj.5957
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5957
pmc: PMC7012284
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
61-68Références
Saudi Med J. 2009 Oct;30(10):1276-80
pubmed: 19838433
J Urol. 2001 Nov;166(5):1651-7
pubmed: 11586195
J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1065-9; discussion 1069
pubmed: 12576847
J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1904-9
pubmed: 21944085
J Urol. 2001 Oct;166(4):1252-4
pubmed: 11547052
Urol Res. 2009 Apr;37(2):83-8
pubmed: 19183976
Urology. 2008 May;71(5):796-800
pubmed: 18342924
BJU Int. 2004 May;93(7):1032-4; discussion 1034-5
pubmed: 15142158
J Urol. 2008 Feb;179(2):424-30
pubmed: 18076928
BMJ. 2008 May 3;336(7651):995-8
pubmed: 18456631
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120
Urology. 2011 Dec;78(6):1248-56
pubmed: 21762964
J Endourol. 2007 Sep;21(9):993-7
pubmed: 17941774
J Endourol. 2010 Aug;24(8):1263-7
pubmed: 20615145
J Urol. 2003 Apr;169(4):1257-60
pubmed: 12629338
Saudi Med J. 2006 Jun;27(6):845-8
pubmed: 16758048
Hong Kong Med J. 2015 Apr;21(2):124-30
pubmed: 25756274
Urol Res. 2008 May;36(2):115-9
pubmed: 18385992
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2006 Jun;78(2):53-6
pubmed: 16929603
J Endourol. 2002 Feb;16(1):9-13
pubmed: 11890453
J Urol. 2013 Feb;189(2):580-4
pubmed: 22982421
Minim Invasive Surg. 2014;2014:892890
pubmed: 25431663
J Urol. 2005 Jun;173(6):2022
pubmed: 15879810
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 06;2:CD012703
pubmed: 30726554
J Urol. 2001 May;165(5):1419-22
pubmed: 11342889
World J Urol. 2013 Dec;31(6):1617-25
pubmed: 23462959
BMJ. 2007 Mar 17;334(7593):572
pubmed: 17311851
J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):1977-80
pubmed: 11956421
Andrologia. 2017 Nov;49(9):
pubmed: 27882592
Urol Res. 2008 Oct;36(5):259-63
pubmed: 18797859
J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):961-5
pubmed: 18639269
J Endourol. 2017 May;31(5):446-451
pubmed: 28292209
Urology. 2018 Jul;117:44-49
pubmed: 29601836
Int J Urol. 2006 Jul;13(7):886-90
pubmed: 16882049
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0167670
pubmed: 28068364
Eur Urol. 2004 Sep;46(3):381-7; discussion 387-8
pubmed: 15306112
J Endourol. 2012 Nov;26(11):1425-30
pubmed: 22698147
World J Urol. 2011 Dec;29(6):731-6
pubmed: 21590466
J Endourol. 2003 Dec;17(10):871-4
pubmed: 14744352
J Urol. 2016 Nov;196(5):1458-1466
pubmed: 27287523