Artefact-free topography based scleral-asymmetry.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
05
02
2019
accepted:
01
07
2019
entrez:
27
7
2019
pubmed:
28
7
2019
medline:
26
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To present a three-dimensional non-parametric method for detecting scleral asymmetry using corneoscleral topography data that are free of edge-effect artefacts. The study included 88 participants aged 23 to 65 years (37.7±9.7), 47 women and 41 men. The eye topography data were exported from the Eye Surface Profiler software in MATLAB binary data container format then processed by custom built MATLAB codes entirely independent from the profiler software. Scleral asymmetry was determined initially from the unprocessed topography before being determined again after removing the edge-effect noise. Topography data were levelled around the limbus, then edge-effect was eliminated using a robust statistical moving median technique. In addition to comparing raw elevation data, scleral elevation was also compared through fitting a sphere to every single scleral surface and determining the relative elevation from the best-fit sphere reference surface. When considering the averaged raw topography elevation data in the scleral section of the eye at radius 8 mm, the average raw elevations of the right eyes' sclera were -1.5±1.77, -1.87±2.12, -1.36±1.82 and -1.57±1.87 mm. In the left eyes at the same radius the average raw elevations were -1.62±1.78, -1.82±2.07, -1.28±1.76 and -1.68±1.93 mm. While, when considering the average raw elevation of the sclera after removing the edge effect, the average raw elevations of the right eyes were -3.71±0.25, -4.06±0.23, -3.95±0.19 and -3.95±0.23 mm. In the left eyes at the same radius the average raw elevations were -3.71±0.19, -3.97±0.22, -3.96±0.19 and -3.96±0.18 mm in the nasal, temporal, superior and inferior sides respectively. Maximum raw elevation asymmetry in the averaged scleral raw elevation was 1.6647±0.9015 mm in right eyes and 1.0358±0.6842 mm in left eyes, both detected at -38° to the nasal side. Best-fit sphere-based relative elevation showed that sclera is more elevated in three main meridians at angles -40°, 76°, and 170° in right eyes and -40°, 76°, and 170° in left eyes, all measured from the nasal meridian. Maximum recorded relative elevation asymmetries were 0.0844±0.0355 mm and 0.068±0.0607 mm at angular positions 76° and 63.5° for right and left eyes in turn. It is not possible to use corneoscleral topography data to predict the scleral shape without considering a method of removing the edge-effect from the topography data. The nasal side of the sclera is higher than the temporal side, therefore, rotationally symmetric scleral contact lenses are more likely to be translated towards the temporal side. The scleral shape is best described by levelled raw elevation rather than relative elevation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31348792
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219789
pii: PONE-D-19-03528
pmc: PMC6660081
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0219789Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
L W, the clinical director of UltraVision CLPL, may use the results in this manuscript to improve the design of soft contact lenses. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. All other authors declare no potential financial or non-financial competing interests.
Références
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Oct;90(10):1066-77
pubmed: 23995515
Ophthalmology. 2009 Oct;116(10):1960-70
pubmed: 19592109
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):139-52
pubmed: 19101437
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Aug;42(4):462-466
pubmed: 30981661
Eye Contact Lens. 2007 Jan;33(1):21-5
pubmed: 17224675
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018 Apr;41(2):205-213
pubmed: 29129479
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018 Nov;38(6):609-616
pubmed: 30450747
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Feb;42(1):75-84
pubmed: 29802038
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 May;37(3):263-274
pubmed: 28439975
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Oct;90(10):1078-85
pubmed: 23974663
Optom Vis Sci. 2001 Apr;78(4):240-53
pubmed: 11349932
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Apr;39(2):88-96
pubmed: 26341076
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Jun;91(6):650-7
pubmed: 24830372
Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Apr;96(4):238-247
pubmed: 30943184
Cornea. 2018 Aug;37(8):1047-1052
pubmed: 29521692
Exp Eye Res. 2004 Mar;78(3):609-23
pubmed: 15106941
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Apr;83(4):233-6
pubmed: 16614579
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 28;9(3):e93551
pubmed: 24681550
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jun 21;51(12):3231-9
pubmed: 16757873
Am J Ophthalmol. 1995 Jun;119(6):712-22
pubmed: 7785684
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1995 Dec;73(6):501-5
pubmed: 9019372
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Jul;91(7):793-802
pubmed: 24901483
Ophthalmology. 1999 May;106(5):939-43
pubmed: 10328393
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 May 01;54(5):3691-701
pubmed: 23548617
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017 Aug;40(4):242-247
pubmed: 28495356
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan;139(1):18-29
pubmed: 15652824
Optom Vis Sci. 2018 Jun;95(6):515-522
pubmed: 29787490
J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:503645
pubmed: 25431659
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 Sep;37(5):624-625
pubmed: 28836388
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;97(2):e266-e270
pubmed: 30146759
Curr Eye Res. 2018 Nov;43(11):1404-1414
pubmed: 30009634
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Aug 29;52(9):6801-6
pubmed: 21685339
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 5;13(12):e0206684
pubmed: 30517101
Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S210-S215
pubmed: 28328725
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016 May;36(3):266-78
pubmed: 27112224
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 09;52(7):4091-7
pubmed: 21372023
J Ophthalmol. 2011;2011:764183
pubmed: 21969910
Retina. 2015 Nov;35(11):2163-80
pubmed: 26428607
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;28(2):81-7
pubmed: 24843299
Clin Exp Optom. 2016 Mar;99(2):149-56
pubmed: 26928568
Micron. 2001 Apr;32(3):261-72
pubmed: 11006506
Clin Exp Optom. 2019 May;102(3):224-241
pubmed: 30062745
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 26;13(11):e0207710
pubmed: 30475843