A Protocol for the Ethical Assessment of Wild Animal-Visitor Interactions (AVIP) Evaluating Animal Welfare, Education, and Conservation Outcomes.

Giraffa camelopardalis One Welfare animal welfare animal–visitor interactions conservation education ethical matrix ethics risk assessment wildlife tourism zoo visitors

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Jul 2019
Historique:
received: 23 05 2019
revised: 18 07 2019
accepted: 22 07 2019
entrez: 28 7 2019
pubmed: 28 7 2019
medline: 28 7 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Due to the popularity of wild animal-visitor interactions (AVIs), there is a need for an ethical assessment of their impact on animal welfare, education, and conservation. The protocol presented in this study is designed to evaluate such interactions on an integrated level, using a transparent analysis of all the aspects involved, including all the stakeholders and the potential conflicts of values. The protocol consists of a six-step process encompassing dedicated data acquisition and a specific ethical assessment. When the protocol was applied to assess a "giraffe feeding" interaction, steps devoted to data acquisition found that animal welfare risks were low, and that visitors described giraffes with emotionally linked descriptors more often after the interaction. The net promoter score, which refers to how likely visitors would recommend to a friend to join the animal-visitor interaction, was 74%. The subsequent ethical assessment, which consisted of a comparison of the results of the previous steps with an ethical matrix highlighting the ideal situation for all stakeholders' interests, allowed the overall identification of the ethical concerns entailed by the interaction. A final ethical checklist of the examined AVI had a "yes" in entries regarding animal welfare, emotional, and conservation mindedness outcomes and ethical assessment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31349726
pii: ani9080487
doi: 10.3390/ani9080487
pmc: PMC6721246
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Authors have no conflicts of interests.

Références

Rev Sci Tech. 2001 Apr;20(1):291-303
pubmed: 11288517
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2002;5(2):125-37
pubmed: 12738581
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Nov;69(11):6370-9
pubmed: 14602588
Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Dec;81(12):46-54, 124
pubmed: 14712543
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2005 Dec;138(4):324-7
pubmed: 16224192
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Jan;73(1):362-5
pubmed: 17071798
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2006 Nov;18(6):597-600
pubmed: 17121091
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2007;10(2):169-83
pubmed: 17559323
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 Mar 6;58(8):194-8
pubmed: 19265780
PLoS Biol. 2010 Jun 29;8(6):e1000412
pubmed: 20613859
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012 Jan;44(1):77-85
pubmed: 21643664
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32842
pubmed: 22412932
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;54 Suppl 5:S472-9
pubmed: 22572672
Zoo Biol. 2013 Jan-Feb;32(1):45-53
pubmed: 22622768
Zoo Biol. 2013 Jan-Feb;32(1):13-8
pubmed: 22674295
Zoonoses Public Health. 2015 Sep;62(6):438-44
pubmed: 25388917
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2015 Jan 1;246(1):16-8
pubmed: 25654818
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 21;10(10):e0138939
pubmed: 26489092
Meat Sci. 2016 Jul;117:68-74
pubmed: 26946479
Microbiol Spectr. 2015 Dec;3(6):
pubmed: 27337283
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2017 Feb;14(2):59-73
pubmed: 27992253
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2015 Dec 12;5(1):88-109
pubmed: 28560163
Behav Processes. 2018 Nov;156:83-95
pubmed: 29113925
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jul 28;8(8):null
pubmed: 30060544
Animals (Basel). 2018 Aug 30;8(9):null
pubmed: 30200194
Int J Med Microbiol. 2018 Oct;308(7):927-932
pubmed: 30257809
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Dec 13;85(1):
pubmed: 30413480
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2018 Dec 19;25(4):593-595
pubmed: 30586985
Animals (Basel). 2019 Jun 06;9(6):null
pubmed: 31174380
Animals (Basel). 2019 Jun 08;9(6):null
pubmed: 31181769
Behav Neurosci. 1983 Dec;97(6):1005-16
pubmed: 6651957
Int J Parasitol. 1996 Nov;26(11):1331-3
pubmed: 9024881

Auteurs

Barbara de Mori (B)

Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, Università degli Studi di Padova, viale dell'Università 16, Agripolis, 35020 Legnaro PD, Italy.
Ethics Laboratory for Veterinary Medicine, Conservation, and Animal Welfare, Università degli Studi di Padova, viale dell'Università 16, Agripolis, 35020 Legnaro PD, Italy.

Linda Ferrante (L)

Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, Università degli Studi di Padova, viale dell'Università 16, Agripolis, 35020 Legnaro PD, Italy. linda.ferrante@phd.unipd.it.
Ethics Laboratory for Veterinary Medicine, Conservation, and Animal Welfare, Università degli Studi di Padova, viale dell'Università 16, Agripolis, 35020 Legnaro PD, Italy. linda.ferrante@phd.unipd.it.

Daniela Florio (D)

Ethics Laboratory for Veterinary Medicine, Conservation, and Animal Welfare, Università degli Studi di Padova, viale dell'Università 16, Agripolis, 35020 Legnaro PD, Italy.
Department of Veterinary Medical Science, Università degli Studi di Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano dell'Emilia BO, Italy.

Elisabetta Macchi (E)

Department of Veterinary Science, Università degli Studi di Torino, largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy.

Ilaria Pollastri (I)

Department of Veterinary Science, Università degli Studi di Torino, largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy.

Simona Normando (S)

Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, Università degli Studi di Padova, viale dell'Università 16, Agripolis, 35020 Legnaro PD, Italy.
Ethics Laboratory for Veterinary Medicine, Conservation, and Animal Welfare, Università degli Studi di Padova, viale dell'Università 16, Agripolis, 35020 Legnaro PD, Italy.

Classifications MeSH