Antithrombotic therapy in the early phase of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
/ diagnosis
Anticoagulants
/ administration & dosage
Fibrinolytic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Hemorrhage
/ chemically induced
Humans
Myocardial Revascularization
/ adverse effects
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction
/ diagnosis
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Anticoagulant
Antiplatelet
Antithrombotic therapy
Early phase
NSTE-ACS
Journal
European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy
ISSN: 2055-6845
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101669491
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 01 2020
01 01 2020
Historique:
received:
21
05
2019
revised:
27
06
2019
accepted:
20
07
2019
pubmed:
28
7
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
28
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite the increasing use of early invasive strategies in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), optimal initial antithrombotic therapy (ATT) based on the safety/efficacy profile of all guideline-recommended combinations remains crucial for the early management of both medically and invasively treated NSTE-ACS patients. Randomized controlled trials on ATT in NSTE-ACS/unstable angina reporting early (within 14 days) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleeding were selected. Overall, 3799 studies were screened, 117 clinical trials were assessed as potentially eligible, 20 trials were included in the study. According to treatment and type of intervention, nine different meta-analyses were performed including a total of 88 748 patients. A significant reduction of trial-defined MACE was found for aspirin vs. placebo [odds ratio (OR), 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34-0.96], heparin vs. placebo (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15-0.97), aspirin + heparin vs. placebo (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18-0.59), aspirin + heparin vs. aspirin (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42-0.79), aspirin + low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) vs. aspirin + unfractionated heparin (UFH; OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95) and aspirin + ticagrelor/prasugrel + heparins vs. aspirin + clopidogrel + heparins (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.94). A significant decrease in major bleeding was found only for fondaparinux vs. LMWH on the background of aspirin + clopidogrel (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.44-0.62) despite a clear trend towards increased bleeding for heparin compared to aspirin, aspirin + heparin compared to placebo, aspirin + heparin compared to aspirin, aspirin + P2Y12inhibitors + UFH/LMWH compared to aspirin + UFH/LMWH, and aspirin + ticagrelor/prasugrel + heparins compared to aspirin + clopidogrel + heparins. To our knowledge, these findings are the first to report the safety and efficacy of all the various combinations of currently recommended ATT for the early management of NSTE-ACS, providing a comprehensive evidence-base to guide decisions depending on the patients' bleeding risk and treatment strategy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31350546
pii: 5539751
doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz031
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Fibrinolytic Agents
0
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
43-56Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.