Comparison of PSMA-ligand PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in the pelvis.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antigens, Surface
/ chemistry
Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II
/ chemistry
Humans
Ligands
Male
Middle Aged
Multimodal Imaging
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ diagnostic imaging
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Reference Values
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
68Ga-PSMA-11
MRI
PET/CT
PSMA
Prostate cancer
Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen
Journal
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
ISSN: 1619-7089
Titre abrégé: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101140988
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
15
05
2019
accepted:
11
07
2019
pubmed:
28
7
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
28
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
So far, there have been very few studies which provide a direct comparison between MRI and PSMA-ligand PET/CT for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer (rPC). This present study therefore aims to provide further clinical data in order to resolve this urgent clinical question, and thereby strengthen clinical recommendations. A retrospective analysis was performed for patients who were scanned at our institution with whole-body PSMA-PET/CT (tracer: 68Ga-PSMA-11) between January 2017 and September 2018 in order to detect rPC. Amongst them, 43 underwent an additional pelvic MRI within 2 months. Both modalities were compared as follows: a consensus read of the PET data was performed by two nuclear physicians. All lesions were recorded with respect to their type and localization. The same process was conducted by two radiologists for pelvic MRI. Thereafter, both modalities were directly compared for every patient and lesion. Overall, 30/43 patients (69.8%) presented with a pathologic MRI and 38/43 (88.4%) with a pathologic PSMA-PET/CT of the pelvis. MRI detected 53 pelvic rPC lesions (13 of them classified as "uncertain") and PSMA-PET/CT detected 75 pelvic lesions (three classified as "uncertain"). The superiority of PSMA-PET/CT was statistically significant only if uncertain lesions were classified as false-positive. PSMA-PET/CT detected more pelvic lesions characteristic for rPC when compared to MRI. In order to detect rPC, a potential future scenario could be conducting first a PSMA-PET/CT. Combining the advantages of both modalities in hybrid PET/MRI scanners would be an ideal future scenario.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31350604
doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04438-w
pii: 10.1007/s00259-019-04438-w
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, Surface
0
Ligands
0
FOLH1 protein, human
EC 3.4.17.21
Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II
EC 3.4.17.21
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2289-2297Références
Mol Imaging. 2018 Jan-Dec;17:1536012118776068
pubmed: 29873291
Urol Clin North Am. 2018 Aug;45(3):407-425
pubmed: 30031462
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 May;41(5):887-97
pubmed: 24352789
Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):862-874
pubmed: 27289567
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan;27(1):21-33
pubmed: 27986208
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Jun;39(6):1085-6
pubmed: 22310854
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Aug;44(8):1258-1268
pubmed: 28497198
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):530-4
pubmed: 25957851
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Jan;41(1):11-20
pubmed: 24072344
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629
pubmed: 27568654
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
J Nucl Med. 2019 Jun;60(6):794-800
pubmed: 30442757
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Oct;45(11):1884-1897
pubmed: 29876619
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 May;43(5):898-905
pubmed: 26563122
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Feb;42(2):197-209
pubmed: 25411132
Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):553-557
pubmed: 26810345
Eur Urol. 2018 May;73(5):656-661
pubmed: 29358059
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Jul;43(8):1410-7
pubmed: 26993315
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Jul;46(7):1542-1550
pubmed: 30879122
Prostate. 2015 Dec;75(16):1934-40
pubmed: 26356236
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2014 Jun 30;7(7):779-96
pubmed: 24983957
J Nucl Med. 2016 Oct;57(Suppl 3):79S-89S
pubmed: 27694178
J Nucl Med. 2017 Sep;58(Suppl 2):67S-76S
pubmed: 28864615
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Aug;211(2):286-294
pubmed: 29949419
Urol Clin North Am. 2003 May;30(2):219-26
pubmed: 12735499
J Nucl Med. 2016 Nov;57(11):1713-1719
pubmed: 27261524
J Nucl Med. 2015 May;56(5):668-74
pubmed: 25791990
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Apr;40(4):486-95
pubmed: 23179945
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Apr;46(4):901-907
pubmed: 30617554