Comparison of penh, fluka, and Geant4/topas for absorbed dose calculations in air cavities representing ionization chambers in high-energy photon and proton beams.

Monte Carlo simulation beam quality correction factors dosimetry high-energy photon and proton radiation radiation therapy

Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 03 12 2018
revised: 01 07 2019
accepted: 16 07 2019
pubmed: 28 7 2019
medline: 14 2 2020
entrez: 28 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The purpose of this work is to analyze whether the Monte Carlo codes penh, fluka, and geant4/topas are suitable to calculate absorbed doses and We used penh, fluka, geant4/topas, and egsnrc to calculate the absorbed dose to water in a reference water cavity and the absorbed dose to air in two air cavities representative of a plane-parallel and a cylindrical ionization chamber in a 1.25 MeV photon beam and a 150 MeV proton beam - egsnrc was only used for the photon beam calculations. The physics and transport settings in each code were adjusted to simulate the particle transport as detailed as reasonably possible. From these absorbed doses, The absorbed doses agreed within 1.4% or better between the individual codes for both the photon and proton simulations. The penh, fluka, and geant4/topas are capable of calculating beam quality correction factors in proton beams. The differences in the

Identifiants

pubmed: 31350915
doi: 10.1002/mp.13737
pmc: PMC6851981
doi:

Substances chimiques

Protons 0
Water 059QF0KO0R

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

4639-4653

Subventions

Organisme : European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research
ID : 16NRM03
Organisme : European Union's Horizon 2020
Organisme : Research Foundation - Flanders
Organisme : Flemish Government Department EWI

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Med Phys. 2016 Aug;43(8):4915
pubmed: 27487908
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Oct 7;55(19):5833-47
pubmed: 20844337
Med Phys. 1995 Nov;22(11 Pt 1):1749-52
pubmed: 8587528
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Sep 7;59(17):4961-71
pubmed: 25109620
Phys Med. 2013 Mar;29(2):163-70
pubmed: 22277185
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jul 21;51(14):3533-48
pubmed: 16825747
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Sep 21;49(18):4427-44
pubmed: 15509075
J ICRU. 2005 Jun;5(1):0
pubmed: 24170851
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Oct 7;58(19):6593-621
pubmed: 24018471
Med Phys. 2019 Feb;46(2):885-891
pubmed: 30414268
J ICRU. 2014 Apr;14(1):31-48
pubmed: 27789597
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Jun 21;57(12):3759-84
pubmed: 22617050
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Mar 21;61(6):2389-406
pubmed: 26943497
Med Phys. 2012 Nov;39(11):6818-37
pubmed: 23127075
Med Phys. 2000 Mar;27(3):499-513
pubmed: 10757602
Phys Med Biol. 2000 Apr;45(4):971-81
pubmed: 10795985
Med Phys. 1999 Sep;26(9):1847-70
pubmed: 10505874
Phys Med Biol. 1986 Aug;31(8):839-58
pubmed: 3094045
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Oct 7;60(19):7637-53
pubmed: 26389610
Med Phys. 2003 Jul;30(7):1706-11
pubmed: 12906187
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Aug 01;63(15):155015
pubmed: 29974869
Med Phys. 2010 Nov;37(11):5939-50
pubmed: 21158307
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Aug 29;63(17):175002
pubmed: 30088808
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Oct 21;52(20):6243-59
pubmed: 17921583
Med Phys. 2018 Jan;45(1):e1-e5
pubmed: 29178605
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Nov 7;53(21):5917-26
pubmed: 18836218
Med Phys. 2000 Dec;27(12):2763-79
pubmed: 11190960
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Apr 7;57(7):1831-54
pubmed: 22411097
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Mar 21;51(6):1503-21
pubmed: 16510959
Med Phys. 2010 Jan;37(1):154-63
pubmed: 20175477
Med Phys. 2002 Dec;29(12):2745-52
pubmed: 12512706
Med Phys. 2014 Jan;41(1):011706
pubmed: 24387498
Med Phys. 2000 Mar;27(3):485-98
pubmed: 10757601
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Apr 21;58(8):2509-22
pubmed: 23514896
Radiat Environ Biophys. 1999 Dec;38(4):229-37
pubmed: 10654344
Med Phys. 2013 Dec;40(12):121719
pubmed: 24320505
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Jun 07;63(11):115013
pubmed: 29737969
Med Phys. 2013 Nov;40(11):111705
pubmed: 24320413
Phys Med Biol. 1999 Mar;44(3):647-63
pubmed: 10211800
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jul 06;62(15):5959-5974
pubmed: 28682790
Med Phys. 2011 Aug;38(8):4600-9
pubmed: 21928633
J Radiat Res. 2013 Jul;54 Suppl 1:i91-6
pubmed: 23824133
Phys Med Biol. 2013 May 7;58(9):2879-99
pubmed: 23571094
Front Oncol. 2016 May 11;6:116
pubmed: 27242956
Med Phys. 2008 Apr;35(4):1328-36
pubmed: 18491527
Med Phys. 2011 Nov;38(11):5887-95
pubmed: 22047353

Auteurs

Kilian-Simon Baumann (KS)

Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University of Applied Sciences, Giessen, Germany.

Felix Horst (F)

Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University of Applied Sciences, Giessen, Germany.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany.

Klemens Zink (K)

Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University of Applied Sciences, Giessen, Germany.
Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), Frankfurt, Germany.

Carles Gomà (C)

Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Articles similaires

Animals Dietary Fiber Dextran Sulfate Mice Disease Models, Animal
Silicon Dioxide Water Hot Temperature Compressive Strength X-Ray Diffraction
1.00
Oryza Agricultural Irrigation Potassium Sodium Soil
Tissue Plasminogen Activator Retina Air Pressure Humans

Classifications MeSH