Effects of Acute Tryptophan Depletion on Repetitive Behavior in Laying Hens.

ATD cognition domestic birds feather pecking operant chamber

Journal

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 20 09 2018
accepted: 25 06 2019
entrez: 30 7 2019
pubmed: 30 7 2019
medline: 30 7 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Repetitive pecking at the feather cover of other birds (FP) is one of the most important welfare problems in domestic birds. It is not only characterized by motor symptoms, but also by an innate vulnerability of the serotonergic system. Moreover, the serotonergic system influences cognitive function. Acute tryptophan depletion (ATD) is a widely used method for studying serotonergic function in mammals and has been recently validated in birds. However, a tryptophan-deficient amino acid mixture has never been tested on groups of birds to impact their social behavior, including repetitive feather pecking, nor has it been given to potentially impact their cognition and motor performance. One hundred and sixty White Leghorn laying hens consisting of two genetic lines divergently selected to perform high (H) or low (L) levels of FP, and an unselected control line (UC), were kept in 10 groups consisting of 4 H, 3 L, and 9 UC genotypes. In a counterbalanced order, half of the groups were first subjected to an ATD treatment, while the other half were first given a balanced control (BC) treatment, and vice versa, after which their feather pecking behavior was observed. The effect of ATD/BC on repetitive pecking, motor performance, and cognition was investigated in a 5-s delayed reward task in an operant chamber with 10 phenotypic feather peckers, 10 recipients of feather pecking, and 10 bystanders (who neither performed nor received feather pecks). ATD given to groups of birds induced gentle, repetitive feather pecking in all genotypes. Following ATD, phenotypic feather peckers performed more poorly during the delayed reward task, as seen by their higher number of repetitive, non-rewarded key, and non-key pecks in the operant chamber. In conclusion, ATD impacted the hens' social behavior by increasing the number of repetitive gentle feather pecks at conspecifics. Furthermore, feather peckers were more likely to peck while waiting for a reward after ATD, suggesting a role for the serotonergic system on cognition in these birds.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31355217
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00230
pmc: PMC6637846
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

230

Références

Br Poult Sci. 1998 Dec;39 Suppl:S17-8
pubmed: 10188023
Br Poult Sci. 1999 Dec;40(5):579-84
pubmed: 10670667
Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Jun;71(6):1536-44
pubmed: 10837296
Anim Behav. 2000 Aug;60(2):211-216
pubmed: 10973723
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2001 Mar 2;71(3):229-239
pubmed: 11230903
Physiol Behav. 2002 Apr 15;75(5):653-9
pubmed: 12020730
Mol Psychiatry. 2003 Nov;8(12):951-73
pubmed: 14647394
Behav Neurosci. 2004 Jun;118(3):575-83
pubmed: 15174935
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005 Jul;39(7):558-64
pubmed: 15996136
Poult Sci. 2006 Jan;85(1):21-5
pubmed: 16493941
J Neural Transm Gen Sect. 1990;79(1-2):25-34
pubmed: 1688706
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2007 Aug;10(4):449-61
pubmed: 16893493
Behav Brain Res. 2007 Jan 10;176(1):66-74
pubmed: 16997392
Behav Genet. 2009 Sep;39(5):564-70
pubmed: 19526353
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;195(2):102-8
pubmed: 19648538
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2009 Jun;7(2):150-7
pubmed: 19949574
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):356-65
pubmed: 20153769
Behav Genet. 2010 Sep;40(5):715-27
pubmed: 20496162
Mol Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;16(7):695-713
pubmed: 21339754
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 25;368(1615):20110375
pubmed: 23440461
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989;98(4):508-11
pubmed: 2505291
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Jun 1;327:11-20
pubmed: 28347825
Poult Sci. 2017 Sep 1;96(9):3021-3025
pubmed: 28641389
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Dec;95:170-188
pubmed: 30055196
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1986 Jul;25(1):1-6
pubmed: 3749215
Behaviour. 1974;49(3):227-67
pubmed: 4597405
J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Mar;69(2):103-22
pubmed: 9540229

Auteurs

Patrick Birkl (P)

Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Jacqueline Chow (J)

Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Peter McBride (P)

Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Joergen B Kjaer (JB)

Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Institute of Animal Welfare and Animal Husbandry, Celle, Germany.

Wolfgang Kunze (W)

Department of Medicine, Brain-Body Institute and Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Paul Forsythe (P)

Department of Medicine, Brain-Body Institute and Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek (A)

Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Classifications MeSH