Guidewire-assisted vs. direct radial arterial cannulation in neonates and infants: A randomised controlled trial.
Anesthesia, General
Anesthesiology
/ instrumentation
Catheterization, Peripheral
/ instrumentation
Female
Hospitals, Pediatric
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Palpation
/ methods
Prospective Studies
Radial Artery
/ diagnostic imaging
Reproducibility of Results
Surgical Instruments
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography
Ultrasonography, Interventional
/ methods
Journal
European journal of anaesthesiology
ISSN: 1365-2346
Titre abrégé: Eur J Anaesthesiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8411711
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
30
7
2019
medline:
9
7
2020
entrez:
30
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cannulation of the radial artery is challenging to perform in neonates and infants because of the small vessel size. To compare guidewire-assisted with direct radial artery cannulation in neonates and infants. A randomised controlled study. A tertiary university hospital from 7 August 2017 to 4 July 2018. Ninety neonates and infants who required radial artery cannulation during general anaesthesia. All patients were allocated randomly into the guidewire group (guidewire-assisted cannulation, n=45) or control group (direct cannulation, n=45). Radial artery cannulation was performed under general anaesthesia. The contralateral radial artery was used if the arterial cannulation was not successful within two attempts. After the second failure in the contralateral radial artery, the case was considered a failure. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate of radial artery cannulation. The secondary outcomes included the overall success rate, overall procedure time, number of attempts and use of the contralateral radial artery for radial artery cannulation. The guidewire group showed a higher first-attempt success rate [76 vs. 56%; P = 0.046; odds ratio (OR) 2.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) of odds 1.01 to 6.08] and overall success rate (96 vs. 76%; P = 0.007; OR 6.96; 95% CI 1.44 to 33.52) than the control group. The overall procedure time was not significantly different between the guidewire group (median [IQR] 36 [28.0 to 70.5] s) and control group (98 [23.5 to 465.0] s; P = 0.400). There was no difference in the median number of attempts between the two groups (P = 0.454). However, use of the contralateral radial artery was significantly lower in the guidewire group (17.8%) than in the control group (40%; P = 0.020; OR 0.324, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.86). Kaplan-Meier analysis of the overall procedure time to successful radial artery cannulation showed that the overall success rate was significantly higher in the guidewire group than in the control group (P = 0.019). For radial artery cannulation in neonates and infants, guidewire-assisted radial artery cannulation showed superiority over the direct technique in terms of first-attempt success rate and overall success rate without delaying the procedure time. Clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT03217019).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Cannulation of the radial artery is challenging to perform in neonates and infants because of the small vessel size.
OBJECTIVE
To compare guidewire-assisted with direct radial artery cannulation in neonates and infants.
DESIGN
A randomised controlled study.
SETTING
A tertiary university hospital from 7 August 2017 to 4 July 2018.
PATIENTS
Ninety neonates and infants who required radial artery cannulation during general anaesthesia.
INTERVENTIONS
All patients were allocated randomly into the guidewire group (guidewire-assisted cannulation, n=45) or control group (direct cannulation, n=45). Radial artery cannulation was performed under general anaesthesia. The contralateral radial artery was used if the arterial cannulation was not successful within two attempts. After the second failure in the contralateral radial artery, the case was considered a failure.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate of radial artery cannulation. The secondary outcomes included the overall success rate, overall procedure time, number of attempts and use of the contralateral radial artery for radial artery cannulation.
RESULTS
The guidewire group showed a higher first-attempt success rate [76 vs. 56%; P = 0.046; odds ratio (OR) 2.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) of odds 1.01 to 6.08] and overall success rate (96 vs. 76%; P = 0.007; OR 6.96; 95% CI 1.44 to 33.52) than the control group. The overall procedure time was not significantly different between the guidewire group (median [IQR] 36 [28.0 to 70.5] s) and control group (98 [23.5 to 465.0] s; P = 0.400). There was no difference in the median number of attempts between the two groups (P = 0.454). However, use of the contralateral radial artery was significantly lower in the guidewire group (17.8%) than in the control group (40%; P = 0.020; OR 0.324, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.86). Kaplan-Meier analysis of the overall procedure time to successful radial artery cannulation showed that the overall success rate was significantly higher in the guidewire group than in the control group (P = 0.019).
CONCLUSION
For radial artery cannulation in neonates and infants, guidewire-assisted radial artery cannulation showed superiority over the direct technique in terms of first-attempt success rate and overall success rate without delaying the procedure time.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT03217019).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31356376
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001064
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03217019']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM