Clinical Examination for the Prediction of Mortality in the Critically Ill: The Simple Intensive Care Studies-I.
Journal
Critical care medicine
ISSN: 1530-0293
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0355501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
30
7
2019
medline:
15
5
2020
entrez:
30
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Caregivers use clinical examination to timely recognize deterioration of a patient, yet data on the prognostic value of clinical examination are inconsistent. In the Simple Intensive Care Studies-I, we evaluated the association of clinical examination findings with 90-day mortality in critically ill patients. Prospective single-center cohort study. ICU of a single tertiary care level hospital between March 27, 2015, and July 22, 2017. All consecutive adults acutely admitted to the ICU and expected to stay for at least 24 hours. A protocolized clinical examination of 19 clinical signs conducted within 24 hours of admission. Independent predictors of 90-day mortality were identified using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Model performance was compared with established prognostic risk scores using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves. Robustness of our findings was tested by internal bootstrap validation and adjustment of the threshold for statistical significance. A total of 1,075 patients were included, of whom 298 patients (28%) had died at 90-day follow-up. Multivariable analyses adjusted for age and norepinephrine infusion rate demonstrated that the combination of higher respiratory rate, higher systolic blood pressure, lower central temperature, altered consciousness, and decreased urine output was independently associated with 90-day mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.71-0.78). Clinical examination had a similar discriminative value as compared with the Simplified Acute Physiology Score-II (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.73-0.79; p = 0.29) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-IV (using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.74-0.80; p = 0.16) and was significantly better than the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.64-0.71; p < 0.001). Clinical examination has reasonable discriminative value for assessing 90-day mortality in acutely admitted ICU patients. In our study population, a single, protocolized clinical examination had similar prognostic abilities compared with the Simplified Acute Physiology Score-II and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-IV and outperformed the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31356472
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003897
pmc: PMC6750157
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1301-1309Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
J Vis Exp. 2019 Jan 16;(143):null
pubmed: 30735183
Crit Care Clin. 2007 Jul;23(3):639-58
pubmed: 17900487
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Aug;31(8):1066-71
pubmed: 15973520
Crit Care. 2016 Mar 12;20:56
pubmed: 26968689
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Mar;62(3):336-346
pubmed: 29210058
QJM. 2001 Oct;94(10):521-6
pubmed: 11588210
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jul;35(7):1225-33
pubmed: 19189077
Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99
pubmed: 21225900
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1695-1705
pubmed: 27686349
Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Sep;17(9):932-5
pubmed: 3415066
Stat Med. 2008 Jan 30;27(2):157-72; discussion 207-12
pubmed: 17569110
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):162
pubmed: 29207961
Intensive Care Med. 2011 May;37(5):801-7
pubmed: 21373821
JAMA. 1992 May 20;267(19):2638-44
pubmed: 1573753
J Trauma. 1987 Apr;27(4):370-8
pubmed: 3106646
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Jul;3(7):544-53
pubmed: 26003390
Kidney Int. 2016 Jan;89(1):200-8
pubmed: 27169784
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Apr;40(4):513-27
pubmed: 24570265
Kidney Int. 2011 Oct;80(7):760-7
pubmed: 21716258
Crit Care Med. 1980 Apr;8(4):201-8
pubmed: 7357873
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Nov 21;14:120
pubmed: 25416419
Trials. 2016 Aug 02;17:384
pubmed: 27484695
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Dec;40(12):1795-815
pubmed: 25392034
Crit Care Med. 2019 May;47(5):685-690
pubmed: 30730443
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Mar;41(3):452-9
pubmed: 25516087
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Mar;42(3):479-480
pubmed: 26687581
Shock. 2017 May;47(5):574-581
pubmed: 27755509
Lancet Respir Med. 2014 May;2(5):380-6
pubmed: 24740011
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017 Aug;23(4):293-301
pubmed: 28570301
Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):934-8
pubmed: 19237899
JAMA. 1993 Dec 22-29;270(24):2957-63
pubmed: 8254858
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul;40(7):958-64
pubmed: 24811942
Anesth Analg. 2013 Feb;116(2):351-6
pubmed: 23302972
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):1923-1933
pubmed: 30130262
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 27;7(9):e017170
pubmed: 28963297
J Crit Care. 2008 Dec;23(4):475-83
pubmed: 19056010
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1297-310
pubmed: 16540951