Non-medical prescribing in the United Kingdom National Health Service: A systematic policy review.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
15
03
2019
accepted:
09
07
2019
entrez:
30
7
2019
pubmed:
30
7
2019
medline:
19
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Non-medical prescribing was introduced into the United Kingdom (UK) to improve patient care, through extending healthcare professionals' roles. More recent government health service policy focuses on the increased demand and the need for efficiency. This systematic policy review aimed to describe any changes in government policy position and the role that non-medical prescribing plays in healthcare provision. The systematic policy review included policy and consultation documents that describe independent non-medical prescribing. A pre-defined protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42015019786). Professional body websites, other relevant websites and the following databases were searched to identify relevant documents: HMIC, Lexis Nexis, UK Government Web Archive, UKOP, UK Parliamentary Papers and Web of Science. Documents published between 2006 and February 2018 were included. Following exclusions, 45 documents were selected for review; 23 relating to policy or strategy and 22 to consultations. Of the former, 13/23 were published 2006-2010 and the remainder since 2013. Two main themes were identified: chronological aspects and healthcare provision. In the former, a publication gap for policy documents resulted from a change in government and associated major healthcare service reorganisation. In the later, the role of non-medical prescribing was found to have evolved to support efficient service delivery, and cost reduction. For many professions, prescribing appears embedded into practice; however, the pharmacy profession continues to produce policy documents, suggesting that prescribing is not yet perceived as normal practice. Prescribing appears to be more easily adopted into practice where it can form part of the overall care of the patient. Where new roles are required to be established, then prescribing takes longer to be universally adopted. While this review concerns policy and practice in the UK, the aspect of role adoption has wider potential implications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31356615
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214630
pii: PONE-D-19-07507
pmc: PMC6663007
doi:
Substances chimiques
Prescription Drugs
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0214630Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2015 Oct-Dec;13(4):640
pubmed: 26759618
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
BMJ. 2005 Nov 5;331(7524):1064-5
pubmed: 16230312
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:6-20
pubmed: 16053580
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 27;11:127
pubmed: 21619565
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100
pubmed: 19621070