A prospective evaluation of clinical and instrumental features before and after ventriculo-peritoneal shunt in patients with idiopathic Normal pressure hydrocephalus: The Bologna PRO-Hydro study.
Clinical practice
Idiopathic Normal pressure hydrocephalus
Movement disorders
Neuropsychological features
Observational prospective study
Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt
Journal
Parkinsonism & related disorders
ISSN: 1873-5126
Titre abrégé: Parkinsonism Relat Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9513583
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
05
01
2019
revised:
14
07
2019
accepted:
15
07
2019
pubmed:
31
7
2019
medline:
1
7
2020
entrez:
31
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a complex and often misdiagnosed syndrome, whose major challenge is to identify which patients will benefit from surgery. Previous studies reported a variability in positive surgery response. The role of tap test(TT) in screening patients suitable for shunting is controversial. The primary aim of this study was to describe the clinical/instrumental features and their longitudinal progression after surgery in iNPH patients. Secondarily, we aimed to investigate the response of the three iNPH domains and the best time of outcome assessment after TT. Patients compatible with iNPH underwent a 3-T-MRI and an inpatients program with TT including standardized clinical evaluations, neuropsychological assessments and instrumental gait analysis pre- and after-(24-h and 72-h) TT. The multidisciplinary team selected candidates for surgery. Patients were evaluated 6- and 12-months after surgery. A total of 154 consecutive patients were included from 2015 to 2018, 76 with an iNPH diagnosis (43 underwent surgery, 35 were evaluated after 6-months). Clinical and instrumented quantitative gait measures and urinary symptoms improved over time along with some neuropsychological functions. Concerning pre- and post-TT analyses, the three iNPH domains showed a different response after TT, the delayed motor assessment was more appropriate than the early one and the instrumental measures highlighted the motor improvement. iNPH patients improved after surgery, when accurately selected. A multidisciplinary team focused on this disease and a standardized protocol helped in achieving a correct diagnosis and management of iNPH. Our results could impact the management of this disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31358442
pii: S1353-8020(19)30311-6
doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.07.021
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
117-124Investigateurs
Raffaele Agati
(R)
Giovanna Calandra-Buonaura
(G)
Sabina Capellari
(S)
Piero Parchi
(P)
Michelangelo Stanzani-Maserati
(M)
Anna Federica Marliani
(AF)
Margherita Merola
(M)
Vito Antonio Piserchia
(VA)
Luisa Sambati
(L)
Carmelo Sturiale
(C)
Antonella Supino
(A)
Monica Nicola
(M)
Tiziana Urli
(T)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.