Large dataset enables prediction of repair after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in primary T cells.
Journal
Nature biotechnology
ISSN: 1546-1696
Titre abrégé: Nat Biotechnol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9604648
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
19
10
2018
accepted:
27
06
2019
pubmed:
31
7
2019
medline:
7
11
2019
entrez:
31
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Understanding of repair outcomes after Cas9-induced DNA cleavage is still limited, especially in primary human cells. We sequence repair outcomes at 1,656 on-target genomic sites in primary human T cells and use these data to train a machine learning model, which we have called CRISPR Repair Outcome (SPROUT). SPROUT accurately predicts the length, probability and sequence of nucleotide insertions and deletions, and will facilitate design of SpCas9 guide RNAs in therapeutically important primary human cells.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31359007
doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0203-2
pii: 10.1038/s41587-019-0203-2
pmc: PMC7388783
mid: NIHMS1577182
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Guide
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1034-1037Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG059307
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U19 AI135990
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : K22 AI136691
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HG008164
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P50 GM082250
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U54 CA209891
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : P50 AI150476
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : DP2 DA042423
Pays : United States
Références
Fischbach, M. A., Bluestone, J. A. & Lim, W. A. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 179ps7 (2013).
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005568
Simeonov, D. et al. Commun. Biol. 2, 70 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0321-x
Hultquist, J. F. et al. Nat. Protoc. 14, 1–27 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41596-018-0069-7
Lindsay, H. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 701–702 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3628
van Overbeek, M. et al. Mol. Cell 63, 633–646 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.037
Brinkman, E. K. et al. Mol. Cell 70, 801–813 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.04.016
Lemos, B. R. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E2040–E2047 (2018).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716855115
Deriano, L. & Roth, D. B. Annu. Rev. Genet. 47, 433–455 (2013).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155540
Shen, M. W. et al. Nature 563, 646–651 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0686-x
Allen, F.et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 64–72 (2019).
Shin, H. Y. et al. Nat. Commun. 8, 15464 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms15464
Kosicki, M., Tomberg, K. & Bradley, A. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 765–771 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/nbt.4192
Roth, T. L. et al. Nature 559, 405–409 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0326-5
Simeonov, D. & Marson, A. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 37, 571–597 (2019).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042718-041522
Untergasser, A. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e115 (2012).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks596
Magoč, T. & Salzberg, S. L. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963 (2011).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324