Understanding context: A concept analysis.
concept analysis
context
health care
implementation
knowledge translation
work organization
Journal
Journal of advanced nursing
ISSN: 1365-2648
Titre abrégé: J Adv Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7609811
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
21
05
2019
revised:
24
06
2019
accepted:
03
07
2019
pubmed:
31
7
2019
medline:
9
6
2020
entrez:
31
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To conduct a concept analysis of clinical practice contexts (work environments) in health care. Context is increasingly recognized as important to the development, delivery, and understanding of implementation strategies; however, conceptual clarity about what comprises context is lacking. Modified Walker and Avant concept analysis comprised of five steps: (1) concept selection; (2) determination of aims; (3) identification of uses of context; (4) determination of its defining attributes; and (5) definition of its empirical referents. A wide range of databases were systematically searched from inception to August 2014. Empirical articles were included if a definition and/or attributes of context were reported. Theoretical articles were included if they reported a model, theory, or framework of context or where context was a component. Double independent screening and data extraction were conducted. Analysis was iterative, involving organizing and reorganizing until a framework of domains, attributes. and features of context emerged. We identified 15,972 references, of which 70 satisfied our inclusion criteria. In total, 201 unique features of context were identified, of these 89 were shared (reported in two or more studies). The 89 shared features were grouped into 21 attributes of context which were further categorized into six domains of context. This study resulted in a framework of domains, attributes and features of context. These attributes and features, if assessed and used to tailor implementation activities, hold promise for improved research implementation in clinical practice. 目标: 对卫生保健的临床实践环境(工作环境)进行概念分析。 背景: 环境对实施战略的制定、实施和理解越来越重要;然而,关于什么组成环境的概念缺乏清晰度。 设计: 改进的Walker和Avant概念分析包括五个步骤:(1)概念选择;(2)目标的确定;(3)识别环境用途;(4)确定定义属性;(5)实证指示物的定义。 方法: 从数据库启用到2014年8月,对大范围的数据库进行系统检索。如果报告了背景的定义和/或属性,那么实证文章就被包括在内。如果理论文章报告了背景的模型、理论或框架或者背景是其中的一个组成部分,那么它们就被包括在内。进行了双独立筛选和数据提取。分析是迭代的,包括组织和重新组织,直到出现一个领域、属性和背景特性的框架。 结果: 我们确定了15972篇参考文献,其中70篇符合我们的纳入标准。总共有201个独特的环境特征被识别出来,其中89个是共享的(在两个或更多的研究中有报道)。89个共享特征被分为21个环境属性,并进一步划分为6个环境领域。 结论: 本研究建立了一个包含环境领域、属性和特征的框架。如果这些属性和特征得到评估并用于定制实施活动,将有望改善临床实践中的研究实施。.
Sections du résumé
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a concept analysis of clinical practice contexts (work environments) in health care.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Context is increasingly recognized as important to the development, delivery, and understanding of implementation strategies; however, conceptual clarity about what comprises context is lacking.
DESIGN
METHODS
Modified Walker and Avant concept analysis comprised of five steps: (1) concept selection; (2) determination of aims; (3) identification of uses of context; (4) determination of its defining attributes; and (5) definition of its empirical referents.
METHODS
METHODS
A wide range of databases were systematically searched from inception to August 2014. Empirical articles were included if a definition and/or attributes of context were reported. Theoretical articles were included if they reported a model, theory, or framework of context or where context was a component. Double independent screening and data extraction were conducted. Analysis was iterative, involving organizing and reorganizing until a framework of domains, attributes. and features of context emerged.
RESULT
RESULTS
We identified 15,972 references, of which 70 satisfied our inclusion criteria. In total, 201 unique features of context were identified, of these 89 were shared (reported in two or more studies). The 89 shared features were grouped into 21 attributes of context which were further categorized into six domains of context.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study resulted in a framework of domains, attributes and features of context. These attributes and features, if assessed and used to tailor implementation activities, hold promise for improved research implementation in clinical practice.
目标: 对卫生保健的临床实践环境(工作环境)进行概念分析。 背景: 环境对实施战略的制定、实施和理解越来越重要;然而,关于什么组成环境的概念缺乏清晰度。 设计: 改进的Walker和Avant概念分析包括五个步骤:(1)概念选择;(2)目标的确定;(3)识别环境用途;(4)确定定义属性;(5)实证指示物的定义。 方法: 从数据库启用到2014年8月,对大范围的数据库进行系统检索。如果报告了背景的定义和/或属性,那么实证文章就被包括在内。如果理论文章报告了背景的模型、理论或框架或者背景是其中的一个组成部分,那么它们就被包括在内。进行了双独立筛选和数据提取。分析是迭代的,包括组织和重新组织,直到出现一个领域、属性和背景特性的框架。 结果: 我们确定了15972篇参考文献,其中70篇符合我们的纳入标准。总共有201个独特的环境特征被识别出来,其中89个是共享的(在两个或更多的研究中有报道)。89个共享特征被分为21个环境属性,并进一步划分为6个环境领域。 结论: 本研究建立了一个包含环境领域、属性和特征的框架。如果这些属性和特征得到评估并用于定制实施活动,将有望改善临床实践中的研究实施。.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(chi)
目标: 对卫生保健的临床实践环境(工作环境)进行概念分析。 背景: 环境对实施战略的制定、实施和理解越来越重要;然而,关于什么组成环境的概念缺乏清晰度。 设计: 改进的Walker和Avant概念分析包括五个步骤:(1)概念选择;(2)目标的确定;(3)识别环境用途;(4)确定定义属性;(5)实证指示物的定义。 方法: 从数据库启用到2014年8月,对大范围的数据库进行系统检索。如果报告了背景的定义和/或属性,那么实证文章就被包括在内。如果理论文章报告了背景的模型、理论或框架或者背景是其中的一个组成部分,那么它们就被包括在内。进行了双独立筛选和数据提取。分析是迭代的,包括组织和重新组织,直到出现一个领域、属性和背景特性的框架。 结果: 我们确定了15972篇参考文献,其中70篇符合我们的纳入标准。总共有201个独特的环境特征被识别出来,其中89个是共享的(在两个或更多的研究中有报道)。89个共享特征被分为21个环境属性,并进一步划分为6个环境领域。 结论: 本研究建立了一个包含环境领域、属性和特征的框架。如果这些属性和特征得到评估并用于定制实施活动,将有望改善临床实践中的研究实施。.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3448-3470Subventions
Organisme : Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Operating Grant-Priority Announcement: Knowledge Translation
ID : 201309KTE-319843-KTR-CECA-169494
Informations de copyright
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Aarons, G. A. (2005). Measuring provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice: Consideration of organizational context and individual differences. Child & Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14, 255-271, viii.
Adams, M., Robert, G., & Maben, J. (2013). 'Catching Up': The Significance of Occupational Communities for the Delivery of High Quality Home Care by Community Nurses. Health: an Interdisciplinary. Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness & Medicine, 17(4), 422-438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459312460703
Adib-Hajbaghery, M. (2007). Factors Facilitating and Inhibiting Evidence-Based Nursing in Iran. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 58(6), 566-575.
Allen, D. (2013). Understanding context for quality improvement: Artefacts, affordances and socio-material infrastructure. Health (United Kingdom), 17(5), 460-477. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459312464072.
Ament, S. M., de Groot, J. J., Maessen, J. M., Dirksen, C. D., van der Weijden, T., & Kleijnen, J. (2015). Sustainability of professionals' adherence to clinical practice guidelines in medical care: A systematic review. British Medical Journal Open, 5, e008073.
Backer, T. E. (1991). Knowledge utilization: The third wave. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 12, 225-240.
Bacon, C. T., Hughes, L. C., & Mark, B. A. (2009). Organizational influences on patient perceptions of symptom management. Research in Nursing & Health, 32(3), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20319
Bahtsevani, C., Willman, A., Khalaf, A., & Ostman, M. (2008). Developing an Instrument for Evaluating Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Test-Retest Study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 14(5), 839-846. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00916.x.
Bajnok, I., Grinspun, D., Lloyd, M., & McConnell, H. (2015). Leading quality improvement through Best Practice Guideline development, implementation, and measurement science. Revista Medunab, 17(3), 155-162.
Bekkema, N., Wiefferink, C., & Mikolajczak, J. (2008). Implementing the Parent Management Training Oregon Model in the Netherlands. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 13(4), 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632750802442136.
Berta, W., Teare, G. F., Gilbart, E., Ginsburg, L. S., Lemieux-Charles, L., Davis, D., & Rappolt, S. (2005). The contingencies of organizational learning in long-term care: Factors that affect innovation adoption. Health Care Management Review, 30(4), 282-292.
Bolin, M., Marklund, S., & Bliese, P. (2008). Organizational impact on psychosocial working conditions. Work, 30(4), 451-459.
Brown, D., & McCormack, B. G. (2011). Developing the Practice Context to Enable More Effective Pain Management with Older People: An Action Research Approach. Implementation Science, 6, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-9.
Brownson, R. C., Fielding, J. E., & Maylahn, C. M. (2009). Evidence-Based Public Health: A Fundamental Concept for Public Health Practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 30, 175-201.
Cane, J., O'Connor, D., & Michie, S. (2012). Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Science, 7(1), 37.
Cobban, S. J., & Profetto-McGrath, J. (2011). Dental Hygienists' Research Utilization: Influence of Context and Attitudes. International Journal of Dental Hygiene, 9(3), 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2010.00484.x.
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice. A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 50.
Dogherty, E. J., Harrison, M. B., & Graham, I. D. (2010). Facilitation as a role and process in achieving evidence-based practice in nursing: A focused review of concept and meaning. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 7(2), 76-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6787.2010.00186.x
Dopson, S., & Fitzgerald, L. (2005). Knowledge to Action?: Evidence-Based Health Care in Context. New York, NY: OUP Oxford.
Estabrooks, C. A., Squires, J. E., Cummings, G. G., Birdsell, J. M., & Norton, P. G. (2009). Development and assessment of the Alberta Context Tool. BMC Health Services Research, 9, 234. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-234
Estabrooks, C. A., Squires, J. E., Hutchinson, A. M., Scott, S., Cummings, G. G., Kang, S. H., … Stevens, B. (2011). Assessment of variation in the Alberta Context Tool: The contribution of unit level contextual factors and specialty in Canadian pediatric acute care settings. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 251. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-251
Fixsen, D. L., Naoorn, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: National Implementation Research Network.
Fleuren, M. A., Paulussen, T. G., Van Dommelen, P., & Van Buuren, S. (2014). Towards a measurement instrument for determinants of innovations. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 26(5), 501-510.
French, B. (2005). Contextual factors influencing research use in nursing. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 2(4), 172-183.
Glaser, E. M., Abelson, H. H., & Garrison, K. N. (1983). Putting knowledge to use: Facilitating the diffusion of knowledge and the implementation of planned change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Glasgow, R. E. (1995). A practical model of diabetes management and education. Diabetes Care, 18(1), 117-126.
Glisson, C. (2002). The organizational context of children's mental health services. Clinical Child & Family Psychology Review, 5(4), 233-253.
Glisson, C., Landsverk, J., Schoenwald, S., Kelleher, K., Hoagwood, K. E., Mayberg, S., … Health, R. N. o. Y. M. (2008). Assessing the Organizational Social Context (Osc) of Mental Health Services: Implications for Research and Practice. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35(1-2), 98-113.
Graham, I. D., & Logan, J. (2004). Innovations in Knowledge Transfer and Continuity of Care. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 36(2), 89-103.
Greenhalgh, T., & Peacock, R. (2005). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: Audit of primary sources. British Medical Journal, 331, 1064-1065.
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., & Bate, P. (2004a). How to spread good ideas: A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability of innovations in health service delivery and organisation. New York, NY: National Coordinating Centre for the Service Delivery and Organisation (NCCSDO).
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004b). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581-629.
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004c). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581-629.
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004d). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Millbank Q, 82(4), 581-629.
Grol, R., & Grimshaw, J. (2003). From Best Evidence to Best Practice: Effective Implementation of Change in Patients' Care. Lancet, 362(9391), 1225-1230.
Gruen, R. L., Elliott, J. H., Nolan, M. L., Lawton, P. D., Parkhill, A., McLaren, C. J., & Lavis, J. N. (2008). Sustainability science: An integrated approach for health-programme planning. Lancet, 372(9649), 1579-1589.
Helfrich, C. D., Li, Y. F., Sharp, N. D., & Sales, A. E. (2009). Organizational readiness to change assessment (ORCA): Development of an instrument based on the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (PARIHS) framework. Implementation Science, 4, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-38
Hutchinson, A. M., Mallidou, A. A., Toth, F., Cummings, G. G., Schalm, C., & Estabrooks, C. A. (2010). Review and synthesis of literature examining characteristics of organizational context that influence knowledge translation in healthcare: Technical report. Alberta: University of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing.
Jinnett, K., & Alexander, J. A. (1999). The Influence of Organizational Context on Quitting Intention: An Examination of Treatment Staff in Long-Term Mental Health Care Settings. Research on Aging, 21(2), 176-204.
Kaplan, H. C., Brady, P. W., Dritz, M. C., Hooper, D. K., Linam, W., Froehle, C. M., & Margolis, P. (2010). The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: A systematic review of the literature. The Milbank Quarterly, 88(4), 500-559.
Kimberly, J. (1981). Managerial innovation. In P. Nystrom (Ed.), Handbook of organizational design (pp. 84-104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kimberly, J., & Cook, J. M. (2008). Organizational measurement and the implementation of innovations in mental health services. Administration & Policy in Mental Health, 35(1-2), 11-20.
Kitson, A., Harvey, G., & McCormack, B. (1998a). Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: A conceptual framework. Quality in Health Care, 7(3), 149-158.
Kitson, A., Harvey, G., & McCormack, B. (1998b). Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: A conceptual framework. Qual Health Care, 7(3), 149-158.
Kitson, A. L., Rycroft-Malone, J., Harvey, G., McCormack, B., Seers, K., & Titchen, A. (2008). Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: Theoretical and practical challenges. Implementation Science, 3, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-1
Kochevar, L. K., & Yano, E. M. (2006). Understanding health care organization needs and context: Beyond performance gaps. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(Suppl 2), S25-S29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00359.x
Lambert, S. M., Debattista, J., Bodiroza, A., Martin, J., Staunton, S., & Walker, R. (2013). Effective Peer Education in Hiv: Defining Factors That Maximise Success. Sexual Health, 10(4), 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH12195.
Landry, R., Amara, N., & Lamari, M. (2001). Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Research Policy, 30, 333-349.
Latimer, M. A., Ritchie, J. A., & Johnston, C. C. (2010). Individual Nurse and Organizational Context Considerations for Better Knowledge Use in Pain Care. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 25(4), 274-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2009.03.004.
May, C., Finch, T., Mair, F., Ballini, L., Dowrick, C., Eccles, M., … Heaven, B. (2007). Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: The normalization process model. BMC Health Services Research, 7, 148.
McCormack, B., Kitson, A., Harvey, G., Rycroft-Malone, J., Titchen, A., & Seers, K. (2002). Getting evidence into practice: The meaning of ‘context'. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 38, 94-104.
McCormack, B., McCarthy, G., Wright, J., & Coffey, A. (2009). Development and testing of the Context Assessment Index (CAI). Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 6(1), 27-35.
McGlynn, E. A., Asch, S. M., Adams, J., Keesey, J., Hicks, J., DeCristofaro, A., & Kerr, E. A. (2003). The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(26), 2635-2645.
Meijers, J. M., Janssen, M. A., Cummings, G. G., Wallin, L., Estabrooks, C. A., & Halfens, R. (2006). Assessing the relationships between contextual factors and research utilization in nursing: Systematic literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(5), 622-635.
Michie, S., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Lawton, R., Parker, D., & Walker, A. (2005). Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: A consensus approach. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 14(1), 26-33.
Mitton, C., Adair, C. E., McKenzie, E., Patten, S. B., & Perry, B. W. (2007). Knowledge transfer and exchange: Review and synthesis of the literature. The Milbank Quarterly, 85(4), 729-768.
Ovretveit, J. (2004). Change Achievement Success Indicators (Casi): Stockholm. Sweden: Karolinska Institute Medical Management.
Oxman, A., & Flottorp, S. (2001). An overview of strategies to promote implementation of evidence-based health care. In C. Silagy, & A. Haines (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in primary care (2nd ed., pp. 101-119). London: BMJ Books. (Reprinted from: In File).
Pettigrew, A., Ferlie, E., & McKee, L. (1992). Shaping Strategic Change: Making Change in Large Organizations. London, UK: Sage.
Pettigrew, A., & Whipp, R. (1992). Managing Change and Corporate Performance. In K. Cool, D. Neven, & I. Walter (Eds.), European Industrial Restructuring in the 1990s (pp. 227-265). New York, NY: New York University Press.
Pfadenhauer, L. M., Mozygemba, K., Gerhardus, A., Hofmann, B., Booth, A., Lysdahl, K. B., … Rehfuess, E. A. (2015). Context and implementation: A concept analysis towards conceptual maturity. Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen, 109(2), 103-114.
Rich, R., & Oh, C. (1994). The utilization of policy research. In S. Nagel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of policy studies (Vol. 2, pp. 69-92). New York, NY: M. Dekker. (Reprinted from: Not in File).
Scheirer, M. A. (2005). Is sustainability possible? A review and commentary on empirical studies of program sustainability. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(3), 320-347.
Simpson, D. D., & Dansereau, D. F. (2007). Assessing organizational functioning as a step toward innovation. Science & Practice Perspectives, 3(2), 20-28.
Solberg, L. I., Brekke, M. L., Fazio, C. J., Fowles, J., Jacobsen, D. N., Kottke, T. E., … Rolnick, S. J. (2000). Lessons from Experienced Guideline Implementers: Attend to Many Factors and Use Multiple Strategies. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 26(4), 171-188.
Squires, J. E., Estabrooks, C. A., O'Rourke, H. M., Gustavsson, P., Newburn-Cook, C. V., & Wallin, L. (2011). A systematic review of the psychometric properties of self-report research utilization measures used in healthcare. Implementation Science, 6, 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-83
Squires, J. E., Estabrooks, C. A., Scott, S. D., Cummings, G. G., Hayduk, L., Kang, S. H., & Stevens, B. (2013). The influence of organizational context on the use of research by nurses in Canadian pediatric hospitals. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 351.
Squires, J. E., Graham, I. D., Hutchinson, A. M., Linklater, S., Brehaut, J. C., Curran, J., … Sales, A. E. (2015). Understanding context in knowledge translation: a concept analysis study protocol. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(5), 1146-1155.
Squires, J. E., Sullivan, K., Eccles, M. P., Worswick, J., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2014). Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews. Implementation Science, 9, 152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0152-6
Stetler, C. B., Damschroder, L. J., Helfrich, C. D., & Hagedorn, H. J. (2011). A guide for applying a revised version of the PARIHS framework for implementation. Implementation Science, 6, 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-99
Tricco, A. C., Ashoor, H. M., Cardoso, R., MacDonald, H., Cogo, E., Kastner, M., … Straus, S. E. (2015). Sustainability of knowledge translation interventions in healthcare decision-making: A scoping review. Implementation Science, 11(1), 55.
Varcoe, C., & Hilton, A. (1995). Factors Affecting Acute-Care Nurses' Use of Research Findings. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 27(4), 51-71.
Versteeg, M. H., Laurant, M. G., Franx, G. C., Jacobs, A. J., & Wensing, M. J. (2012). Factors Associated with the Impact of Quality Improvement Collaboratives in Mental Healthcare: An Exploratory Study. Implementation Science, 7, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-1.
Walker, L. O., & Avant, K. C. (2005). Strategies for theory construction in nursing (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Walker, L. O., & Avant, K. C. (2011). Strategies for theory construction in nursing (5th ed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
Wallin, L., Estabrooks, C. A., Midodzi, W. K., & Cummings, G. G. (2006). Development and Validation of a Derived Measure of Research Utilization by Nurses. Nursing Research, 55(3), 149-160.
Wallin, L., Ewald, U., Wikblad, K., Scott-Findlay, S., & Arnetz, B. B. (2006). Understanding work contextual factors: A short-cut to evidence-based practice? Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 3(4), 153-164.
Wilson, M., Lavis, J., & Grimshaw, J. (2012). Supporting the use of research evidence in the Canadian health sector. Healthcare Quarterly, 15, 58-62.
Wiltsey Stirman, S., Kimberly, J., Cook, N., Calloway, A., Castro, F., & Charns, M. (2012). The sustainability of new programs and innovations: A review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implementation Science, 7, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-17
Windle, G. (2011). What is resilience? A review and concept analysis. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 21(2), 152-169.
World Health Organization. (2017). World report on health policy and systems research. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Xyrichis, A., & Ream, E. (2008). Teamwork: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 61(2), 232-241.
Yost, J., Thompson, D., Ganann, R., Aloweni, F., Newman, K., McKibbon, A., … Ciliska, D. (2014). Knowledge translation strategies for enhancing nurses' evidence-informed decision making: A scoping review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11(3), 156-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12043
Zapka, J., Simpson, K., Hiott, L., Langston, L., Fakhry, S., & Ford, D. (2013). A Mixed Methods Descriptive Investigation of Readiness to Change in Rural Hospitals Participating in a Tele-Critical Care Intervention. BMC Health Services Research, 13, 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-33