Do early luteal serum progesterone levels predict the reproductive outcomes in IVF with oral dydrogesterone for luteal phase support?
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
26
05
2019
accepted:
16
07
2019
entrez:
31
7
2019
pubmed:
31
7
2019
medline:
11
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We sought to determine whether the early luteal serum progesterone (P4) level predicts the success of IVF treatment with oral dydrogesterone for luteal support. This retrospective monocentric cohort study included 242 women who underwent IVF treatment with fresh embryo transfer (ET) between July 2017 and June 2018. The population was unselected, and women were treated according to our unit's usual stimulation protocols. For the luteal phase support (LPS), all women were supplemented with a 10 mg three-times-daily dose of oral dydrogesterone beginning on the day of oocyte pick-up (OPU). Blood sampling was performed on the day of ET (Day 2-3 after OPU) to determine the early luteal serum progesterone level. ROC curve analysis allowed us to determine two thresholds for the prediction of live birth using the early P4 level. Women who had early luteal P4 levels greater than 252 nmol/l had a significantly higher live birth rate (27.1%) than women with early luteal P4 between 115 and 252 nmol/l (17.2%) and women with early luteal P4 below 115 nmol/l (6.0%; p = 0.011). After a multiple regression analysis, an early luteal P4 level greater than 252 nmol/l was still associated with a higher chance of a live birth than a P4 between 115 and 252 nmol/l (OR = 0.40 [0.18-0.91]; p = 0.028) or a P4 below 115 nmol/l (OR = 0.10 [0.01-0.52]; p = 0.006). Our study suggests a positive association between early P4 levels and reproductive outcomes in IVF using oral dydrogesterone for luteal support. The inconsistencies between our results and those of other studies suggest that extrapolation is impractical. Further larger prospective cohort studies should be conducted to determine reliable thresholds that could be used to personalize luteal phase support.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31361764
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220450
pii: PONE-D-19-14891
pmc: PMC6667136
doi:
Substances chimiques
Progesterone
4G7DS2Q64Y
Dydrogesterone
90I02KLE8K
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.8187413']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0220450Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb 1;33(2):229-237
pubmed: 29300975
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005 Dec;97(5):416-20
pubmed: 16213136
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2007 Oct;23 Suppl 1:68-72
pubmed: 17943542
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 07;(7):CD009154
pubmed: 26148507
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Mar;186:49-53
pubmed: 25622239
Hum Reprod. 2017 May 1;32(5):1019-1027
pubmed: 28333318
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017 Jan 10;15(1):6
pubmed: 28069012
Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Feb;38(2):249-259
pubmed: 30595525
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Aug;31(2):180-91
pubmed: 26099447
Hum Reprod. 2018 Dec 1;33(12):2312-2313
pubmed: 30325399
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Nov;37(5):641-647
pubmed: 30385142
Hum Reprod. 2018 Aug 1;33(8):1506-1516
pubmed: 29955789
Fertil Steril. 1998 Jan;69(1):96-101
pubmed: 9457941
Fertil Steril. 2018 Jun;109(6):968-979
pubmed: 29935655
Hum Reprod. 2017 Dec 1;32(12):2437-2442
pubmed: 29040638
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Jun;36(6):630-645
pubmed: 29550390
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Feb;87(2):709-15
pubmed: 11836309
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Jun 1;86(11):829-35
pubmed: 8182763
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012 Jun 24;357(1-2):108-18
pubmed: 22115959
Fertil Steril. 2018 May;109(5):756-762
pubmed: 29778368
Fertil Steril. 2017 Sep;108(3):505-512.e2
pubmed: 28697910
Fertil Steril. 2011 May;95(6):1961-5
pubmed: 21333984
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(3):213-7
pubmed: 26486011
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Mar;95(3):403-6
pubmed: 10711552
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Nov;99(11):4241-9
pubmed: 24606090
Mol Hum Reprod. 2002 Sep;8(9):871-9
pubmed: 12200466
Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 May;28(5):552-9
pubmed: 24656557