Recognition: key to the entrepreneurial strategies of rural coalitions in advancing access to health care.
Aged
Community Networks
/ organization & administration
Female
Focus Groups
Health Services Accessibility
/ organization & administration
Health Services Needs and Demand
/ statistics & numerical data
Health Status Disparities
Healthcare Disparities
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Minority Health
Rural Health Services
/ organization & administration
Rural Population
/ statistics & numerical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
Journal
International journal for equity in health
ISSN: 1475-9276
Titre abrégé: Int J Equity Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147692
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 07 2019
30 07 2019
Historique:
received:
11
03
2019
accepted:
21
07
2019
entrez:
1
8
2019
pubmed:
1
8
2019
medline:
26
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Considerable evidence has advanced the role of citizen-led coalitions (CLC) in supporting the health and social needs of rural citizens. There has been little research focusing on the experiences and strategies of coalitions, with their limited resources and status, in targeting health inequities in their rural communities. The aim of this study was to understand the entrepreneurial strategies and experiences of rural coalitions to effect change in the delivery of health services for their older adult populations. A qualitative descriptive study method was used to generate understanding of the entrepreneurial experiences and strategies of CLCs in advancing health services to meet the health and social needs of their citizens. Seven diverse CLCs (n = 40) from different rural communities participated in focus groups and in individual and coalition-level surveys. Thematic analysis was used to construct themes from the data. Two over-riding themes emerged: entrepreneurial strategies and societal recognition. CLCs engaged in numerous entrepreneurial strategies that enabled actions and outcomes in meeting their health care needs. These strategies included: securing quick wins, leveraging existing resources, and joining forces with stakeholder groups/individuals. However, despite these strategies and successes, coalitions expressed frustration with not being seen and not being heard by decision-makers. This pointed to a key structural barrier to coalition successes -- a broader societal and institutional problem of failing to recognize not only the health needs of rural citizens, but also the legitimacy of the community coalitions to represent and act on those needs. Despite the potential for coalitions to mobilize and effect change in addressing the inequities of rural health service access for older adults, broader barriers to their recognition, may undermine their entrepreneurial strategies and success.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31362732
doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1021-3
pii: 10.1186/s12939-019-1021-3
pmc: PMC6668106
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
119Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : CIHR PCS 146401
Pays : Canada
Références
J Rural Health. 2018 Feb;34 Suppl 1:s48-s55
pubmed: 28295584
Popul Health Manag. 2013 Aug;16(4):246-54
pubmed: 23537155
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Apr;30(4):351-61
pubmed: 16530624
Health Educ Res. 1993 Sep;8(3):315-30
pubmed: 10146473
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2011;70(5):460-72
pubmed: 22030009
Res Nurs Health. 2010 Feb;33(1):77-84
pubmed: 20014004
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Feb 21;16(1):17
pubmed: 28219386
Healthc Policy. 2013 Feb;8(3):10-6
pubmed: 23968623
J Rural Health. 2016 Winter;32(1):35-43
pubmed: 26171848
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Jan-Mar;9(1):1142
pubmed: 19298094
Health Educ Res. 2012 Aug;27(4):572-84
pubmed: 21911845
Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2011 Fall;31 Suppl 1:1-36
pubmed: 22047772
Int J Equity Health. 2012 May 25;11:28
pubmed: 22632097
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan 31;11:20
pubmed: 21281470