Safety and effectiveness of upadacitinib or adalimumab plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 48 weeks with switch to alternate therapy in patients with insufficient response.
Adalimumab
/ administration & dosage
Adult
Antirheumatic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
/ diagnostic imaging
Disease Progression
Double-Blind Method
Drug Substitution
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Male
Methotrexate
/ administration & dosage
Middle Aged
Radiography
Treatment Outcome
dmards (biologic)
dmards (synthetic)
methotrexate
rheumatoid arthritis
Journal
Annals of the rheumatic diseases
ISSN: 1468-2060
Titre abrégé: Ann Rheum Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2019
11 2019
Historique:
received:
22
05
2019
revised:
13
07
2019
accepted:
15
07
2019
pubmed:
1
8
2019
medline:
11
4
2020
entrez:
1
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In SELECT-COMPARE, a randomised double-blind study, upadacitinib 15 mg once daily was superior to placebo or adalimumab on background methotrexate (MTX) for treating rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms and inhibited radiographical progression versus placebo at 26 weeks. Here we report 48-week safety and efficacy in patients who continued their original medication or were rescued to the alternative medication for insufficient response. Patients on MTX received upadacitinib 15 mg, placebo or adalimumab for 48 weeks. Rescue without washout, from placebo or adalimumab to upadacitinib or upadacitinib to adalimumab occurred if patients had <20% improvement in tender joint count (TJC) or swollen joint count (SJC) (weeks 14/18/22) or Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) >10 (week 26); remaining placebo patients were switched to upadacitinib at week 26. Efficacy was analysed by randomised group (non-responder imputation), as well as separately for rescued patients (as observed). Treatment-emergent adverse events per 100 patient-years were summarised. Consistent with responses through week 26, from weeks 26 to 48, responses by randomised group including low disease activity, clinical remission and improvements in pain and function remained superior for upadacitinib versus adalimumab; radiographical progression remained lower for upadacitinib versus placebo (linear extrapolation). Although both switch groups responded, a higher proportion of patients rescued to upadacitinib from adalimumab achieved CDAI ≤10 at 6 months postswitch versus patients rescued from upadacitinib to adalimumab. Safety at week 48 was comparable to week 26. Upadacitinib+MTX demonstrated superior clinical and functional responses versus adalimumab+MTX and maintained inhibition of structural damage versus placebo+MTX through week 48. Patients with an insufficient response to adalimumab or upadacitinib safely achieved clinically meaningful responses after switching to the alternative medication without washout.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In SELECT-COMPARE, a randomised double-blind study, upadacitinib 15 mg once daily was superior to placebo or adalimumab on background methotrexate (MTX) for treating rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms and inhibited radiographical progression versus placebo at 26 weeks. Here we report 48-week safety and efficacy in patients who continued their original medication or were rescued to the alternative medication for insufficient response.
METHODS
Patients on MTX received upadacitinib 15 mg, placebo or adalimumab for 48 weeks. Rescue without washout, from placebo or adalimumab to upadacitinib or upadacitinib to adalimumab occurred if patients had <20% improvement in tender joint count (TJC) or swollen joint count (SJC) (weeks 14/18/22) or Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) >10 (week 26); remaining placebo patients were switched to upadacitinib at week 26. Efficacy was analysed by randomised group (non-responder imputation), as well as separately for rescued patients (as observed). Treatment-emergent adverse events per 100 patient-years were summarised.
RESULTS
Consistent with responses through week 26, from weeks 26 to 48, responses by randomised group including low disease activity, clinical remission and improvements in pain and function remained superior for upadacitinib versus adalimumab; radiographical progression remained lower for upadacitinib versus placebo (linear extrapolation). Although both switch groups responded, a higher proportion of patients rescued to upadacitinib from adalimumab achieved CDAI ≤10 at 6 months postswitch versus patients rescued from upadacitinib to adalimumab. Safety at week 48 was comparable to week 26.
CONCLUSION
Upadacitinib+MTX demonstrated superior clinical and functional responses versus adalimumab+MTX and maintained inhibition of structural damage versus placebo+MTX through week 48. Patients with an insufficient response to adalimumab or upadacitinib safely achieved clinically meaningful responses after switching to the alternative medication without washout.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31362993
pii: annrheumdis-2019-215764
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215764
pmc: PMC6837258
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
0
upadacitinib
4RA0KN46E0
Adalimumab
FYS6T7F842
Methotrexate
YL5FZ2Y5U1
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02629159']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1454-1462Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: RF has received research grants and consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer. MG has served as a consultant for, and has received grants from, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Galapagos, and Gilead. EM has received research grants and consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, BMS, and Sandoz. LB has served as a speaker on behalf of, and received consulting fees and research grants from, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Roche, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Sanofi, Eli Lilly and Novartis. CP is an employee and shareholder of Spire Sciences, has served as a speaker on behalf of Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb and has served as a consultant for Centrexion, Crescendo Bioscience, Daiichi Sankyo, EMD Serono, Five Prime, Flexion Therapeutics, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Plexikkon, Regeneron, Roche and SetPoint. PD has received speaker fees from BMS, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, and Celltrion. AO has served as a speaker on behalf of, and has received consulting fees and/or research grants from BMS, Janssen, Roche, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Sanofi, Eli Lilly and Novartis. JVE, YL, and I-HS are employees of AbbVie and may own stock or stock options.
Références
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):3-15
pubmed: 25969430
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Oct;73(10):1774-80
pubmed: 23926057
Lancet. 2008 Mar 22;371(9617):987-97
pubmed: 18358926
Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2503-2512
pubmed: 29908669
Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2513-2524
pubmed: 29908670
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):652-662
pubmed: 28199814
Arthritis Rheum. 1992 Jan;35(1):26-34
pubmed: 1731813
J Rheumatol. 1999 Mar;26(3):743-5
pubmed: 10090194
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Nov;71(11):1788-1800
pubmed: 31287230
Lancet. 2004 Jul 17-23;364(9430):263-9
pubmed: 15262104
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):960-977
pubmed: 28264816
Lancet. 2019 Jun 8;393(10188):2303-2311
pubmed: 31130260
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Oct;65(10):1600-7
pubmed: 23666917
J Rheumatol. 2007 Jun;34(6):1401-14
pubmed: 17552067
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):1-26
pubmed: 26545940
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Jun 23;18:145
pubmed: 27334658
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Oct;66(10):2675-84
pubmed: 24943354
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Mar;65(3):559-70
pubmed: 23348607
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 31;374(13):1243-52
pubmed: 27028914
Clin Rheumatol. 2018 May;37(5):1189-1197
pubmed: 29388086