Proximal Splenorenal Shunt in a Rare Renal Vein Anomaly: A Case Report.

left renal vein anomaly ncph proximal splenorenal shunt

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 May 2019
Historique:
entrez: 1 8 2019
pubmed: 1 8 2019
medline: 1 8 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Left renal vein (LRV) has been considered as the most suitable vein for proximal splenorenal shunt (PSRS), a commonly performed shunt for non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. Anatomical anomalies in LRV that can pose technical difficulty during shunt procedure are reported in 10% cases. We report a rare anomaly of LRV which precluded performance of standard end-to-side proximal splenorenal shunt and describe its management by performing an interposition end-to-end proximal splenorenal shunt. A 50-year-old female presented with recurrent episodes of upper gastrointestinal bleed for five years. She was pale and had a massive splenomegaly. There were no signs of encephalopathy. Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy revealed three columns of grade 3 esophageal varices, large fundal varices and mild portal hypertensive gastropathy. Duplex ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the abdomen was suggestive of non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis. She underwent an interposition end-to-end proximal splenorenal shunt with inferior branch of left renal vein. She developed partial shunt thrombosis at follow-up of 18 months and underwent balloon angioplasty and metallic stenting of shunt. She is doing well at 24 months follow-up with no recurrence of symptoms and a patent shunt. In conclusion, the presence of renal vein abnormalities does not preclude performance of PSRS with suitable modifications. A high index of suspicion is required to detect them preoperatively to avoid technical difficulties and to plan modifications of PSRS. Interposition end-to-end graft proximal splenorenal shunt is a valid option with good primary-assisted patency rate and clinical outcome.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31363436
doi: 10.7759/cureus.4754
pmc: PMC6663117
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

e4754

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Am J Surg. 1975 May;129(5):503-5
pubmed: 1079408
Anat Cell Biol. 2012 Mar;45(1):57-61
pubmed: 22536553
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2014;55(1):77-81
pubmed: 24715169
BMC Surg. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):65
pubmed: 28576121
Ann Surg. 1994 Feb;219(2):193-6
pubmed: 8129490

Auteurs

Pottakkat Biju (P)

Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, IND.

Karan Midha (K)

Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, IND.

Shahana Gupta (S)

Surgical Gastroenterology, Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata, IND.

Raja Kalayarasan (R)

Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, IND.

Senthil Gnanasekaran (S)

Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, IND.

Classifications MeSH