Patients with laboratory evidence of West Nile virus disease without reported fever.
Asymptomatic Diseases
/ epidemiology
California
/ epidemiology
Clinical Laboratory Techniques
/ methods
Female
Fever
/ diagnosis
Humans
Incidence
Louisiana
/ epidemiology
Male
Massachusetts
/ epidemiology
Minnesota
/ epidemiology
Population Surveillance
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
West Nile Fever
/ diagnosis
West Nile virus
/ isolation & purification
Arboviruses
West Nile virus
epidemiology
Journal
Epidemiology and infection
ISSN: 1469-4409
Titre abrégé: Epidemiol Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8703737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
entrez:
1
8
2019
pubmed:
1
8
2019
medline:
3
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In 2013, the national surveillance case definition for West Nile virus (WNV) disease was revised to remove fever as a criterion for neuroinvasive disease and require at most subjective fever for non-neuroinvasive disease. The aims of this project were to determine how often afebrile WNV disease occurs and assess differences among patients with and without fever. We included cases with laboratory evidence of WNV disease reported from four states in 2014. We compared demographics, clinical symptoms and laboratory evidence for patients with and without fever and stratified the analysis by neuroinvasive and non-neuroinvasive presentations. Among 956 included patients, 39 (4%) had no fever; this proportion was similar among patients with and without neuroinvasive disease symptoms. For neuroinvasive and non-neuroinvasive patients, there were no differences in age, sex, or laboratory evidence between febrile and afebrile patients, but hospitalisations were more common among patients with fever (P < 0.01). The only significant difference in symptoms was for ataxia, which was more common in neuroinvasive patients without fever (P = 0.04). Only 5% of non-neuroinvasive patients did not meet the WNV case definition due to lack of fever. The evidence presented here supports the changes made to the national case definition in 2013.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31364561
pii: S0950268819001079
doi: 10.1017/S0950268819001079
pmc: PMC6624872
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e219Références
N Engl J Med. 2001 Jun 14;344(24):1807-14
pubmed: 11407341
Lancet. 2001 Jul 28;358(9278):261-4
pubmed: 11498211
Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Mar;9(3):376-9
pubmed: 12643836
Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Jul;9(7):788-93
pubmed: 12890318
Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Aug;11(8):1174-9
pubmed: 16102303
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Jul;12(7):1129-31
pubmed: 16836833
Rev Med Virol. 2006 Jul-Aug;16(4):209-24
pubmed: 16906589
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Dec;13(12):1918-20
pubmed: 18258047
J Infect Dis. 2010 Nov 1;202(9):1354-61
pubmed: 20874087
JAMA. 2013 Jul 17;310(3):308-15
pubmed: 23860989
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Feb;78(2):132-6
pubmed: 24316017
Viruses. 2014 Feb 06;6(2):606-23
pubmed: 24509812