Effect of Enhanced Medical Rehabilitation on Functional Recovery in Older Adults Receiving Skilled Nursing Care After Acute Rehabilitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 07 2019
03 07 2019
Historique:
entrez:
1
8
2019
pubmed:
1
8
2019
medline:
12
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Enhanced medical rehabilitation (EMR) is a systematic and standardized approach for physical and occupational therapists to engage patients. Higher patient engagement in therapy might lead to improved functional recovery in rehabilitation settings, such as skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). To determine whether EMR improves older adults' functional recovery. A double-blind, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 29, 2014, to July 13, 2018, in 229 adults aged 65 years or older admitted to 2 US SNFs. Participants were randomized to receive EMR (n = 114) vs standard-of-care rehabilitation (n = 115). Intention-to-treat analysis was used. The intervention group received their physical and occupational therapy from therapists trained in EMR. Based on models of motivation and behavior change, EMR is a toolkit of techniques to increase patient engagement and therapy intensity. The control group received standard-of-care rehabilitation from physical and occupational therapists not trained in EMR. The primary outcome was change in function in activities of daily living and mobility, as assessed with the Barthel Index, which measures 10 basic activities of daily living or mobility items (scale range, 0-100), from SNF admission to discharge; secondary outcomes were gait speed for 10 m, 6-minute walk test, discharge disposition, rehospitalizations, and self-reported functional status at days 30, 60, and 90. To examine the rehabilitation process, therapists' engagement with patients and patient active time during therapy were measured for a sample of the sessions. Of the 229 participants, 149 (65.1%) were women; 177 (77.3%) were white, and 51 (22.3%) were black; mean (SD) age was 79.3 (8.0) years. Participants assigned to EMR showed greater recovery of function than those assigned to standard of care (mean increase in Barthel Index score, 35 points; 95% CI, 31.6-38.3 vs 28 points; 95% CI, 25.2-31.7 points; P = .007). There was no evidence of a difference in the length of stay (mean [SD], 23.5 [13.1] days). However, there were no group by time differences in secondary outcome measures, including self-reported function after SNF discharge out to 90 days as measured on the Barthel Index (mean [SE] score: EMR, 83.65 [2.20]; standard of care, 84.67 [2.16]; P = .96). The EMR therapists used a median (interquartile range) of 24.4 (21.0-37.3) motivational messages per therapy session vs 2.3 (1.1-2.9) for nontrained therapists (P < .001), and EMR patients were active during a mean (SD) of 52.5 (6.6%) of the therapy session time vs 41.2 (6.8%) for nontrained therapists (P = .001). Enhanced medical rehabilitation modestly improved short-term functional recovery for selected older adults rehabilitating in SNFs. However, there was no evidence that the benefits persisted over the longer term. This study demonstrates the value of engaging and motivating older adults in rehabilitation therapy, but more work is needed to extend these benefits to longer-term outcomes after discharge home. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02114879.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31365113
pii: 2740071
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8199
pmc: PMC6669784
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02114879']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e198199Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH099011
Pays : United States
Références
Am J Health Promot. 1997 Sep-Oct;12(1):38-48
pubmed: 10170434
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Jul;5(3):133-9
pubmed: 11183623
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Oct;83(10):1378-83
pubmed: 12370872
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Nov;83(11):1514-23
pubmed: 12422318
Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Aug;97(1):68-70
pubmed: 14604023
Stroke. 2004 Apr;35(4):1005-9
pubmed: 14988574
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Mar;85(3):380-4
pubmed: 15031821
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Mar;86(3):373-9
pubmed: 15759214
Psychiatry Res. 1992 Mar;41(3):237-48
pubmed: 1594710
J Pers. 2006 Dec;74(6):1721-47
pubmed: 17083664
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 Mar-Apr;29(2):141-6
pubmed: 17336663
Stroke. 2007 Jul;38(7):2096-100
pubmed: 17510461
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jul;88(7):877-84
pubmed: 17601468
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Apr;90(4):618-22
pubmed: 19345777
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Oct;90(10):1692-8
pubmed: 19801058
Stroke. 2010 Jan;41(1):129-35
pubmed: 19910547
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):57-64
pubmed: 20048361
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Feb;91(2):203-7
pubmed: 20159122
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 May;89(5):415-22
pubmed: 20407308
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Dec;58(12):2345-9
pubmed: 21070194
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Feb;92(2):176-83
pubmed: 21272712
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Jul;59(7):1320-5
pubmed: 21668916
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Aug;91(8):715-24
pubmed: 22377824
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Oct;13(8):708-12
pubmed: 22863663
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990 Feb;38(2):129-35
pubmed: 2299116
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;21(3):307
pubmed: 23395198
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 May;32(5):864-72
pubmed: 23650319
Health Econ. 2014 Jul;23(7):821-40
pubmed: 23775721
JAMA. 2014 Feb 19;311(7):700-8
pubmed: 24549550
Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2014 Jun;32(2):169-178
pubmed: 25419032
J Evid Inf Soc Work. 2015;12(3):261-71
pubmed: 25661896
Clin Rehabil. 2016 Aug;30(8):776-85
pubmed: 26337626
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Oct;175(10):1722
pubmed: 26436745
NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Oct 14;39(4):481-498
pubmed: 27689608
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 May 1;18(5):383-387
pubmed: 27939318
JAMA. 2016 Dec 20;316(23):2487-2488
pubmed: 27997661
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Feb;15(2):454-485
pubmed: 28178023
JAMA. 2017 Mar 14;317(10):1037-1046
pubmed: 28291891
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jun 1;18(6):539-543
pubmed: 28431908
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019 Jul/Sep;42(3):189-195
pubmed: 28650398
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jan;99(1):107-115
pubmed: 28860096
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jun;99(6):1124-1140.e9
pubmed: 28965738
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Apr;19(4):348-354.e4
pubmed: 29371127
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Mar 12;18(1):71
pubmed: 29530014
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018 Jul;24(6):572-583
pubmed: 29552996
PLoS Med. 2018 Jun 26;15(6):e1002592
pubmed: 29944655
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Oct;19(10):864-870
pubmed: 30056009
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jan;67(1):11-16
pubmed: 30276809
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Apr;67(4):638-640
pubmed: 30707762
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979 Jan;60(1):14-7
pubmed: 420565
Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9
pubmed: 444788
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061
Clin Rehabil. 1997 Nov;11(4):335-7
pubmed: 9408675
Stroke. 1998 Oct;29(10):2055-60
pubmed: 9756581