Native ureteroureterostomy in renal allograft recipient surgery: A single-center 5-year experience.
Journal
Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
ISSN: 0970-1591
Titre abrégé: Indian J Urol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 8510441
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
2
8
2019
pubmed:
2
8
2019
medline:
2
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In renal transplant, surgeons use a myriad of ureteral anastomotic techniques. Although ureteroneocystostomy (UNC) using Lich-Gregoir extravesical anastomosis is used most commonly, ureteroureterostomy with native ureter has its own importance in certain situations. We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent renal transplantation at our center from March 2011 to February 2016. Records of patients who underwent ureteroureterostomy with the native ureter were reviewed for the indications and complications of the procedure. Of 1050 renal transplants during the study period, 32 patients underwent native ureteroureterostomy. Among these 32 patients, 20 patients were planned preoperatively for native ureteroureterostomy (elective), and intraoperative decision was made in 12 patients (emergency). On follow-up, only one patient had ureteral obstruction due to kink just distal to ureteroureterostomy and was managed by double-J stenting. Other patients had an expected postoperative course. In our experience, ureteroureterostomy with native ureter is technically and functionally good option for ureteric reimplantation in kidney transplant patients. It can be used selectively for elective and emergency situations where UNC is not possible. Hence, the kidney transplant surgeon should be well versed with both techniques.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31367074
doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_20_18
pii: IJU-35-218
pmc: PMC6639987
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
218-221Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of interest: There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Urology. 1999 May;53(5):908-12
pubmed: 10223482
J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Jun;188(6):707-9
pubmed: 10359367
J Urol. 2001 Sep;166(3):1046-8
pubmed: 11490295
Transplant Proc. 2005 Jul-Aug;37(6):2518-20
pubmed: 16182730
Urologe A. 2006 Jan;45(1):25-31
pubmed: 16292481
Transpl Int. 2006 Oct;19(10):802-6
pubmed: 16961771
Clin Transplant. 2010 Sep-Oct;24(5):615-9
pubmed: 19925475
Br J Urol. 1991 Apr;67(4):349-51
pubmed: 2032072
Transplant Proc. 2010 Jun;42(5):1413-20
pubmed: 20620446
Urology. 1990 Aug;36(2):183-5
pubmed: 2385890
Transpl Int. 2014 Jun;27(6):593-605
pubmed: 24606191
Exp Clin Transplant. 2016 Jun;14(3):276-81
pubmed: 26925612
J Urol. 1977 Jul;118(1 Pt 1):17-9
pubmed: 327095
Br J Urol. 1986 Feb;58(1):6-11
pubmed: 3512020
Ann Surg. 1987 Apr;205(4):428-31
pubmed: 3551859
J Urol (Paris). 1985;91(1):27-32
pubmed: 3900225
J Urol. 1972 Sep;108(3):380-1
pubmed: 4559504
Ann Surg. 1982 Nov;196(5):588-93
pubmed: 6751247
Clin Transplant. 1994 Dec;8(6):504-7
pubmed: 7865911
Transplant Proc. 1995 Feb;27(1):1091-2
pubmed: 7878817
J Urol. 1994 Mar;151(3):578-81
pubmed: 8308961
J Urol. 1993 Feb;149(2):366-8
pubmed: 8426422
Br J Urol. 1997 Apr;79(4):499-502
pubmed: 9126075
Transplant Proc. 1998 Nov;30(7):3010-2
pubmed: 9838326