Design, delivery and evaluation of a simulation-based workshop for health professional students on falls prevention in acute care settings.

education design falls prevention falls prevention education health professional education research simulated patients simulation

Journal

Nursing open
ISSN: 2054-1058
Titre abrégé: Nurs Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101675107

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Historique:
received: 22 03 2018
revised: 11 04 2019
accepted: 29 04 2019
entrez: 2 8 2019
pubmed: 2 8 2019
medline: 2 8 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To describe the design, delivery and evaluation outcomes of a simulation-based educational workshop to teach a patient-centred falls prevention strategy to health professional students tasked with implementing the strategy during clinical placement. Falls are among the most common and costly threat to patient safety. The Safe Recovery Programme (SRP) is an evidence-based, one-to-one communication approach with demonstrated efficacy at preventing falls in the postgraduate context. Simulation-based education (SBE) is commonly used to address issues of patient safety but has not been widely incorporated into falls prevention. This study was a Pre-Post-test intervention design. Health professional students were taught how to deliver the SRP in an SBE workshop. The workshop incorporated content delivery, role-play simulations and interactions with a simulated patient. Students completed surveys immediately before and after the workshop and after clinical placement. Linear and logistic regression analysis was undertaken to identify differences within each pairwise comparison at the three time points. Qualitative free text responses underwent content analysis. There were 178 students trained. The educational design of the programme described in this paper was highly valued by students. Following the workshop, students' falls knowledge increased and they correctly identified evidence-based strategies except bedrail use and patient sitters. Following clinical placement, fewer SBE students correctly identified evidence surrounding bed alarm use. Students became more confident about falls communication post-SBE; however, this confidence decreased postclinical placement. Motivation to implement the SRP decreased between postworkshop and postclinical placement time points. Falls research often includes educational components but previous studies have failed to adequately describe educational methods. Students learnt about best evidence falls prevention strategies using interactive educational methodologies with a workshop viewed by students as being well-designed and assisting their learning from theory to practice.While students valued the delivery of the SRP using SBE, confidence and motivation to implement falls strategies were not sustained following clinical placement. A programme of education including SBE can be used to support the delivery of falls-based education, but further research is needed to identify what factors may influence student's motivation and confidence to implement falls prevention strategies during clinical placement.

Sections du résumé

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To describe the design, delivery and evaluation outcomes of a simulation-based educational workshop to teach a patient-centred falls prevention strategy to health professional students tasked with implementing the strategy during clinical placement.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Falls are among the most common and costly threat to patient safety. The Safe Recovery Programme (SRP) is an evidence-based, one-to-one communication approach with demonstrated efficacy at preventing falls in the postgraduate context. Simulation-based education (SBE) is commonly used to address issues of patient safety but has not been widely incorporated into falls prevention.
METHODS METHODS
This study was a Pre-Post-test intervention design. Health professional students were taught how to deliver the SRP in an SBE workshop. The workshop incorporated content delivery, role-play simulations and interactions with a simulated patient. Students completed surveys immediately before and after the workshop and after clinical placement. Linear and logistic regression analysis was undertaken to identify differences within each pairwise comparison at the three time points. Qualitative free text responses underwent content analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
There were 178 students trained. The educational design of the programme described in this paper was highly valued by students. Following the workshop, students' falls knowledge increased and they correctly identified evidence-based strategies except bedrail use and patient sitters. Following clinical placement, fewer SBE students correctly identified evidence surrounding bed alarm use. Students became more confident about falls communication post-SBE; however, this confidence decreased postclinical placement. Motivation to implement the SRP decreased between postworkshop and postclinical placement time points.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Falls research often includes educational components but previous studies have failed to adequately describe educational methods. Students learnt about best evidence falls prevention strategies using interactive educational methodologies with a workshop viewed by students as being well-designed and assisting their learning from theory to practice.While students valued the delivery of the SRP using SBE, confidence and motivation to implement falls strategies were not sustained following clinical placement. A programme of education including SBE can be used to support the delivery of falls-based education, but further research is needed to identify what factors may influence student's motivation and confidence to implement falls prevention strategies during clinical placement.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31367441
doi: 10.1002/nop2.318
pii: NOP2318
pmc: PMC6650696
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1150-1162

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None.

Références

Arch Intern Med. 2011 Mar 28;171(6):516-24
pubmed: 21098343
Contemp Nurse. 2006 Oct;23(1):58-71
pubmed: 17083320
J Nurs Educ. 2013 Jan;52(1):39-45
pubmed: 23181458
BMJ. 2004 Mar 20;328(7441):676
pubmed: 15031238
Nursing. 2013 Jun;43(6):68-9
pubmed: 23685698
Acad Med. 2011 Jun;86(6):706-11
pubmed: 21512370
Age Ageing. 2004 Jul;33(4):390-5
pubmed: 15151914
Med Educ. 2017 Dec;51(12):1209-1219
pubmed: 28833360
J Adv Nurs. 2011 Sep;67(9):1984-92
pubmed: 21507049
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Feb;18(2):167-75
pubmed: 17061151
Acad Med. 2010 Sep;85(9):1425-39
pubmed: 20543652
Simul Healthc. 2016 Aug;11(4):249
pubmed: 27490085
Stroke. 1996 Oct;27(10):1821-4
pubmed: 8841338
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 02;6(6):e010192
pubmed: 27256087
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jul 28;18(1):172
pubmed: 30055612
Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):398-405
pubmed: 23480423
J Surg Educ. 2010 Nov-Dec;67(6):439-43
pubmed: 21156305
Nurs Open. 2019 Jul 23;6(3):1150-1162
pubmed: 31367441
Lancet. 2015 Jun 27;385(9987):2592-9
pubmed: 25865864

Auteurs

Debra Kiegaldie (D)

Faculty of Health Science, Youth & Community Studies Holmesglen Institute Holmesglen Victoria Australia.
Healthscope Hospitals Australia Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia.

Debra Nestel (D)

Monash Institute for Health and Clinical Education, Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia.

Elizabeth Pryor (E)

Faculty of Health Science, Youth & Community Studies Holmesglen Institute Holmesglen Victoria Australia.

Cylie Williams (C)

Department of Allied Health Peninsula Health Frankston Victoria Australia.

Kelly-Ann Bowles (KA)

School of Primary and Allied Health Care Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia.

Stephen Maloney (S)

School of Primary and Allied Health Care Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia.

Terry Haines (T)

School of Primary and Allied Health Care Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia.

Classifications MeSH