Denominators Matter: Understanding Medical Encounter Frequency and Its Impact on Surveillance Estimates Using EHR Data.

chronic disease electronic health records epidemiologic monitoring prevalence public health surveillance

Journal

EGEMS (Washington, DC)
ISSN: 2327-9214
Titre abrégé: EGEMS (Wash DC)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101629606

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Jul 2019
Historique:
entrez: 2 8 2019
pubmed: 2 8 2019
medline: 2 8 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There is scant guidance for defining what denominator to use when estimating disease prevalence via electronic health record (EHR) data. Describe the intervals between medical encounters to inform the selection of denominators for population-level disease rates, and evaluate the impact of different denominators on the prevalence of chronic conditions. We analyzed the EHRs of three practices in Massachusetts using the Electronic medical record Support for Public Health (ESP) system. We identified adult patients' first medical encounter per year (2011-2016) and counted days to next encounter. We estimated the prevalence of asthma, hypertension, obesity, and smoking using different denominators in 2016: ≥1 encounter in the past one year or two years and ≥2 encounters in the past one year or two years. In 2011-2016, 1,824,011 patients had 28,181,334 medical encounters. The median interval between encounters was 46, 56, and 66 days, depending on practice. Among patients with one visit in 2014, 82-84 percent had their next encounter within 1 year; 87-91 percent had their next encounter within two years. Increasing the encounter interval from one to two years increased the denominator by 23 percent. The prevalence of asthma, hypertension, and obesity increased with successively stricter denominators - e.g., the prevalence of obesity was 24.1 percent among those with ≥1 encounter in the past two years, 26.3 percent among those with ≥1 encounter in the last one year, and 28.5 percent among those with ≥2 encounters in the past one year. Prevalence estimates for chronic conditions can vary by >20 percent depending upon denominator. Understanding such differences will inform which denominator definition is best to be used for the need at hand.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
There is scant guidance for defining what denominator to use when estimating disease prevalence via electronic health record (EHR) data.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
Describe the intervals between medical encounters to inform the selection of denominators for population-level disease rates, and evaluate the impact of different denominators on the prevalence of chronic conditions.
METHODS METHODS
We analyzed the EHRs of three practices in Massachusetts using the Electronic medical record Support for Public Health (ESP) system. We identified adult patients' first medical encounter per year (2011-2016) and counted days to next encounter. We estimated the prevalence of asthma, hypertension, obesity, and smoking using different denominators in 2016: ≥1 encounter in the past one year or two years and ≥2 encounters in the past one year or two years.
RESULTS RESULTS
In 2011-2016, 1,824,011 patients had 28,181,334 medical encounters. The median interval between encounters was 46, 56, and 66 days, depending on practice. Among patients with one visit in 2014, 82-84 percent had their next encounter within 1 year; 87-91 percent had their next encounter within two years. Increasing the encounter interval from one to two years increased the denominator by 23 percent. The prevalence of asthma, hypertension, and obesity increased with successively stricter denominators - e.g., the prevalence of obesity was 24.1 percent among those with ≥1 encounter in the past two years, 26.3 percent among those with ≥1 encounter in the last one year, and 28.5 percent among those with ≥2 encounters in the past one year.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Prevalence estimates for chronic conditions can vary by >20 percent depending upon denominator. Understanding such differences will inform which denominator definition is best to be used for the need at hand.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31367648
doi: 10.5334/egems.292
pmc: PMC6659575
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

31

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Références

Can J Diabetes. 2014 Jun;38(3):179-85
pubmed: 24835515
Am J Public Health. 2014 Dec;104(12):2265-70
pubmed: 25322301
CMAJ. 2015 Mar 3;187(4):239-240
pubmed: 25421989
Popul Health Manag. 2015 Jun;18(3):209-16
pubmed: 25608033
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2016 Sep;30(9):409-15
pubmed: 27610462
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Dec 15;4(1):1266
pubmed: 28154836
Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 23;6(1):38
pubmed: 28231810
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(9):1406-1412
pubmed: 28727539

Auteurs

Noelle M Cocoros (NM)

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, US.

Aileen Ochoa (A)

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, US.

Karen Eberhardt (K)

Commonwealth Informatics, US.

Bob Zambarano (B)

Commonwealth Informatics, US.

Michael Klompas (M)

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, US.
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, US.

Classifications MeSH