Client experiences with antenatal care waiting times in southern Mozambique.
Antenatal care
Health services
Maternal and child health
Quality of care
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2019
01 Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
18
02
2019
accepted:
24
07
2019
entrez:
3
8
2019
pubmed:
3
8
2019
medline:
23
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Antenatal care (ANC) provides a range of critical health services during pregnancy that can improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes. In Mozambique, only half of women receive four or more ANC visits, which are provided for free at public health centers by maternal and child health (MCH) nurses. Waiting time has been shown to contribute to negative client experiences, which may be a driver of low maternity care utilization. A recent pilot study of a program to schedule ANC visits demonstrated that scheduling care reduces waiting time and results in higher rates of complete ANC. This study aims to explore client experiences with waiting time for ANC in standard practice and care and after the introduction of appointment scheduling. This study uses a series of qualitative interviews to unpack client experiences with ANC waiting time with and without scheduled care, in order to better understand the impact of waiting time on client experiences. Thirty-eight interviews were collected in May to June 2017 at three pilot study clinics in southern Mozambique, with a focus on two paired intervention and comparison facilities sharing similar facility characteristics. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis methods using NVivo software. Clients described strong motivations to seek ANC, pointing to the need to address convenience of care, and highlighted direct and indirect costs of seeking care that were exacerbated by long waiting times. Direct costs include time and transport costs of going to the clinic, while indirect costs include being unable to fulfill household and work obligations. Other barriers to complete ANC utilization of four or more visits include transport costs, negative provider experiences, and delayed ANC initiation, which limit the potential number of clinic contacts. Findings demonstrate that the scheduling intervention improves the client experience of seeking care by allowing women to both seek ANC and fulfill other productive obligations. Innovation in healthcare delivery should consider adapting models that minimize waiting times.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Antenatal care (ANC) provides a range of critical health services during pregnancy that can improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes. In Mozambique, only half of women receive four or more ANC visits, which are provided for free at public health centers by maternal and child health (MCH) nurses. Waiting time has been shown to contribute to negative client experiences, which may be a driver of low maternity care utilization. A recent pilot study of a program to schedule ANC visits demonstrated that scheduling care reduces waiting time and results in higher rates of complete ANC. This study aims to explore client experiences with waiting time for ANC in standard practice and care and after the introduction of appointment scheduling.
METHODS
METHODS
This study uses a series of qualitative interviews to unpack client experiences with ANC waiting time with and without scheduled care, in order to better understand the impact of waiting time on client experiences. Thirty-eight interviews were collected in May to June 2017 at three pilot study clinics in southern Mozambique, with a focus on two paired intervention and comparison facilities sharing similar facility characteristics. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis methods using NVivo software.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Clients described strong motivations to seek ANC, pointing to the need to address convenience of care, and highlighted direct and indirect costs of seeking care that were exacerbated by long waiting times. Direct costs include time and transport costs of going to the clinic, while indirect costs include being unable to fulfill household and work obligations. Other barriers to complete ANC utilization of four or more visits include transport costs, negative provider experiences, and delayed ANC initiation, which limit the potential number of clinic contacts.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Findings demonstrate that the scheduling intervention improves the client experience of seeking care by allowing women to both seek ANC and fulfill other productive obligations. Innovation in healthcare delivery should consider adapting models that minimize waiting times.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31370854
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4369-6
pii: 10.1186/s12913-019-4369-6
pmc: PMC6670125
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
538Subventions
Organisme : Maternal Health Task Force
ID : N/A
Organisme : Michael Von Clemm Traveling Fellowship
ID : N/A
Organisme : Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health
ID : N/A
Références
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Mar 04;9:10
pubmed: 19261181
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Nov 25;4(6):e001788
pubmed: 31803509
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 May 21;14:228
pubmed: 24886392
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Oct 18;15(1):173
pubmed: 27756374
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Mar 1;32(2):257-266
pubmed: 28207046
Hum Resour Health. 2014 Jan 25;12:5
pubmed: 24460789
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 21;13(12):e0209586
pubmed: 30576388
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 22;12(3):e0173068
pubmed: 28328940
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 11;14(2):e0210622
pubmed: 30742623
Qual Health Res. 2009 Feb;19(2):279-89
pubmed: 19150890
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Aug 1;72 Suppl 2:S181-8
pubmed: 27355507
Glob Health Action. 2015 Oct 22;8:28567
pubmed: 26498576
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;130:42-50
pubmed: 25681713
Lancet. 2015 Sep 19;386(9999):1165-210
pubmed: 26051370
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jan;6(1):e57-e65
pubmed: 29241615
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 17;14:30
pubmed: 24438560
Lancet. 2014 Jul 26;384(9940):347-70
pubmed: 24853604
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Jul;57(2):355-74
pubmed: 12765714
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 May;5(5):e480-e481
pubmed: 28302563
PLoS Med. 2019 Mar 29;16(3):e1002768
pubmed: 30925181
Reprod Health. 2016 Jun 08;13 Suppl 1:31
pubmed: 27356968
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Mar 19;7:164
pubmed: 24646407
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Jun 1;95(6):465-472
pubmed: 28603313
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Sep;42(5):533-44
pubmed: 24193818
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 03;14:1240
pubmed: 25467030
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 02;15:200
pubmed: 26330022